terrorists showing how easy it was to take down a plane, that would destroy the airline industry
naval maneuvers and a rogue missile unintentionally took out the plane
The interesting thing I recall is that Boeing pushed back at the idea it was an explosion of the fuel tank. That makes them liable and I don't think that was ever proven in court.
Even Michael Medved, who did weekly shows 'debunking' conspiracy theories, did not buy the official story on this one. IMO, this was the height of the DS power - of getting away with crap and the GOP and media not only did nothing, but got on board with the bogus official stories. The Clinton era is what red pilled me.
Vince Foster supposedly commits suicide by putting a gun in his mouth and firing but there is not a spec of blood on his long sleeve, white dress shirt.
Waco - FLIR video shows the feds fired into the compound but it is dismissed as sunlight flickering of the gun barrels.
OKC - full story was covered up
Ron Brown - bullet hole in his head and AG Reno says no evidence to demand any investigation.
I watched the 2013 documentary "TWA Flight 800" last night and I couldn't believe how blatant the cover up was. I was pretty unfamiliar with the events bc I was a kid back then so I went in expecting a few eyewitness testimonies. There are hundreds! Not to mention the evidence gathered from the rubble & remains do not align with the official story at all.
Def agree that this era does seem like the a turning point for the DS. The lies of the Clinton admin are so blatant in retrospect - and maybe they were at the time - but news & information was more centralized so it was tougher for "fringe" free thinkers to come together & say wtf.
My old girlfriend, impeccable integrity, told me her boss was out in Long Island on a boat and saw something go up and hit the plane. The CIA explanation of what hundreds of eyewitnesses like that thought they saw is laughable. And what the hell is the CIA doing in any of this investigation? Not their jurisdiction.
Commander Donaldson, I believe was the name, was at the forefront of exposing this travesty. He died a long time ago but he had a website and a lot of research. He was the hub of getting to the bottom of it.
I know! The doc I watched didn't explore possible "why's." It was strictly fact based, but I would love to hear some theories. Shot by a missile 12 mins after take off from JFK. Not at all discrete.
Lots of us were out on the beach that evening. We know what we saw. The question is, who was on that flight?
Some other theories that were floated back then:
terrorists showing how easy it was to take down a plane, that would destroy the airline industry
naval maneuvers and a rogue missile unintentionally took out the plane
The interesting thing I recall is that Boeing pushed back at the idea it was an explosion of the fuel tank. That makes them liable and I don't think that was ever proven in court.
It sure seems hilarious in hindsight, but there was a time when a lot of us would have bought their narrative.
So true. Glass half full - look how far we've come! Much more awake to a forced DS narrative.
Even Michael Medved, who did weekly shows 'debunking' conspiracy theories, did not buy the official story on this one. IMO, this was the height of the DS power - of getting away with crap and the GOP and media not only did nothing, but got on board with the bogus official stories. The Clinton era is what red pilled me.
Vince Foster supposedly commits suicide by putting a gun in his mouth and firing but there is not a spec of blood on his long sleeve, white dress shirt.
Waco - FLIR video shows the feds fired into the compound but it is dismissed as sunlight flickering of the gun barrels.
OKC - full story was covered up
Ron Brown - bullet hole in his head and AG Reno says no evidence to demand any investigation.
et al
I watched the 2013 documentary "TWA Flight 800" last night and I couldn't believe how blatant the cover up was. I was pretty unfamiliar with the events bc I was a kid back then so I went in expecting a few eyewitness testimonies. There are hundreds! Not to mention the evidence gathered from the rubble & remains do not align with the official story at all.
Def agree that this era does seem like the a turning point for the DS. The lies of the Clinton admin are so blatant in retrospect - and maybe they were at the time - but news & information was more centralized so it was tougher for "fringe" free thinkers to come together & say wtf.
My old girlfriend, impeccable integrity, told me her boss was out in Long Island on a boat and saw something go up and hit the plane. The CIA explanation of what hundreds of eyewitnesses like that thought they saw is laughable. And what the hell is the CIA doing in any of this investigation? Not their jurisdiction.
Commander Donaldson, I believe was the name, was at the forefront of exposing this travesty. He died a long time ago but he had a website and a lot of research. He was the hub of getting to the bottom of it.
Hey great recommendation, thank you! I found a collection of Commander Donaldson's work. He was not featured in the doc.
The real question is, who was or were the target(s) on that fight that Hillary wanted dead?
I know! The doc I watched didn't explore possible "why's." It was strictly fact based, but I would love to hear some theories. Shot by a missile 12 mins after take off from JFK. Not at all discrete.
I remember this and own the book. Totally shot down. Such horsehit.