I am looking for a quick ELI5 explanation to tell my friends and family why the AZ forensic audit is needed if “all these previous judges said there was no basis for a hearing on election fraud” (Their words, not mine)
I don’t have a quick explanation for them and they throw this in my face constantly.
Thank you kindly.
Easy - they were either scared of what would happen to them so they passed the buck or they were compromised or a corrupt political hack, They never actually saw evidence, they mostly just rejected to hear the case claiming "no standing". Of the 23 cases that DID get heard, Trump won I believe it was 17 of them - including the one in Wisconsin that should have invalidated over 230,000 votes.