I mean here's my thing with charging people with reason and sedition. If the election was stolen they legitimately did commit treason. Let me explain.

1. The government is elected by the people. The majority are the true leaders of the government in a popular form of government like a constitutional republic or a democracy. The majority are the national sovereigns in this system. In a pure monarchy it would be the King and/or royal family who are the national sovereigns in a dictatorship the dictator is the national sovereign.

2. What would happen traditionally if you prevented the national sovereigns' right to exercise their own control of their government? You would be tried for treason.

3. Why is preventing the majority's right to control their government through the vote any different from preventing a king's right to control his own government?

4. There is no difference.

5. If it is found that domestic enemies have prevented the majority, who are the national sovereigns in their constitutional republic, from exercising control over their government and it's interests then this is treason equal to usurping a monarch's power.

6. If the majority find it necessary to try these domestic enemies on charges of treason in a court of law then that is the national sovereigns' will.

It is treason in it's truest sense. These domestic enemies will have you believe they are the government. They are not. The majority puts them there. Joe Biden is no more the government that some piece of roadkill on the side of a row. These domestic enemies will tell you that they did not commit treason because treason is only committed against a king. This is not true. Treason happens when domestic enemies act against the will of the national sovereigns. Who ever they may be. It is treason by definition it is. The king is the state in a monarchy. The majority of people are the state in a popular form of government.