I hate to even copy what these evil people claim but every one should see this. They openly acknowledge that it is a ritual! They’re on the ropes to openly explain the evil they believe in. This needs to go to the Supreme Court so everyone can hear what these people believe. This is big.
"The abortion ritual (1) requires an abortion; and (2) affirms her religious subscription to TST's Third and Fifth Tenets. But before Ms. Doe can get her abortion–and therefore participate in the abortion ritual–the government has required that she get a sonogram… [ These ] requirements substantially interfere with Ms. Doe's religious beliefs and practices for two reasons. First, the requirements are a precondition to Ms. Doe's ability to participate in a religious ceremony. It is a substantial interference per se for the state to place a regulatory hurdle–one that costs money–in front of a religious exercise. The state might as well tax and regulate Mass."
The Supreme Court already made it clear that if every individual, regardless of religion, is refused a religious practice, then it does not interfere with religious conviction. Reynolds vs The United States.
The silent 3rd peaceful group of the Civil War was told they could not practice their religious convictions because it was written that all Americans could not practice it.
So it follows that if all Texans are not allowed an abortion, regardless of their "belief" that it would follow the precedent has been set. Doesn't really matter if God had told those people to follow a specific practice or not, government has set precedent & should continue to follow it.
I hate to even copy what these evil people claim but every one should see this. They openly acknowledge that it is a ritual! They’re on the ropes to openly explain the evil they believe in. This needs to go to the Supreme Court so everyone can hear what these people believe. This is big.
"The abortion ritual (1) requires an abortion; and (2) affirms her religious subscription to TST's Third and Fifth Tenets. But before Ms. Doe can get her abortion–and therefore participate in the abortion ritual–the government has required that she get a sonogram… [ These ] requirements substantially interfere with Ms. Doe's religious beliefs and practices for two reasons. First, the requirements are a precondition to Ms. Doe's ability to participate in a religious ceremony. It is a substantial interference per se for the state to place a regulatory hurdle–one that costs money–in front of a religious exercise. The state might as well tax and regulate Mass."
The Supreme Court already made it clear that if every individual, regardless of religion, is refused a religious practice, then it does not interfere with religious conviction. Reynolds vs The United States.
The silent 3rd peaceful group of the Civil War was told they could not practice their religious convictions because it was written that all Americans could not practice it.
So it follows that if all Texans are not allowed an abortion, regardless of their "belief" that it would follow the precedent has been set. Doesn't really matter if God had told those people to follow a specific practice or not, government has set precedent & should continue to follow it.