Before the Operation Warp Speed briefings, the majority of us didn't know who Fauci was. Now he's renown as one of the most crooked people who ever lived.
What was his angle back then, was AIDS their accidental first foray into "population control"? Or was it all about getting the most money for pharma companies at the time?
Here's an interesting tidbit from the AZT article someone else posted. AZT was originally a failed chemotherapy drug (too toxic) that they rebranded as "Retrovir" for AIDS patients, hmmm that sounds like another failed drug Fauci was touting last year. Also this line at the end:
GMHC now urged “everybody to get tested,” and of course those who test positive to go on to AZT. “These people are running into the gas chambers,” says Duesberg. “Himmler would have been so happy if only the Jews were this cooperative.”
It wasn't a failed "chemotherapy" drug that was deemed "too toxic".
Its targeted mechanism was supposed upon the research of Temin and Baltimore et al's al environmental retrovirus-to-cancer theory.
It turned out that cancers aren't based on human retroviruses, (aside from HTLV), ergo, it wasn't a useful treatment in its current form (it was however broken down and used in other anti-tumor based treatments).
AZT has side effects, but it has saved a lot of lives.
I don't think every day people understand just how hard, how many mechanisms and biological processes are involved when you have retroviruses, more specifically Lentiviruses. It's not at all an easy thing to treat and the fact that we have something that does work, even if it does have some side effects in some people is astounding.
OP's meme claim that people died from AZT more than AIDS is so outstandingly ignorant, factually incorrect and just patently stupid. I could go on, but I know people will probably dislike this comment because it flies in the face of their confirmation bias, but oh well.
It was never approved by the FDA in its current form prior to becoming an AIDS treatment, if you don't want to call it failed then you can use the more delicate term "unsuccessful" due to "lack of efficacy and an unacceptably high side effect profile", but it didn't work. The drug wasn't completely useless for AIDS, but it needed tweaking as the doses they were giving long term resulted in the side effects and didn't prevent death. Sure it was better than nothing short term, but to claim everyone who tested positive should get on this drug was terrible advice and, given its incredibly high cost, looked more like an opportunistic cash grab than a measure for public health. That's why Fauci gets shit for his recommendations back then, and his current behavior promoting high cost treatments and vaccines over inexpensive, widely available, safer alternatives is even worse. There are much better treatment options or drug combinations for HIV/AIDS now, and the worry with the covid vaccine is that it will be ineffective and will be looked back on as a similar mistake where we "didn't know any better yet" while a few pharma companies raked in billions with legal immunity. The difference is the vaccine isn't being given to a few thousand terminally ill patients, they're trying to push it to the entire US (and eventually world) population. I don't disagree with you and you obviously know what you're talking about, but regardless of how you think Fauci and his contemporaries handled AIDS, what they've been doing the past year is criminal.
I was watching this earlier and I noticed how their main concern was getting funding for AIDS it was always about the money and to keep people sick, look at the protesters placards in some scenes very interesting
HIV has never been isolated its all a big fraud there was a theory that the AIDS started when they gave homosexuals a hepatitis vaccine in the late 70s also the gay lifestyle in the 80s was lots of drugs, partying ,promiscuity that led to weakened immune systems
I will state this again, because it bears repeating :
OP's meme claim that people died from AZT more than AIDS is so outstandingly ignorant, factually incorrect and just patently stupid.
Lentivirus/Retroviruses are extremely hard to treat and the fact we have something that does work is amazing.
You're free to see how far you get with uncontrolled HIV if you please. I'd love to see someone try and beat a Lentivirus with nothing at all.
Yeah, I think you'll find that you're the one who is "partially right" and "partially wrong" here.
Jerome Horwitz didn't think that AZT was useful... for Cancer. Not that it was "cruel". I'd love to see who actually said that comment, as it's an oft-quoted, but never directly sourced statement I see.
Have you ever seen, in person, any animal or human subjects die of uncontrolled Lentivirus? What would you propose we use? Biologics? Steroids? Steroids have measurably negative effects and they can only control minor issues, but they're overall useful.
As I said, I don't think the layman understands the biological dynamics of infection with a Retrovirus. It's not a hoax, it's not imagination. It has real, measurable effects on the body. As I also said, please, infect yourself with it. I'd love to see someone "beat" it with nothing at all.
It's no wonder he thinks he can say anything he wants, any time, any where, and never has to face any consequences.
Barney Fife was SO right. "nip it in the bud" is wisdom, not a laughable joke.
Before the Operation Warp Speed briefings, the majority of us didn't know who Fauci was. Now he's renown as one of the most crooked people who ever lived.
He should be flayed alive by a mob of angry gays, school children and seniors for what he's done.
I wonder if his neck will snap like a toothpick or pop like a Budweiser zip top when he's hung?
What was his angle back then, was AIDS their accidental first foray into "population control"? Or was it all about getting the most money for pharma companies at the time?
Here's an interesting tidbit from the AZT article someone else posted. AZT was originally a failed chemotherapy drug (too toxic) that they rebranded as "Retrovir" for AIDS patients, hmmm that sounds like another failed drug Fauci was touting last year. Also this line at the end:
Just like the vaccines today...
That isn't exactly true.
It wasn't a failed "chemotherapy" drug that was deemed "too toxic". Its targeted mechanism was supposed upon the research of Temin and Baltimore et al's al environmental retrovirus-to-cancer theory.
It turned out that cancers aren't based on human retroviruses, (aside from HTLV), ergo, it wasn't a useful treatment in its current form (it was however broken down and used in other anti-tumor based treatments).
AZT has side effects, but it has saved a lot of lives.
I don't think every day people understand just how hard, how many mechanisms and biological processes are involved when you have retroviruses, more specifically Lentiviruses. It's not at all an easy thing to treat and the fact that we have something that does work, even if it does have some side effects in some people is astounding.
OP's meme claim that people died from AZT more than AIDS is so outstandingly ignorant, factually incorrect and just patently stupid. I could go on, but I know people will probably dislike this comment because it flies in the face of their confirmation bias, but oh well.
It was never approved by the FDA in its current form prior to becoming an AIDS treatment, if you don't want to call it failed then you can use the more delicate term "unsuccessful" due to "lack of efficacy and an unacceptably high side effect profile", but it didn't work. The drug wasn't completely useless for AIDS, but it needed tweaking as the doses they were giving long term resulted in the side effects and didn't prevent death. Sure it was better than nothing short term, but to claim everyone who tested positive should get on this drug was terrible advice and, given its incredibly high cost, looked more like an opportunistic cash grab than a measure for public health. That's why Fauci gets shit for his recommendations back then, and his current behavior promoting high cost treatments and vaccines over inexpensive, widely available, safer alternatives is even worse. There are much better treatment options or drug combinations for HIV/AIDS now, and the worry with the covid vaccine is that it will be ineffective and will be looked back on as a similar mistake where we "didn't know any better yet" while a few pharma companies raked in billions with legal immunity. The difference is the vaccine isn't being given to a few thousand terminally ill patients, they're trying to push it to the entire US (and eventually world) population. I don't disagree with you and you obviously know what you're talking about, but regardless of how you think Fauci and his contemporaries handled AIDS, what they've been doing the past year is criminal.
He also thought children could spread it. Only in the government could such an ignoramus get to the top.
https://youtu.be/Qxx14RCxblg?t=1575
I was watching this earlier and I noticed how their main concern was getting funding for AIDS it was always about the money and to keep people sick, look at the protesters placards in some scenes very interesting
HIV has never been isolated its all a big fraud there was a theory that the AIDS started when they gave homosexuals a hepatitis vaccine in the late 70s also the gay lifestyle in the 80s was lots of drugs, partying ,promiscuity that led to weakened immune systems
I will state this again, because it bears repeating : OP's meme claim that people died from AZT more than AIDS is so outstandingly ignorant, factually incorrect and just patently stupid.
Lentivirus/Retroviruses are extremely hard to treat and the fact we have something that does work is amazing.
You're free to see how far you get with uncontrolled HIV if you please. I'd love to see someone try and beat a Lentivirus with nothing at all.
Yeah, I think you'll find that you're the one who is "partially right" and "partially wrong" here.
Jerome Horwitz didn't think that AZT was useful... for Cancer. Not that it was "cruel". I'd love to see who actually said that comment, as it's an oft-quoted, but never directly sourced statement I see.
Have you ever seen, in person, any animal or human subjects die of uncontrolled Lentivirus? What would you propose we use? Biologics? Steroids? Steroids have measurably negative effects and they can only control minor issues, but they're overall useful.
As I said, I don't think the layman understands the biological dynamics of infection with a Retrovirus. It's not a hoax, it's not imagination. It has real, measurable effects on the body. As I also said, please, infect yourself with it. I'd love to see someone "beat" it with nothing at all.
Watch it:
HIV=AIDS - Fauci's First Fraud