Yeah, I think you'll find that you're the one who is "partially right" and "partially wrong" here.
Jerome Horwitz didn't think that AZT was useful... for Cancer. Not that it was "cruel". I'd love to see who actually said that comment, as it's an oft-quoted, but never directly sourced statement I see.
Have you ever seen, in person, any animal or human subjects die of uncontrolled Lentivirus? What would you propose we use? Biologics? Steroids? Steroids have measurably negative effects and they can only control minor issues, but they're overall useful.
As I said, I don't think the layman understands the biological dynamics of infection with a Retrovirus. It's not a hoax, it's not imagination. It has real, measurable effects on the body. As I also said, please, infect yourself with it. I'd love to see someone "beat" it with nothing at all.
Yeah, I think you'll find that you're the one who is "partially right" and "partially wrong" here.
Jerome Horwitz didn't think that AZT was useful... for Cancer. Not that it was "cruel". I'd love to see who actually said that comment, as it's an oft-quoted, but never directly sourced statement I see.
Have you ever seen, in person, any animal or human subjects die of uncontrolled Lentivirus? What would you propose we use? Biologics? Steroids? Steroids have measurably negative effects and they can only control minor issues, but they're overall useful.
As I said, I don't think the layman understands the biological dynamics of infection with a Retrovirus. It's not a hoax, it's not imagination. It has real, measurable effects on the body. As I also said, please, infect yourself with it. I'd love to see someone "beat" it with nothing at all.