So how would you debunk this? You just gonna brush it off as coincidence that he used the exact words of the Q post with a time stamp matching up exactly with the post that Q quoted? If only one of those connections was present id be skeptical too but two direct connections is very hard to brush off.
Yes, but the twit is the exact time and current so all the Q team had to do was make sure that the twit was the same time in the Q post, either post, Q's or the anon.
Post-2035 is - https://qposts.online/?q=2035&s=postnum -- associated twitter post here -- https://twitter.com/RandyRRQuaid/status/1035509816335187969 -- think they just did a keyword search in which they found -- in which case there are 5, so basically they are grabbing at straws, either way here are the 5 posts containing "Peace through strength" - 1751, 1609, 1350, 1026, and 972. Now a person could apply those to the Law of War manual but I'm not going to LoLz.
Trump and mike make a great team
Isn't the 20:35 post by an Anon though, not Q? Sorry if I'm wrong, I'm not sure how the kun works
Q uses whatever works to show the proof. This one is simple but undeniable.
So how would you debunk this? You just gonna brush it off as coincidence that he used the exact words of the Q post with a time stamp matching up exactly with the post that Q quoted? If only one of those connections was present id be skeptical too but two direct connections is very hard to brush off.
Learn to read the COMMS.
If there wasn't plausible deniability to the COMMS then far more people would pick up on the subtleties.
still a redonkulous "coincidence"
It is, but it's quoted by Q
Yes, but the twit is the exact time and current so all the Q team had to do was make sure that the twit was the same time in the Q post, either post, Q's or the anon.
ok thanks all!
The man couldn't wait 6 more minutes?
Post-2035 is - https://qposts.online/?q=2035&s=postnum -- associated twitter post here -- https://twitter.com/RandyRRQuaid/status/1035509816335187969 -- think they just did a keyword search in which they found -- in which case there are 5, so basically they are grabbing at straws, either way here are the 5 posts containing "Peace through strength" - 1751, 1609, 1350, 1026, and 972. Now a person could apply those to the Law of War manual but I'm not going to LoLz.
Sorry, who is 'they' in "they just did a keyword search..."? Your comment is confusing. What are you trying to say?
The implication is that it's all confirmation bias.
Shills are getting more subtle.
There’s no relationship between the time .....
WWG1WGA
You need to learn comms and plausible deniability, then come back and try again.
"No relationship between the time"
Except, you know, the timestamps being the same.
Ahhhhh Grasshoppa, a stretch to say the least!
Two direct connections in one post. How exactly is that a stretch?
You pick a time an Anon posted and tie it to Pompeo!!! Not likely!
Q quoted it. The anon post is IN the Q post.
"Qompeo" its kind of ketchy...
Excellent Connection, Good Job!