Check out genetic immunity from most Chinese viruses due to ancestors surviving the Black Plague-Tcell changes occurred with survivors of the Black Plague- immunity carried on X chromosome so females have higher immunity- was easy to research prior to 1/2020
Anyway pushing the racism crap ( worse health careEtc) is bs — Disease immunity comes with genetic hereditary preposition— the Chinese virus was probably geared to a demographic/
Just show her the effectiveness numbers for HCQ and ivermectin. The presence of highly effective and safe solutions with billions of doses taken globally for decades may convince her to not try an unproven vaccine.
It's a CDC site at that. If that's a conspiracy site then isn't that a huge reason not to take the vaccine as well??? There is no reason to take it, at all. None. VAERS is a great starting point. I put in the side effect DEATH(actually 'year died'), and vaccine type COVID-19. Your jaw will hit the floor if you're not ready for that data.
https://www.americasfrontlinedoctors.org/
Tap on Covid 19 and she can get an appt over the phone with a doctor and they will prescribe hcq or ivermectin and send it to her home or local pharmacy.
I just did it today. 90$ consultation fee plus cost of meds.
But it's very important to sort out the "health problems". Read "The Rosedale Diet" eBook. You don't have to follow the strict diet (although it helps if you do) but read the book and especially the section about supplements such as D3, magnesium and zinc.
People with diabetes are at risk but type 2 diabetes can be fixed in most people.
I know another doctor people have been talking about & sharing is Dr. Tenpenny, I’ve only seen one or two videos with her but found some videos on Rumble you can check out to see if there’s something that may help ...
Can anyone provide me any good fact-based resources on this so it can't just be dismissed as "coming from obscure conspiracy sites"?
Well, this is pretty simple. Your father's claim that "You're just getting that from conspiracy websites" is a formal fallacy of reasoning. It is a form of what is called "argumentum ad hominem". That is Latin for something like "arguing to the man", as opposed of arguing to the point. In this case "the man" is web sites which do not meet your father's approval, but the underlying reality holds: he is addressing the source of an argument as a way to avoid the actual argument. Even better, I'll give an example:
This is a relatively "obscure conspiracy site", right? I'm going to make a claim. Here it is: 1 + 1 = 2. Is the veracity of the claim that 1 + 1 = 2 compromised by the fact that I am making the claim here on this "obscure conspiracy site" or does it hold because it is true and represents a fact of reality in and of itself?
It is easy to come up with other examples: "fire is hot", "ice is cold", "the force of gravity generally causes what goes up to come back down", etc. All of these are true independent of what site states them.
So how might you use this? You simply point out the objective fact that your father is not refuting anything. He is just criticizing the source without addressing the arguments at all. Therefore, his tactic changes NOTHING.
More to the root regarding to take the experimental jab or to not take the experimental jab, it is really a rather simple choice that is probably best assessed probabilistically. We now have over a year's worth of data as to the risk of dying from the China Virus. The long-term outcome of the experimental injections is essentially unknown. Plus, we have many effective therapeutics with established safety. Beyond that, it is up to the individual: very low, known risk with WuFlu (and therapeutics) or unknown risk with an experimental drug undergoing an unprecedented clinical trial? Seems I've heard of people catching the virus after the injection. Seems I've also heard that there will need to be endless boosters. My faith is in God, my immune system, and well-established prophylactics and therapeutics. Many years from now, if legit data is available, and if my risk profile changes, I might reconsider the injections. For now, the injections just don't seem to make any sense for anyone at all other than those who wish to volunteer for a dangerous clinical trial for whatever reason.
For anyone aware of the election fraud and surrounding reality, there may be further concerns worth considering given that it is mostly the same people we've already caught lying and being generally evil that are now pushing this clinical trial aggressively and trying to bully and frighten people into taking it.
One other fact that comes to mind is that the lobotomy procedure won a Nobel Prize and was highly regarded for many years. As I recall, the first procedures were conducted with the founding doctor's wife's icepick from the kitchen drawer. Point being, we know the so-called scientific establishment can make huge, life-ruining and life-ending mistakes. They have made many and will likely make many more. It is important that people take responsibility for themselves and remember that we are all human and we are all fallible. Choose whom you trust with the utmost care: especially now!
Another notable point is that, even under the exaggerated numbers for the China Virus, it seems to be competing with medical malpractice for a top five position for causing deaths in America. That could theoretically inform an assessment of the clinical trial's risk. I mean a clinical trial has to be more likely to result in your death than standard, well-established medical practice, right? (https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/news/media/releases/study_suggests_medical_errors_now_third_leading_cause_of_death_in_the_us)
Been following interviews about this. Some common sense....
1- If you or someone you know had bad side effects, why would you want to take the risk of same or similar?
2-If you or someone you know has pre-existing health issues, why take chances even worse than the virus itself?
3-If you or someone you know had a bad reaction to the 1st shot, why would you go back for more from the 2nd shot?
I would have a nice long talk with your grandmother again and first ask her how she's doing? And then explain to her on what's happening with your Mom and that Father is trying to talk everyone into getting the shot!
Your father sounds like he is trying to prove something based on what the Media is saying. And I have a conspiracy for you. Why is Bill Gate's taking up farming when he could spend his time coming up with a better OS?
Terrible, sorry, wash my brain out with soap, but my first thought was, does his dad want to do away with his mom? I am a suspicious creature now in view of all the evidence and how astounding it is that anyone is still pro "vacc" for anyone they love.
I am very surprised that people believe reactions like that are normal. In the end you can show your mom the door, but she has to choose to open it. I feel your pain most of my loved ones got the shots. It is heartbreaking but they have to make the choice for themselves. Perhaps ask her to hold off on getting it until it gets official approval since these are all allowed under emergency use and you should be able to find that proof easily.
Check out genetic immunity from most Chinese viruses due to ancestors surviving the Black Plague-Tcell changes occurred with survivors of the Black Plague- immunity carried on X chromosome so females have higher immunity- was easy to research prior to 1/2020 Anyway pushing the racism crap ( worse health careEtc) is bs — Disease immunity comes with genetic hereditary preposition— the Chinese virus was probably geared to a demographic/
Just show her the effectiveness numbers for HCQ and ivermectin. The presence of highly effective and safe solutions with billions of doses taken globally for decades may convince her to not try an unproven vaccine.
Check this someone just posted. Download the 2021 CSV File (VAERS Vaccine) 13.15 mb file 186000 injuries already this year. https://vaers.hhs.gov/data/datasets.html
It's a CDC site at that. If that's a conspiracy site then isn't that a huge reason not to take the vaccine as well??? There is no reason to take it, at all. None. VAERS is a great starting point. I put in the side effect DEATH(actually 'year died'), and vaccine type COVID-19. Your jaw will hit the floor if you're not ready for that data.
https://www.americasfrontlinedoctors.org/ Tap on Covid 19 and she can get an appt over the phone with a doctor and they will prescribe hcq or ivermectin and send it to her home or local pharmacy. I just did it today. 90$ consultation fee plus cost of meds.
^^^ THIS ^^^
But it's very important to sort out the "health problems". Read "The Rosedale Diet" eBook. You don't have to follow the strict diet (although it helps if you do) but read the book and especially the section about supplements such as D3, magnesium and zinc.
People with diabetes are at risk but type 2 diabetes can be fixed in most people.
Here is Dr. Simone Gold talking about the virus & “vaccine” she calls it a bio weapon...
https://rumble.com/vd3aur-dr-simone-gold-the-truth-about-the-covid-19-vaccine.html
American Frontline Doctors news page ...
https://www.americasfrontlinedoctors.org/frontline-news
American Frontline Doctors videos page ...
https://www.americasfrontlinedoctors.org/media/videos
American Frontline Doctors vaccine page ...
https://www.americasfrontlinedoctors.org/covid-19/vaccine-information
American Frontline Doctors covid treatments ...
https://www.americasfrontlinedoctors.org/covid-19/treatments
Really just click around on America’s Frontline Doctors page and you will find a ton of information.
Dr. Ryan Cole ... TALK ABOUT COVID-19, MRNA BIOWEAPON, IVERMECTIN, & THE IMPORTANCE OF VITAMIN D
https://www.bitchute.com/video/InH89amCpy7S/
I know another doctor people have been talking about & sharing is Dr. Tenpenny, I’ve only seen one or two videos with her but found some videos on Rumble you can check out to see if there’s something that may help ...
https://rumble.com/c/c-593647
Hope this helps!
Well, this is pretty simple. Your father's claim that "You're just getting that from conspiracy websites" is a formal fallacy of reasoning. It is a form of what is called "argumentum ad hominem". That is Latin for something like "arguing to the man", as opposed of arguing to the point. In this case "the man" is web sites which do not meet your father's approval, but the underlying reality holds: he is addressing the source of an argument as a way to avoid the actual argument. Even better, I'll give an example:
This is a relatively "obscure conspiracy site", right? I'm going to make a claim. Here it is: 1 + 1 = 2. Is the veracity of the claim that 1 + 1 = 2 compromised by the fact that I am making the claim here on this "obscure conspiracy site" or does it hold because it is true and represents a fact of reality in and of itself?
It is easy to come up with other examples: "fire is hot", "ice is cold", "the force of gravity generally causes what goes up to come back down", etc. All of these are true independent of what site states them.
So how might you use this? You simply point out the objective fact that your father is not refuting anything. He is just criticizing the source without addressing the arguments at all. Therefore, his tactic changes NOTHING.
More to the root regarding to take the experimental jab or to not take the experimental jab, it is really a rather simple choice that is probably best assessed probabilistically. We now have over a year's worth of data as to the risk of dying from the China Virus. The long-term outcome of the experimental injections is essentially unknown. Plus, we have many effective therapeutics with established safety. Beyond that, it is up to the individual: very low, known risk with WuFlu (and therapeutics) or unknown risk with an experimental drug undergoing an unprecedented clinical trial? Seems I've heard of people catching the virus after the injection. Seems I've also heard that there will need to be endless boosters. My faith is in God, my immune system, and well-established prophylactics and therapeutics. Many years from now, if legit data is available, and if my risk profile changes, I might reconsider the injections. For now, the injections just don't seem to make any sense for anyone at all other than those who wish to volunteer for a dangerous clinical trial for whatever reason.
For anyone aware of the election fraud and surrounding reality, there may be further concerns worth considering given that it is mostly the same people we've already caught lying and being generally evil that are now pushing this clinical trial aggressively and trying to bully and frighten people into taking it.
One other fact that comes to mind is that the lobotomy procedure won a Nobel Prize and was highly regarded for many years. As I recall, the first procedures were conducted with the founding doctor's wife's icepick from the kitchen drawer. Point being, we know the so-called scientific establishment can make huge, life-ruining and life-ending mistakes. They have made many and will likely make many more. It is important that people take responsibility for themselves and remember that we are all human and we are all fallible. Choose whom you trust with the utmost care: especially now!
Another notable point is that, even under the exaggerated numbers for the China Virus, it seems to be competing with medical malpractice for a top five position for causing deaths in America. That could theoretically inform an assessment of the clinical trial's risk. I mean a clinical trial has to be more likely to result in your death than standard, well-established medical practice, right? (https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/news/media/releases/study_suggests_medical_errors_now_third_leading_cause_of_death_in_the_us)
Good luck!
Hcq is a good prophylactic. I will be taking 2 tablets each week to prevent the coof.
Tell him there's shrinkage involved..he'll back out. ?
Been following interviews about this. Some common sense.... 1- If you or someone you know had bad side effects, why would you want to take the risk of same or similar? 2-If you or someone you know has pre-existing health issues, why take chances even worse than the virus itself? 3-If you or someone you know had a bad reaction to the 1st shot, why would you go back for more from the 2nd shot?
I would have a nice long talk with your grandmother again and first ask her how she's doing? And then explain to her on what's happening with your Mom and that Father is trying to talk everyone into getting the shot!
Your father sounds like he is trying to prove something based on what the Media is saying. And I have a conspiracy for you. Why is Bill Gate's taking up farming when he could spend his time coming up with a better OS?
Terrible, sorry, wash my brain out with soap, but my first thought was, does his dad want to do away with his mom? I am a suspicious creature now in view of all the evidence and how astounding it is that anyone is still pro "vacc" for anyone they love.
I am very surprised that people believe reactions like that are normal. In the end you can show your mom the door, but she has to choose to open it. I feel your pain most of my loved ones got the shots. It is heartbreaking but they have to make the choice for themselves. Perhaps ask her to hold off on getting it until it gets official approval since these are all allowed under emergency use and you should be able to find that proof easily.