While this is posted, read 11.2.3 carefully then read it again, and a third time for even better understanding.
Seems like it was written with the US specifically in mind, does it not?
Very carefully worded. In the cases of the US, DC would be occupied while the States are not - meaning they continue to function. In the case of State in on the treason (Michigan, Georgia, Pennsylvania, et. al.), the capital of those States can be isolated while the State, again, still functions as normal.
Hmm. If Biden and Harris are themselves aware that they are only occupying Washington DC, would that affect which states they would be willing to travel to, since they would be moving into dangerous territory? Could that be a reason why Harris has been avoiding travelling to the border? I wonder.
"The question of whether territory is occupied does not depend upon the issuance of any particular proclamation or other instrument. Territory may be occupied even though no proclamation of occupation has been issued."
Jeez this one is really wild...there is so much going on that my first instinct is to discount it....but then I read it and so much makes sense that the other part of me cant discount it.......
Yeah thought that too, maybe one without footnotes at bottom of each page but an appendix or something? Just figured I’d point it out maybe OP knows more.
While this is posted, read 11.2.3 carefully then read it again, and a third time for even better understanding.
Seems like it was written with the US specifically in mind, does it not?
Very carefully worded. In the cases of the US, DC would be occupied while the States are not - meaning they continue to function. In the case of State in on the treason (Michigan, Georgia, Pennsylvania, et. al.), the capital of those States can be isolated while the State, again, still functions as normal.
D.c. was already occupied for the past 100 years. It's a foreign entity not owned by the U.S. A. Sounds dumb but it's true.
Hmm. If Biden and Harris are themselves aware that they are only occupying Washington DC, would that affect which states they would be willing to travel to, since they would be moving into dangerous territory? Could that be a reason why Harris has been avoiding travelling to the border? I wonder.
11.2.4 is interesting as to DC.
"The question of whether territory is occupied does not depend upon the issuance of any particular proclamation or other instrument. Territory may be occupied even though no proclamation of occupation has been issued."
https://twitter.com/chuckgrassley/status/1400600211274227714?s=21
https://twitter.com/mikepompeo/status/1400545519039094791?s=21
Law of War
"COMMON SENSE"... that's trippy!
Is "Bring the PAIN" also a hidden reference to Thomas Paine?
Please sir, can I have some MOAR!
Jeez this one is really wild...there is so much going on that my first instinct is to discount it....but then I read it and so much makes sense that the other part of me cant discount it.......
Well, who was next to Pence and potus? Pic sux
I think that's Admiral Mike Rogers, the one who warned President Trump about Obama Admin spying on his campaign.
Nicely done fren, great work.
DOD Law of War Manual I’m seeing on page 748 is 10.33.1.1, 11.2.2.3 is on 766, maybe I’m missing something.
I'd have to wonder which version they are using as even a slight modification will skew the page numbers.
Yeah thought that too, maybe one without footnotes at bottom of each page but an appendix or something? Just figured I’d point it out maybe OP knows more.
The Law of War ... and here I thought JAG lawyers just went after soldiers trying to mail a jeep home in pieces. This manual is a work of art.
OK i kinda get the red, but everything else is just random connecting straws, surely?