For what it’s worth, I think there is an equal chance that :
the vaccine is glorified saline water and does nothing bc the rna packets degrade prior to passing to the cytoplasm and coding for spike proteins;
the vaccine is dangerous and will lead to
auto immune disease or other casualties for a decent percentage of the vaccinated;
the vaccine is an effective means of providing short term protection and/or immunity from the wuhan flu; or
the vaccine will provide long term immunity.
I think there is a 100% chance that nobody knows which of the above 4 scenarios is most likely to be correct in the long term.
WHY THE F*** WOULD I GET A GENE THERAPY THAT MAY OR MAY NOT BE DANGEROUS IF THE SURVIVAL RATE IS
99.9%+??? Seems like a fairly simple risk- reward analysis
For what it’s worth, I think there is an equal chance that :
I think there is a 100% chance that nobody knows which of the above 4 scenarios is most likely to be correct in the long term.
WHY THE F*** WOULD I GET A GENE THERAPY THAT MAY OR MAY NOT BE DANGEROUS IF THE SURVIVAL RATE IS 99.9%+??? Seems like a fairly simple risk- reward analysis
the vaccine will cause rapid mutations of the CCP virus and those that received it will be the vectors of transmission.
We're already seeing enough data that prove #3 and #4 are shit in your example.
We've heard reports of saline being given out at some pharmacies and rumors that the MIL replaced some batches with saline but outside that, unsure.
I think it's a mix of #1 and 2 based on the data we're seeing.