Can you point me to any please? I am not afraid to change my mind, but I don't have time to research everything. In general, video evidence is hard to beat.
But you're not drawing evidence from the video, you're drawing your own conclusion. You believe without proof.
I'm not here to do your homework for you, but if you choose to believe in something just because someone told you it happened one way, then you're no better than the people who just regurgitate MSM talking points.
No, I watched the footage and came to my own conclusion. I am better than the MSM believers because I pored through that video evidence, then I considered lots of other opinions to see if there was something I missed, then I fitted the event into my current understanding of politics.
I couldn't do any more in a reasonable time. I used the data and analysis I have access to, and you have shown me no reason to reconsider any of my current conclusions.
But you're not drawing evidence from the video, you're drawing your own conclusion. You believe without proof.
Quit with your gaslighting! I know how I came to my conclusions.
You are trying to invalidate my conclusion without giving me any reason. I question why it is important to you that I agree with you. Are you some sort of beginner glowie? There must be some glowies around here.
Mkay, but you realize there's more you can look at from that footage right? There are named people in the footage, who have families and relatives, who have given interviews. If what you're saying is true, then all of this information would need to be fabricated as well. If I were you, I'd want to dig further. It just seems odd to me that you don't.
Essentially what you're doing is looking at a story from only one angle, when you need to open your eyes and see from other perspectives.
Like, it wouldn't make sense at all to stage the death of a person, only to kill her later, and not kill any of the others involved. If she's a loose end, why aren't the others in the video? WOuldn't they have been "suicided" as well? It makes no sense this way.
You seem to have come to your conclusions by believing what others tell you and show you, instead of doing concrete research.
I don't believe she was killed later, I was just suggesting it was possible and why someone would be motivated to do it. Pure conjecture.
Why on earth would they kill the others who were there? They are not causing trouble. To kill any of them would arouse suspicion. It would not be strategic.
You seem to have come to your conclusions by believing what others tell you and show you, instead of doing concrete research.
Gaslighting again. I told you I didn't do this.
Why are you so exercised about what I think anyway ?
Can you point me to any please? I am not afraid to change my mind, but I don't have time to research everything. In general, video evidence is hard to beat.
But you're not drawing evidence from the video, you're drawing your own conclusion. You believe without proof.
I'm not here to do your homework for you, but if you choose to believe in something just because someone told you it happened one way, then you're no better than the people who just regurgitate MSM talking points.
No, I watched the footage and came to my own conclusion. I am better than the MSM believers because I pored through that video evidence, then I considered lots of other opinions to see if there was something I missed, then I fitted the event into my current understanding of politics.
I couldn't do any more in a reasonable time. I used the data and analysis I have access to, and you have shown me no reason to reconsider any of my current conclusions.
Quit with your gaslighting! I know how I came to my conclusions.
You are trying to invalidate my conclusion without giving me any reason. I question why it is important to you that I agree with you. Are you some sort of beginner glowie? There must be some glowies around here.
Get thee hence!
Mkay, but you realize there's more you can look at from that footage right? There are named people in the footage, who have families and relatives, who have given interviews. If what you're saying is true, then all of this information would need to be fabricated as well. If I were you, I'd want to dig further. It just seems odd to me that you don't.
Essentially what you're doing is looking at a story from only one angle, when you need to open your eyes and see from other perspectives.
Like, it wouldn't make sense at all to stage the death of a person, only to kill her later, and not kill any of the others involved. If she's a loose end, why aren't the others in the video? WOuldn't they have been "suicided" as well? It makes no sense this way.
You seem to have come to your conclusions by believing what others tell you and show you, instead of doing concrete research.
I don't believe she was killed later, I was just suggesting it was possible and why someone would be motivated to do it. Pure conjecture.
Why on earth would they kill the others who were there? They are not causing trouble. To kill any of them would arouse suspicion. It would not be strategic.
Gaslighting again. I told you I didn't do this.
Why are you so exercised about what I think anyway ?