First, I will never get the vax, dangerous or not, it is experimental and the 99.8% survival rate of covid does not require a vax.
My point is, how can it be dangerous and allowef to roll out by the Q team?
And if it is not dangerous does it hurt our cause for us to try and convince others that it is dangerous? Should we simply quietly not get it and if asked explain low mortality rate of covid and experimental status of vax, but avoid alarmist comments about the vax being a depopulation tool.
Lastly, if the vax is indeed dangerous, did Q lose? And if that is the case what is plan B.
Well VAERS does say as of this morning 4,300 people have died directly as a result of the vaccine in 2021 alone.
That’s more than the past 20 years combined for all vaccines.
Not saying it’s worse or better than covid, but this vaccine is bad juju
No, VAERS does not report that way. That's all deaths, even unrelated to the vaccine, unless you are looking at something new. Care to link this data? Or were you wrong?
Search on VAERS for covid 19 vaccine ONLY and 2021 ONLY and search for deaths ONLY and you will see the numbers for yourself. I tried linking but it makes you search for yourself.
Try giving it a search. I gave you the link
It's like I'm dealing with children. Why do I have to explain these things to you?
All deaths after taking the vaccines are reported to VAERS. All deaths. Not ones linked to the vaccine, but all of them. So when millions and millions of people take a vaccine of course there are going to be people that die afterwards, because people fucking die all the time. There would be VAERS deaths reports if it was tracking a placebo, understand?
Even if you assume all VAERS deaths are caused by the vaccine, which is an absurd premise, but even if I give you that; it's statistically STILL less dangerous than covid, which is not what was claimed above. Also, the claimant above never showed up to back up his claim, because he was fucking lying.
Did you read this paragraph too? Keep cursing, you’re losing credibility tough guy. How about you talk to me like a grown man/woman.
“The strengths of VAERS are that it is national in scope and can quickly provide an early warning of a safety problem with a vaccine. As part of CDC and FDA's multi-system approach to post-licensure vaccine safety monitoring, VAERS is designed to rapidly detect unusual or unexpected patterns of adverse events, also known as "safety signals." If a safety signal is found in VAERS, further studies can be done in safety systems such as the CDC's Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD) or the Clinical Immunization Safety Assessment (CISA) project. These systems do not have the same limitations as VAERS, and can better assess health risks and possible connections between adverse events and a vaccine.”
You do know VAERS says In the same statement that although you can’t attribute every event as correct, it is valuable information to understanding a vaccine in its early stages? Did you keep reading?
Also go ahead and read Nuremberg code. Even ONE death and keeping this trial going is a violation of Nuremberg code
So just downvote me instead of backing of your claim which is an obvious lie. You idiots need to assess how you intake information.
https://wonder.cdc.gov/controller/datarequest/D8;jsessionid=356189845E28C08A6BFBEE436301
Here you go buddy. Yes VAERS does report it
So are you lying to everyone here? Or just misinformed? Like I said, you need to reassess how you intake information, you're too easy to fool with propaganda.
So you don’t have a response to your claims of this being false info when I have given you the tools to see for yourself?