There appears to be a blood clotting activity and damage to the cardiovascular system by the spike proteins in the vaccinated.

Agreed. I have been saying this for months, and I have spoken on why this is likely the case (recent evidence suggests I was likely correct in January). This is in vaccinated people. For that there is substantial evidence.

I have been getting blood circulation and heart issues recently around my vaccinated family, and GA members have reported having the same issues

I hate to say it, but this is not evidence. Fear is a very strong motivator, and psychosomatic injury, especially in the cardiovasculature is very real. My aunt killed herself with fear. She was so afraid of a heart surgery she died of heart failure the day before. Not a heart attack, her heart just stopped. She scared herself to death.

The spike protein transmission or shedding remains a suspect.

Not to me. Please see my posts in this thread. I don't want to have to go through it all again here today. I have a bunch of posts in the link.

Doctors who know way more than us, who know about menstrual sympathy, are not saying it's that; they are saying it looks like spike protein transmission/shedding.

They do not know more than I do. In fact quite the opposite is true from what I have heard them say.

I am a researcher in cell biology and bio-nanotechnology in a field related to the vaccines (cell specific targeting drug delivery systems). I know a fair bit about what is going on. The MDs that I have heard are more likely to get things wrong about the cell biology and vaccine technology than right, at least in the finer details (which are very important in this case).

That doesn't mean all of them are wrong. There are a few that have been linked to on this board that absolutely know their shit. But none of the ones that I have seen that have talked about shedding do. They always make mistakes in the basics of cell biology or the tech. Having the title of Doctor means you made it through med school. Cell biology is not a big topic there. They only need to pass a basic class. They don't need to actually know anything. As for the technology of the vaccines, they literally have to know squat to be an MD.

People are always assigning their critical thinking skills over to "experts". If those experts are saying things that agree with the persons fears, they think they are correct. People are afraid of these unknown technologies, so when an "expert" says something might be happening our ears perk up.

There are many, many problems with the vaccines. I have talked about them many times. They are dangerous, and almost certainly more harmful than the virus itself. But that does not mean every thing someone thinks is wrong with them has validity.

As someone who works on these systems, spike protein shedding has no biological path to exist that I am aware of, and I am aware of a whole lot more than any doctor I have heard speak on it.

That is a protocol definition not evidence of an event.

In that vaccine protocol they include protocols to look for vaccine shedding. This is because real vaccines are made out of viruses. Real viral vaccines can absolutely shed. That is why vaccine protocols include these specific protocols.

The Pfizer mRNA vaccine is NOT a viral vaccine. It has absolutely nothing to do with a viral vaccine. That does not mean there can't be off target effects. Such effects should absolutely be looked for. But this protocol definition is not evidence that any off target effects have been found.

Still, we should keep an eye out for off target effects. There is evidence that there may be off target effects. But off target effects are not necessarily vaccine shedding by the definition of that term, They most certainly are not evidence of SARS S protein shedding in any way, shape or form.

Please stop calling something "science" when I am asking for evidence to support your statement.