When you automate things, there are always compounding gaps in tolerance thresholds.
Let me put it this way:
For example, if I were to have a machine mark an infinitely long rope every 10 feet, and it is off by 0.17% of an inch, that means every 5890 feet of rope will be off an entire 10ft length of rope.
If a 17,670 foot long wall had the same margin of error, there would be 3 10foot gaps in it I can just waltz through.
All I gotta do is keep bashing my head against the search engine using different combinations of words surrounding the ones they try to censor and bob's your uncle.
Not to be confrontational, but: a Google search setting is enough to outsmart the cabal's Google programming?
Usually, this is the case.
But every algorithm has its flaws.
When you automate things, there are always compounding gaps in tolerance thresholds.
Let me put it this way:
For example, if I were to have a machine mark an infinitely long rope every 10 feet, and it is off by 0.17% of an inch, that means every 5890 feet of rope will be off an entire 10ft length of rope.
If a 17,670 foot long wall had the same margin of error, there would be 3 10foot gaps in it I can just waltz through.
All I gotta do is keep bashing my head against the search engine using different combinations of words surrounding the ones they try to censor and bob's your uncle.
aka google-fu, gosh, that takes me back ;)