Do you guys remember a vector for a cyber attack was loading a backdoor onto a usb drive and leaving them scattered around the parking lot of the target? (This is from Mr. Robot)
Ok so, picture this analogy. Instead of a usb drive, we have this synringe with some kind of solution in it.
We're always told never insert an unknown USB drive in company laptops to protect it from attacks, however taking this shot, is like someone claiming "expert" in a lab coat, who has never tested it, picking it up off the ground and administering it to people.
The coding for the spike protetin was provided by the researchers at Wuhan, and hasn't been tested.
For what it’s worth, I think there is an equal chance that :
the vaccine is glorified saline water and does nothing bc the rna packets degrade prior to passing to the cytoplasm and coding for spike proteins;
the vaccine is dangerous and will lead to
auto immune disease or other casualties for a decent percentage of the vaccinated;
the vaccine is an effective means of providing short term protection and/or immunity from the wuhan flu; or
the vaccine will provide long term immunity.
I think there is a 100% chance that nobody knows which of the above 4 scenarios is most likely to be correct in the long term.
WHY THE F*** WOULD I GET A GENE THERAPY THAT MAY OR MAY NOT BE DANGEROUS IF THE SURVIVAL RATE IS
99.9%+??? Seems like a fairly simple risk- reward analysis
Do you guys remember a vector for a cyber attack was loading a backdoor onto a usb drive and leaving them scattered around the parking lot of the target? (This is from Mr. Robot)
Ok so, picture this analogy. Instead of a usb drive, we have this synringe with some kind of solution in it.
We're always told never insert an unknown USB drive in company laptops to protect it from attacks, however taking this shot, is like someone claiming "expert" in a lab coat, who has never tested it, picking it up off the ground and administering it to people.
The coding for the spike protetin was provided by the researchers at Wuhan, and hasn't been tested.
Good luck with that.
For what it’s worth, I think there is an equal chance that :
I think there is a 100% chance that nobody knows which of the above 4 scenarios is most likely to be correct in the long term.
WHY THE F*** WOULD I GET A GENE THERAPY THAT MAY OR MAY NOT BE DANGEROUS IF THE SURVIVAL RATE IS 99.9%+??? Seems like a fairly simple risk- reward analysis
We're already seeing enough data that prove #3 and #4 are shit in your example.
We've heard reports of saline being given out at some pharmacies and rumors that the MIL replaced some batches with saline but outside that, unsure.
I think it's a mix of #1 and 2 based on the data we're seeing.