So my experience in working with volatile and toxic chemicals informs me that all these carcinogenic chemicals are dose related, i.e., it depends on how much exposure you have had. A swab can probably contain less than 1mg of EO, if that. And since ethylene is a volatile, it begins to evaporate when the packaging is opened.
My suggestion would be, if you're forced to be swabbed by one of these products, take a deep breath, hold it, endure the swab, then immediately blow your nose HARD and try to expel as much as you can.
People that I know that got tested have all said it's a very unpleasant experience and some said they felt sick and had headaches for days afterwards.. Me.. no test and felt great.. no mask wherever I could get away with it (damn near most places).
I would suppose a one off would not be so bad. However, instructions for medical devices are such that these need to be controlled for residue.
However, when you have to be tested 5 times a week, over the course of a year. ...
And in some countries, they are forcing kids to self test, at home, with this stuff, twice a week. They have to bring a negative result back otherwise they can't enter school.
Then add in SM102, which is in the covid jab. Of course, SM102 does not belong in aquatic environments, meaning bodies like ours. It is extremely toxic.
Add then all the other toxic stuff over the course of years of all the vaccines and the air pollution.
So if the boiling point is 56 degrees Fahrenheit, wouldn't that mean these test swabs would be free of Ethylene oxide if they are stored in room temperature?
This is a short video by a registered nurse, and federal medical investigator, who gives information on the swabs that are used to test people for Covid.
They are made in Chy-Na and are saturated with ethylene oxide, a chemical that the government itself has labeled carcinogenic.
It affects reproduction and can be fatal if inhaled. So why do they stick it up your nose? Is this part of the depopulation program?
This is, unfortunately, 99% bullshit. The good lady doesn't know what she is talking about.
Ethylene oxide (ETO) has been used at least since the 1970s as a sterilant for packaged medical items intended for sterile use within the human body. It is uniquely suitable for packaged items. The procedure is to put the packaged item in a sealed chamber and release a small canister volume of ETO into the chamber. The vapor will permeate THROUGH the packaging and sterilize both the package and the contents. After exposure the chamber is depressurized to vacuum and the ETO vapor is extracted. The medical item is NOT "drenched" in liquid ETO---a practical impossibility, since ETO will not remain liquid at room pressure and temperature. At all times, workers are prevented from being exposed to this material.
How do I know all this? I worked in the intraocular lens industry during the 1970s where this process was used. Successfully and safely, with no known problems from any patients receiving the intraocular lenses. The fact that it was ultimately declared a "carcinogen" in 2016 is a bureaucratic matter. One has to wonder what remaining process is now allowed and how effective that process is at providing a sterile good.
This is not to say that bulk ETO is mere dishwater. I had the unpleasant discovery of over a dozen canisters in a drawer of the desk that I was assigned when I joined the company. I knew that ETO was an energetic compound, sometimes used as a rocket monopropellant. I also sat down and figured out that if a canister was punctured, the gas would fill my office before I could get out of my chair and escape. I therefore made strong representations to my management that the ETO should be stored in a locked cabinet outside of spaces occupied by personnel. But this only goes to show that the safety of any item is totally controlled by the conditions of its use. (Does anybody know why it is a BAD IDEA to mix household ammonia and chlorine-based bleach? Yet these ingredients are commonly available to anyone in the household.)
The net result is that she does not understand how ETO is used as a sterilant, has a mistaken idea of the condition of the sterilized item, and uses her imagination to project unrealistic consequences to those who work with it. It is approximately equivalent to a panic over the health hazards of ethyl alcohol.
Also, I have reservations over any video that is mirror-image reversed. What's up with that?
So my experience in working with volatile and toxic chemicals informs me that all these carcinogenic chemicals are dose related, i.e., it depends on how much exposure you have had. A swab can probably contain less than 1mg of EO, if that. And since ethylene is a volatile, it begins to evaporate when the packaging is opened.
My suggestion would be, if you're forced to be swabbed by one of these products, take a deep breath, hold it, endure the swab, then immediately blow your nose HARD and try to expel as much as you can.
Have you actually read the safety precautions over a Lyondell? Especially when it concerns small doses?
No, I haven't read the MSDA's on any of these materials, particularly this one. What does the ethylene MSDA have to say about dose load and exposures?
These nasal swabs are a global attack,
not just Americans
If you can’t just spit on a swab, then why the need for masks?
People that I know that got tested have all said it's a very unpleasant experience and some said they felt sick and had headaches for days afterwards.. Me.. no test and felt great.. no mask wherever I could get away with it (damn near most places).
I would suppose a one off would not be so bad. However, instructions for medical devices are such that these need to be controlled for residue.
However, when you have to be tested 5 times a week, over the course of a year. ...
And in some countries, they are forcing kids to self test, at home, with this stuff, twice a week. They have to bring a negative result back otherwise they can't enter school.
Then add in SM102, which is in the covid jab. Of course, SM102 does not belong in aquatic environments, meaning bodies like ours. It is extremely toxic.
Add then all the other toxic stuff over the course of years of all the vaccines and the air pollution.
Things suddenly are adding up ain't they?
So if the boiling point is 56 degrees Fahrenheit, wouldn't that mean these test swabs would be free of Ethylene oxide if they are stored in room temperature?
They are free of ethylene oxide when they leave the factory.
swabs contain black moving strings. https://www.bitchute.com/video/0DujEYl657Xh/
swabs appear designed to break off particles in nose. https://files.catbox.moe/aszat6.mp4
WTF?!?
This is a short video by a registered nurse, and federal medical investigator, who gives information on the swabs that are used to test people for Covid.
They are made in Chy-Na and are saturated with ethylene oxide, a chemical that the government itself has labeled carcinogenic.
It affects reproduction and can be fatal if inhaled. So why do they stick it up your nose? Is this part of the depopulation program?
https://www.bitchute.com/video/WEBJHe6rPm7f/
This is, unfortunately, 99% bullshit. The good lady doesn't know what she is talking about.
Ethylene oxide (ETO) has been used at least since the 1970s as a sterilant for packaged medical items intended for sterile use within the human body. It is uniquely suitable for packaged items. The procedure is to put the packaged item in a sealed chamber and release a small canister volume of ETO into the chamber. The vapor will permeate THROUGH the packaging and sterilize both the package and the contents. After exposure the chamber is depressurized to vacuum and the ETO vapor is extracted. The medical item is NOT "drenched" in liquid ETO---a practical impossibility, since ETO will not remain liquid at room pressure and temperature. At all times, workers are prevented from being exposed to this material.
How do I know all this? I worked in the intraocular lens industry during the 1970s where this process was used. Successfully and safely, with no known problems from any patients receiving the intraocular lenses. The fact that it was ultimately declared a "carcinogen" in 2016 is a bureaucratic matter. One has to wonder what remaining process is now allowed and how effective that process is at providing a sterile good.
This is not to say that bulk ETO is mere dishwater. I had the unpleasant discovery of over a dozen canisters in a drawer of the desk that I was assigned when I joined the company. I knew that ETO was an energetic compound, sometimes used as a rocket monopropellant. I also sat down and figured out that if a canister was punctured, the gas would fill my office before I could get out of my chair and escape. I therefore made strong representations to my management that the ETO should be stored in a locked cabinet outside of spaces occupied by personnel. But this only goes to show that the safety of any item is totally controlled by the conditions of its use. (Does anybody know why it is a BAD IDEA to mix household ammonia and chlorine-based bleach? Yet these ingredients are commonly available to anyone in the household.)
The net result is that she does not understand how ETO is used as a sterilant, has a mistaken idea of the condition of the sterilized item, and uses her imagination to project unrealistic consequences to those who work with it. It is approximately equivalent to a panic over the health hazards of ethyl alcohol.
Also, I have reservations over any video that is mirror-image reversed. What's up with that?
Nose... Ass... for butt-headed sheeple, same difference.