Sorry pal, but it would NOT be "perfectly normal" for a few thousand people to die after even hundreds of millions of passenger-flights, as a result of a design flaw. You have a mistaken view of the airline and airplane industries.
It is generally understood that VAERS undersamples the events reported, because they are self-reported. Crank the numbers up by a factor of 100 and you might be closer to the truth.
My point is that the government rightly put the kibosh on the 737 MAX after 346 fatalities, and didn't let up until there was convincing evidence that the flaw had been corrected. NO such diligence regarding the vaccine. (It also turns out that the vaccine companies have histories either of unethical product practices or a complete lack of relevant experience in producing the vaccine.)
You're missing the point entirely, "pal." As I've said over and over again, VAERS deaths are not conclusively linked to the vaccine. So your idea about a design flaw is entirely wrong, it doesn't make sense. The government put the kibosh on the 737 because it was the obvious cause of those deaths. The government wouldn't have stopped the 737 if .000017% of people got sick a week after they flew, because that's nonsense. VAERS deaths are NOT conclusively linked to the vaccine, and that's just reality. Why is that so hard to understand?
Sorry pal, but it would NOT be "perfectly normal" for a few thousand people to die after even hundreds of millions of passenger-flights, as a result of a design flaw. You have a mistaken view of the airline and airplane industries.
It is generally understood that VAERS undersamples the events reported, because they are self-reported. Crank the numbers up by a factor of 100 and you might be closer to the truth.
My point is that the government rightly put the kibosh on the 737 MAX after 346 fatalities, and didn't let up until there was convincing evidence that the flaw had been corrected. NO such diligence regarding the vaccine. (It also turns out that the vaccine companies have histories either of unethical product practices or a complete lack of relevant experience in producing the vaccine.)
You're missing the point entirely, "pal." As I've said over and over again, VAERS deaths are not conclusively linked to the vaccine. So your idea about a design flaw is entirely wrong, it doesn't make sense. The government put the kibosh on the 737 because it was the obvious cause of those deaths. The government wouldn't have stopped the 737 if .000017% of people got sick a week after they flew, because that's nonsense. VAERS deaths are NOT conclusively linked to the vaccine, and that's just reality. Why is that so hard to understand?