If a baby car seat fails and kills (1) baby the whole works is
scrapped & recalled followed by a lawsuit -- but if a vaccine kill 5K+ ..... Fuck it ! Keep pushing the jab !!! Fuck em
Or if an airliner control system fails and 346 passengers are killed in two crashes, do we just shrug and keep on boarding them, because the events are "rare"? (ref. 737 MAX catastrophes). Strange how the government put that product on total hold while the causes and corrections were worked to the nth degree. Not one more death is allowable. But vaccine...it's a shooting gallery. Walk right up!
VAERS data isn't cases from the vaccine, just all cases after having taken it. So your analogy is incorrect, because it would be perfectly normal for a few thousand people to die after hundreds of millions went on a flight. You wouldn't blame the airline for someone dropping dead in a car accident a week later, right? That's what you're doing if you think VAERS data shows the vaccines killed 5k. It's just wrong.
Not really. It's cases that correlate with the vaccine. And with the very low reporting rate, one might expect that those reporting feel very strongly about the correlation.
Hypotheses are formulated upon correlation. If true science existed then this hypothesis would be subjected to the scientific process.
"Vaccine providers are encouraged to report any clinically significant health problem following vaccination to VAERS, whether or not they believe the vaccine was the cause."
Straight from VAERS. So no, they don't need to feel strongly, they are told to report it even if they don't.
If a baby car seat fails and kills (1) baby the whole works is scrapped & recalled followed by a lawsuit -- but if a vaccine kill 5K+ ..... Fuck it ! Keep pushing the jab !!! Fuck em
Or if an airliner control system fails and 346 passengers are killed in two crashes, do we just shrug and keep on boarding them, because the events are "rare"? (ref. 737 MAX catastrophes). Strange how the government put that product on total hold while the causes and corrections were worked to the nth degree. Not one more death is allowable. But vaccine...it's a shooting gallery. Walk right up!
VAERS data isn't cases from the vaccine, just all cases after having taken it. So your analogy is incorrect, because it would be perfectly normal for a few thousand people to die after hundreds of millions went on a flight. You wouldn't blame the airline for someone dropping dead in a car accident a week later, right? That's what you're doing if you think VAERS data shows the vaccines killed 5k. It's just wrong.
Not really. It's cases that correlate with the vaccine. And with the very low reporting rate, one might expect that those reporting feel very strongly about the correlation.
Hypotheses are formulated upon correlation. If true science existed then this hypothesis would be subjected to the scientific process.
"Vaccine providers are encouraged to report any clinically significant health problem following vaccination to VAERS, whether or not they believe the vaccine was the cause."
Straight from VAERS. So no, they don't need to feel strongly, they are told to report it even if they don't.