Hope this is allowed! I've browsed on this site for a while, even had another username where I engaged in some fairly civil debates with other users before I was banned due to not being a Q follower.
Interested in having a friendly discussion with anyone who's up for it!
A bit about me:
I'm a mechanical engineer working in product marketing I live in a major city, Chicago, and have pretty much only voted democrat I am a homeowner I have followed conspiracies for a while based solely on my own curiosity, and by and large found that a lot of the major ones (pizzagate, Q) don't make a ton of sense, but I'm not here to argue that. I think we're just gonna have different opinions on it.
All said, happy to have a casual AMA! Not interested in flamebaiting or arguing
Previously in this thread, you mentioned the damning fact about Biden threatening to withhold funds unless the prosecutor who was investigating Burisma was fired, and “son of a bitch,” they fired him
I’m telling you, and waiting for you to acknowledge, the fact that the timeline here is not exactly how you appear to see it. But it appears that you haven’t done your research on this critical fact
Your staunch refusal to actually provide links / data / facts / information while putting the entire onus of discussion on me is, frankly, unfair.
I told you that that was a jumping off point for the rest of my research. I didn't rely on it in any of my arguments. I found the statement out of character for what someone as VP would say. It got my "spidey senses" tingling. And then from there I conducted the rest of my research... The status of the Prosecutor has absolutely nothing to do with my argument. Not a single thing. I mean, my goodness, if I were to give you a list of 4 things and ask you to pick the one that doesn't belong, I'm not so sure you could do it.
You have contributed exactly ZERO to our discussion. You cannot let the Prosecutor go. You are stuck on an element with ZERO relevance to my argument. ZERO. Why is that so hard to understand? Do I need to express that in a different language??
The Prosecutor has NOTHING TO DO WITH MY ARGUMENT OF THE BIDENS BEING DIRTY.
My argument has to do with the corruption of the Bidens. What on earth does the Prosecutor have to do with that? Not a damn thing. I'm talking about the BIDENS.
The way I see it, if you use the situation with the prosecutor as a jumping off point, then it’s open to scrutiny. The early part of our discussion revolves entirely around the fact that he fired this prosecutor who was investigating naughty things. We spoke on that at length. It was only after I brought up the timeline that you suddenly said that these actions are irrelevant
It absolutely is not.
You're hilarious.
I can completely understand why you are a Biden voter. Your capacity for logic and thought is extremely lacking.
If you want to draft up an argument to support your case about why I am so wrong, then please, go right ahead. I have supported my claim. Nothing in my argument has changed.
Luckily for us though, the rules of thought and logic are solid and don't go along with the whims of someone who thinks it's one way when it isn't. Read a book.
Mkay.
So here are the facts. You were very gung-ho about the fact that Biden himself admitted to this blackmailing and that was the jumping off point to your research, as I understand.
So, to me, if I were in your shoes and wanted to do my due diligence on learning what is the meaning behind Biden sharing this, I would first look at the basic facts, to answer the question, “is what Biden just said true?” As a matter of fact, no! According to events that actually happened, including time where Biden was in Ukraine vs the time when the prosecutor was fired (7 months later) vs when the money was paid, the very basis of the argument, Biden’s quote, is already false! Thus, if you had done your research and started at the start, I’d be confused how you got any farther than this point.
So, if you are aware that this quote that Biden stated implying blackmail does not actually reflect the timeline of events, why did you continue to dig?