I’m just curious about it. I’d like feedback
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (44)
sorted by:
It isn't very good for my research purposes.
I have a hard time restricting it to a "------" operator to guarantee the indexed articles have relevant info.
I've resorted to setting Google to only show articles pre-2010, which does a decent enough job of skimming the desperate CIA/FBI programming narratives off the top.
Not to be confrontational, but: a Google search setting is enough to outsmart the cabal's Google programming?
Usually, this is the case.
But every algorithm has its flaws.
When you automate things, there are always compounding gaps in tolerance thresholds.
Let me put it this way:
For example, if I were to have a machine mark an infinitely long rope every 10 feet, and it is off by 0.17% of an inch, that means every 5890 feet of rope will be off an entire 10ft length of rope.
If a 17,670 foot long wall had the same margin of error, there would be 3 10foot gaps in it I can just waltz through.
All I gotta do is keep bashing my head against the search engine using different combinations of words surrounding the ones they try to censor and bob's your uncle.
aka google-fu, gosh, that takes me back ;)