WHOA! WHAT!? Can anyone vouch for this?
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (228)
sorted by:
It's the most surefire way to ensure that evidence is presented in a court of law, and that the public will be able to see it.
I'm not sure if that's true. How could one provide evidence of something else entirely unrelated, in a criminal investigation?
This is the rub for me. He's being investigated for conduct prior to his presidency, like tax evasion etc. Why would a judge allow the defense to submit evidence unrelated to those things?