Holy shit, the 11.3 law of war theory is true. Can't believe I missed this
(media.greatawakening.win)
NCSWIC
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (172)
sorted by:
I still think it's a stretch. Virtually every use of 11.3 and 11.11 that the "decoder" used to justify his theory was a date cherrypicked out of context. The simple explanation is that Q is just saying that the Democrats and China were going to rig the election together on 11/3.
The [D] in that post is referring to domestic, not Democrats. Q Post 4871 clearly gives reference to [Domestic] in relation to the upcoming election.
Q never rarely gives dates on anything and when they do the months are written out (see Q4842, 4835, 4817 as examples).
Q Post 4889 in which the following was linked gave a good indication of where this was going:
https://www.theusconstitution.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/The-Text-and-History-of-the-Foreign-Emoluments-Clause.pdf
This specifically deals with foreign involvement with US government representatives, which ties in well with Section 11 of the US_MIL LoW Manual.
Lastly, Q posts 4821 and 4822 make it pretty clear what is coming. In both those posts, it is talking about foreign powers controlling the White House which, by definition of the LoW Manual, makes it a belligerent government.
Agreed. Not to mention the manual is being interpreted incorrectly.
Which parts specifically have been mis-interpreted?
11.3 of the US_MIL LoW Manual talk about 11.3 being the END of occupation of a belligerent government.
The Manual defines a belligerent government as one either made up of an Occupying Power or an Occupying Power having the State operating on behalf of a hostile power.
So what would make the current Federal Government belligerent?
1.) A country makes itself an enemy of the US by attacking the US - like say with a bio-logical weapon.
2.) This will automatically produce a declaration of war without Congressional approval as the US was attacked on US soil.
3.) That same country is involved in stealing the election (i.e., China) is shown to have installed the current government making it fit definition 2 of the LoW Manual.
What most miss in the interpretation is that 11.3 refers to the CONCLUSION of the military removing an occupied power. In context of what is going on in the US, it means when the illegitimate government in DC has been removed and the rightful President is back in power.
This is what Q has always meant when they said "when 11.3 verifies" or "slated to occur on 11.3". That is, when the legitimate President is back in power, all hell is going to break loose on the traitors of the nation.
Not to mention that the DoD cut off public access to the manual. Q is a military intelligence operation, so I interpret that as them signaling to us that it's a red herring.
Law of War Manual is still easily accessible to the public.
https://dod.defense.gov/Portals/1/Documents/pubs/DoD%20Law%20of%20War%20Manual%20-%20June%202015%20Updated%20Dec%202016.pdf?ver=2016-12-13-172036-190