I have seen many contradictory posting on this topic so I thought I would summarize my thoughts and would like feedback on others opinions.
Shouldn't it be pretty straight forward if fraud is found in Arizona to compare the major discovery to the other states and determine if those states are legitimate or not? I would think this would be a pretty straight forward to overturn the other elections once the full audit is complete and it the evidence is conclusive of the ways and outlets they cheated and by how much.
An analogy of this for example is if a thief is caught in the act robbing a bank and the way in which that thief robbed the bank is in line with a dozen other banks that were robbed. That is usually enough probable cause to charge the thief with those crimes as well, even though he wasn't caught in the act of those robberies.
So when the evidence is conclusive in Arizona that says overwhelming fraud was discovered and this is the way in which they cheated and by how much. The election should either be overturned due to fraud or it should be easy to cross check the fraud in the largest of democrat cities and find the very minimal amounts of votes needed for Trump.
I am also thinking about the comment made in Arizona over the weekend stating the Securities exchange commission and military fraud departments are involved in the audit. If the SEC is involved, my guess is they are tracing some transactions that took place and following the money. If that is the case and they can identify the source they could easily extend that source to other possible culprits involved in the other elections, thus ruling those states are all corrupt as well.
Or this is the only audit needed because Q has already let us know that they have it all. So following what Q has told us... This is just to match the evidence they already have and that will be enough to show the military that what they captured with their methods is in line with what the physical audit says it should be. That will give credence to the evidence they captured in other states being accurate as well.
Here is a scenario that fits your thoughts. AZ proves the statistical analysis by Dr. Frank, Bobby Pition, and others is valid. They can then either pinpoint the batches of ballots where the phony votes are, or possibly the States in question effectively surrender.
Plus AZ is probably a proving ground for Jovan Pulitzer’s high speed scanning tech. If it is proven effective, future audits will take a mere fraction of the time AZ did.
Looks to me that we already have enough for the POTUS election. Why stop though since we know similar circumstances are widespread. More than just the big 5 or so states. Candidate I supported for State Senate in my district in NY seemed to have lost by a small margin, I am not convinced especially as more info comes out. I think we have a big snowball headed downhill that will likely change results in local elections that we haven't considered yet. I've seen the "figures" and know the district well. Don't understand why my friend, Rob isn't sitting. Many others in a similar situation.
Not disagreeing. I don't see it feasible to audit every state or county to overturn the fraud. That would take years and each day is critical. There is more going on behind the scenes then we know.
I want to believe that once AZ confirms the steal that will be enough. If what Mike Lindell showed on absolute proof is legitimate then they already have the evidence. The audit being done in Arizona is matching the already known evidence to the physical evidence. This confirms that their results are accurate and should be enough to conclude what they captured was legitimate.
Agree. What we already know does seem to apply more broadly though.
Your original question was "needed" looks that we have it, yes. The rest will come out on it's own. Great post!
Once the AZ audit completes, won’t they have to go through the process of decertifying? Several more states will need to go through the same formal process in order for the official electoral count to show in trumps favor in order for the rest of the world to accept that Trump belongs in the whitehouse. Just because we have the evidence, doesn’t mean it will overturn for other states without other audits or processes to decertify.
If the military is the only way... I think AZ gives them the card to make their move. Right now they ran some unauthorized system, probably prototype that has never been used before. In order to act on the merits of the system they need confirmation of its legitimacy in use.
When AZ shows that the fraud their system captured was within a threshold of accuracy then they have the proof the system worked as designed and was not giving false results.
I think thats all they will need. They would not need the states to decertify anything. The states already committed treason. Therefore they have enough for military tribunals to lock up these shitbags.
Think of the election as a field test for their system. Our defense contractors have to test a system out before they install it permanently. Think of our missile defense system... those go through ground tests where missile are launched and shot out of the sky before we adopt the system. The 2020 election was their field test. Now they need confirmation that the results of that system are legitimate.
In the future this system will be adopted for use every election and there will not be shenanigans like we saw in the 2020 results.
I've got a feeling it's gonna take more. Definitely GA, PA sounds like it may.be soon. All the swing Srates need done When AZ and GA get corrected their senators will be unseated I think until special elections can be called. I hope I'm wrong but I think this is going at least 'til the fall. Ifilitary don't step in this won't be done before fall of 2022.
Part of the methodology used generally in audits (and Quality Control, generally) is that of a "representative sample" for example in a high-volume production environment, a sample rate of X percent for the inspection & testing of the product is an acceptable quantity to ensure the overall quality of all products.
If the current audit reveals a general or systemic method has been used, it is acceptable to apply these findings to other geographies.
a specific example would be, If the machines were all delivered with software that is designed to allocate votes at a ratio of 75% to one candidate and 125% to the other (as has been claimed) then it is a safe assumption that this was not isolated, but a systemic example of fraud that has been used in other geographies. Thus a full audit might not be needed in other States.