Racial and geographical differences are often highlighted to divide us. If we're too busy squabbling with each other, how are we going to focus on the real problems? Idgaf if you're white, brown, yellow, or red, if you're against the Deep State and the exploitation of children, we're likely on the same team.
It's one thing to point out demographics for identification/clarification, but when they start using race as a justification/explanation for things, it's likely a glowie or someone stirring up trouble. They fear us all working together.
I find that just repeating, a mantra of whose interests are best served if the rest of us are at each other's throats is a good way to at least get people to stop and think.
On the other hand who's interest is it in to continually import foreigners who share no American values?
Do you agree that this is a deliberate chess move against you?
Now ask yourself, are you playing against the pieces, or are you playing the hand that moves the pieces? You're busy worrying about the color of the pawns, when the hand moving them doesn't give two shits.
Or we trap/distract/sandbox/nullify the pawn and continue to go for the DS player's throat (...this isn't a normal game of chess). If the pawn wakes up at some time, becoming a queen/player for our side, then awesome! If not, then they can stay in the trapped/distracted/sandboxed/nullified condition we put on them until whenever.
The whole demoncrap game plan (and the DS) is to divide and conquer. Separate us into different offended groups. It can be social, religious, monetary, race, or any other. I refuse to play their game.
People don't naturally integrate. Black people don't like acting white, white people don't get into acting black.
All government insistence that you ''integrate'' actually means ''GET RID OF YOUR WHITENESS and your CHRISTIANITY and HAVING any STANDARDS for BEHAVIOR at ALL.
People sort themselves out, and I agree with you on the second portion as well, but do you ever wonder why they go through all the effort? It has nothing to do with race. As long as you keep falling for this sleight of hand, your anger will be directed in the wrong direction.
I just saw your stupid ass write ''should have went'' in a string of words you thought were a sentence in another post you made.
You need to shut the fuck up about what others here think until you can figure out a question mark goes at the end of ''Could you tell if you were triggered.''
You're another illiterate from the public school system trying to pretend you had an original, and deep thought, once.
or maybe White people are sick of being called racist and having our entire country overrun with illegal immigrants and favored status given to minority racial groups, excluding our merit based reward system.
Knowing it's all a psyop doesn't help much.
Walk into south Detroit and tell the blacks your thoughts. See how it goes.
You missed the point. Let’s contemplate your response.
What does South Detroit have to do with the machinations of an international political scheme to undermine western culture? You need to understand that the resentment which you just expressed is already accounted for, especially by those who craft these dubious narratives. Instead of directing your energy and focus upon changing the long established and well fortified machine which created, perpetuated, and actively reinforces the conditions which haunt South Detroit, you instead chose to pay mind to the lowly miserable demons who exist only as a product of the machine.
People who share your perception have a tendency to recognize subversive conditions only when they target your collective identity, but in that same perception do not extend or afford those same grievances to another group.
You also sound like a pretentious douchebag, speaking in platitudes. Just what are the 'conditions which HAUNT South Detriot'?:
Instead of directing your energy and focus upon changing the long established and well fortified machine which created, perpetuated, and actively reinforces the conditions which haunt South Detroit, you instead chose to pay mind to the lowly miserable demons who exist only as a product of the machine.
Damn if that doesn't sound Obama or Harris! Spoiler Alert >> IT'S SYSTEMIC RACISM << LMFAO!
Again, go to South Detroit and speak to them this way. You'll get your neo-intellectual ass kicked in. Here, I'll just label you an obnoxious phony.
South Detroit is the reflection of Black urban culture, buddy. Just like Crenshaw, Carson and Compton. This is who they are. Blacks who had the work ethic and good sense to escape the imagined prisons of Black urban centers know exactly what I'm talking about.
It’s really sad that you couldn’t refrain from spiraling.
Along with your childlike susceptibility to propaganda, all you’ve managed to prove is your shallow understanding of any relevant topic related to this subject. Before I educated myself on the topic, I used to subscribe to the same easy notions that you’re regurgitating as if it really was all as simple as, “this is who they are.”
You should spend some time trying to recognize the fallacies and projections in your response, and then deconstruct the thought patters which caused you to make them.
Are we to believe it's sinful for a man and woman to be dating (and maybe later getting married) if one of them just so happens to have more melanin in their skin than the other one?
You see how he phrases it? "We should not highlight the differences between racial groups, because racism".
How do you put quotations around something I never said? Weird.
He points only to skin color and doesn't point to DNA.
Where did I point to skin color? I pointed to international schemes to subvert western values.
Can you explain why 13% of the population commits 52% of all violent crime? Let's hear it. They didn't have a choice because of systemic racism, right?
Did I ever excuse this? I said, "People who share your perception have a tendency to recognize subversive conditions only when they target your collective identity, but in that same perception do not extend or afford those same grievances to another group."
The easiest way to disprove your implication is to simply compare current crime stats to pre 1960s crime stats. What does that suggest to you? What do you think dramatically changed?
You proved my point by not being able to answer your own question. Look up stats by race in regards to homosexuality and transgenderism. The results shouldn't surprise you when you consider what I said.
I pulled all of these quotes, save the first, from Discrimination and Disparities by T. Sowell. If you decide to read it for yourself, you’ll find citations for every claim. You should follow up by researching the history of urban political machines such as Tammany Hall, and the Albany Regency. You should also read some George Fitzugh for deeper insights into the mind of an elite Democrat. Lastly, if you every become self-aware, there’s hope that you might notice that your rhetoric parallels that of a progressive; you agree with their basic premise, you just propose different solutions.
Detroit is perhaps the most striking example of a once thriving city ruined by years of liberal social policies. Before the ghetto riot of 1967, Detroit's black population had the highest rate of home-ownership of any black urban population in the country, and their unemployment rate was just 3.4 percent.
In nineteenth-century Detroit, blacks had been denied the right to vote in 1850, but they were voting in the 1880s, and in the 1890s blacks were being elected to statewide offices in Michigan by a predominantly white electorate.
The 1880 census showed that, in Detroit, it was not uncommon for blacks and whites to live next door to each other. The black upper class had regular social interactions with upper-class whites, and their children attended high schools and colleges with the children of their white counterparts.
Despite all the voluminous writings making an intellectual or moral case for a confiscation of income and wealth, in the name of “social justice,” there has been remarkably little attention paid to the question of the extent to which this can actually be done in any comprehensive, long-run sense. In the short run, confiscation can easily be done, whether by governments or by mobs looting stores. Detroit has been a classic example of both—and of the long-run consequences. Nevertheless, killing the goose that lays the golden egg is a viable strategy form a purely political standpoint, provided the goose does not die before the next election.
A two-decades-long career for one man as mayor of Detroit, from 1974 to 1994, was made possible by policies which drove the most economically productive people out of Detroit, ensuring the mayor’s consecutive reelections by the departure of those people most likely to vote against him. It also ensured the decline of Detroit
Nor was Detroit unique. Such a combination of political success, along with economic and social disaster, can be found in a number of American cities where one political party has stayed in power for decades through redistributionist policies which drove out people who had much human capital, and left the city a hollow shell of its former self, after those tax-paying and job-creating people were gone. Third World nations that have had major confiscations of tangible wealth—whether the capital of foreign investors (“nationalization” of industries) or domestic entrepreneurs—have often suffered a similar fate for similar reasons.
Your post would look funny as a word bubble floating up from a white dude on the ground getting his face beaten in by four black dudes in Detroit.
You claim we are naive but your position still believes that race is based on skin color. That is not it. Race is genetic and cultural. We just refer to skin color as a shorthand for children but when you grow up, you are supposed to learn that skin color was just a metaphor (visual representation) for something much more subtle. Have you not ever noticed that when a black dude puts on whiteface he still doesn’t look white and when a white dude puts on blackface he still doesn’t look black? That proves race isn’t skin color. If it was skin color, then changing skin color would change the race.
And this isn’t even to say that divide and conquer isn’t being used against races to pit them against each other when our common bonds (family) are actually much stronger. That is all true. But none of that discredits the reality of racial differences as shown by demographic statistics. It’s just true. The differences are why they are even able to pit us against each other in the first place.
I’m speaking of the bogeyman which CRT insists on. That bogeyman is manifested for their purposes through hates hoaxes such as Charlottesville, as well as through 1488 propaganda spread online for cringey edgelords to parrot on social media. People who fall for it are serving as conduits for their narrative. Why is that hard to understand?
You answered the question in your next sentence. Why does the media go full court press on white supremacy? Good on you that you're not convinced, but let's not pretend that these boards aren't crawling with race baiters who prove their bogeyman exists. That's all the feds need to justify their overreach and violation of basic liberties.
The appropriate audience is Congress. That's how America works, and that's where the focus should be because that's where all the laws which have eroded our Republic originate.
If a white person states anything true, there is a certain crowd who claims that is “white supremacy”. Then conservo-cucks come in and plead with us to stop. “Just pleassse, stop saying that truth. And that one. And that one. Don’t you know these truths are making us loooooooooook bad.”
How about no? How about everyone just speaks the truth and if some pussy gets offended, let them stew.
Racial and geographical differences are often highlighted to divide us. If we're too busy squabbling with each other, how are we going to focus on the real problems? Idgaf if you're white, brown, yellow, or red, if you're against the Deep State and the exploitation of children, we're likely on the same team.
It's one thing to point out demographics for identification/clarification, but when they start using race as a justification/explanation for things, it's likely a glowie or someone stirring up trouble. They fear us all working together.
An old tactic from the playbook.
I find that just repeating, a mantra of whose interests are best served if the rest of us are at each other's throats is a good way to at least get people to stop and think.
Do you agree that this is a deliberate chess move against you?
Now ask yourself, are you playing against the pieces, or are you playing the hand that moves the pieces? You're busy worrying about the color of the pawns, when the hand moving them doesn't give two shits.
Or we trap/distract/sandbox/nullify the pawn and continue to go for the DS player's throat (...this isn't a normal game of chess). If the pawn wakes up at some time, becoming a queen/player for our side, then awesome! If not, then they can stay in the trapped/distracted/sandboxed/nullified condition we put on them until whenever.
The whole demoncrap game plan (and the DS) is to divide and conquer. Separate us into different offended groups. It can be social, religious, monetary, race, or any other. I refuse to play their game.
Did you ever think if the era of National Sovereignty was a good time for the world?
The NWO is forcing Babylon on the world and unless it's stopped AT THE BORDERS and Western Culture is restored, we are doomed.
I don’t give a fig for special identity groups, and stop trying to make me give a fig. SHUN ICKY
Cui bono - we the people, or the puppet masters?
People don't naturally integrate. Black people don't like acting white, white people don't get into acting black.
All government insistence that you ''integrate'' actually means ''GET RID OF YOUR WHITENESS and your CHRISTIANITY and HAVING any STANDARDS for BEHAVIOR at ALL.
People sort themselves out, and I agree with you on the second portion as well, but do you ever wonder why they go through all the effort? It has nothing to do with race. As long as you keep falling for this sleight of hand, your anger will be directed in the wrong direction.
I just saw your stupid ass write ''should have went'' in a string of words you thought were a sentence in another post you made.
You need to shut the fuck up about what others here think until you can figure out a question mark goes at the end of ''Could you tell if you were triggered.''
You're another illiterate from the public school system trying to pretend you had an original, and deep thought, once.
Have you ever seen that meme of crying Wojak hiding his face under a mask of Smug wojak?
Go back and fix the illiteracy your fractured writing proves and try to sound deep when you get that straightened out, idiot.
upvote for tenacity
First letters of sentences are capitalized, and they're ended with periods in the English language.
Purfessar.
You’re full of words but not much else.
or maybe White people are sick of being called racist and having our entire country overrun with illegal immigrants and favored status given to minority racial groups, excluding our merit based reward system.
Knowing it's all a psyop doesn't help much.
Walk into south Detroit and tell the blacks your thoughts. See how it goes.
You missed the point. Let’s contemplate your response.
What does South Detroit have to do with the machinations of an international political scheme to undermine western culture? You need to understand that the resentment which you just expressed is already accounted for, especially by those who craft these dubious narratives. Instead of directing your energy and focus upon changing the long established and well fortified machine which created, perpetuated, and actively reinforces the conditions which haunt South Detroit, you instead chose to pay mind to the lowly miserable demons who exist only as a product of the machine.
People who share your perception have a tendency to recognize subversive conditions only when they target your collective identity, but in that same perception do not extend or afford those same grievances to another group.
You should be talking to Blacks, not Whites.
You also sound like a pretentious douchebag, speaking in platitudes. Just what are the 'conditions which HAUNT South Detriot'?:
Damn if that doesn't sound Obama or Harris! Spoiler Alert >> IT'S SYSTEMIC RACISM << LMFAO!
Again, go to South Detroit and speak to them this way. You'll get your neo-intellectual ass kicked in. Here, I'll just label you an obnoxious phony.
South Detroit is the reflection of Black urban culture, buddy. Just like Crenshaw, Carson and Compton. This is who they are. Blacks who had the work ethic and good sense to escape the imagined prisons of Black urban centers know exactly what I'm talking about.
My only collective identity is I'm an American.
Are we to assume then, that those black South Detroiters are in the 4-6%-lost-forever group?
It’s really sad that you couldn’t refrain from spiraling.
Along with your childlike susceptibility to propaganda, all you’ve managed to prove is your shallow understanding of any relevant topic related to this subject. Before I educated myself on the topic, I used to subscribe to the same easy notions that you’re regurgitating as if it really was all as simple as, “this is who they are.”
You should spend some time trying to recognize the fallacies and projections in your response, and then deconstruct the thought patters which caused you to make them.
Or you can just keep insulting me.
Would you be able to tell if you were triggered.
Yeah I didn't go to a government school like your stupid ass. Therefore I don't act like I have an 8th grade education the way you do.
Really YOU seem triggered by white Christians not kneeling to your race mixing scam.
You really come across as a supremist Jew.
Are we to believe it's sinful for a man and woman to be dating (and maybe later getting married) if one of them just so happens to have more melanin in their skin than the other one?
Your hysterical spiral is proving my point. Great job. Derail harder.
YOU'RE SAYING NOTHING
LOL
Read this drivel, pedes. Just another condescending, psuedo-intellectual faggot pretending to know how to fix Black culture.
tell us Einstein, what are the MECHANISMS THAT HAUNT SOUTH DETRIOT
What are OP's thoughts on broken nuclear families?
I know. That is why I am directly engaging this fake fuck.
Don't expect an answer. He doesn't have any.
How do you put quotations around something I never said? Weird.
Where did I point to skin color? I pointed to international schemes to subvert western values.
Did I ever excuse this? I said, "People who share your perception have a tendency to recognize subversive conditions only when they target your collective identity, but in that same perception do not extend or afford those same grievances to another group."
The easiest way to disprove your implication is to simply compare current crime stats to pre 1960s crime stats. What does that suggest to you? What do you think dramatically changed?
You proved my point by not being able to answer your own question. Look up stats by race in regards to homosexuality and transgenderism. The results shouldn't surprise you when you consider what I said.
I pulled all of these quotes, save the first, from Discrimination and Disparities by T. Sowell. If you decide to read it for yourself, you’ll find citations for every claim. You should follow up by researching the history of urban political machines such as Tammany Hall, and the Albany Regency. You should also read some George Fitzugh for deeper insights into the mind of an elite Democrat. Lastly, if you every become self-aware, there’s hope that you might notice that your rhetoric parallels that of a progressive; you agree with their basic premise, you just propose different solutions.
here ya go, you fucking faggot
Your post would look funny as a word bubble floating up from a white dude on the ground getting his face beaten in by four black dudes in Detroit.
You claim we are naive but your position still believes that race is based on skin color. That is not it. Race is genetic and cultural. We just refer to skin color as a shorthand for children but when you grow up, you are supposed to learn that skin color was just a metaphor (visual representation) for something much more subtle. Have you not ever noticed that when a black dude puts on whiteface he still doesn’t look white and when a white dude puts on blackface he still doesn’t look black? That proves race isn’t skin color. If it was skin color, then changing skin color would change the race.
And this isn’t even to say that divide and conquer isn’t being used against races to pit them against each other when our common bonds (family) are actually much stronger. That is all true. But none of that discredits the reality of racial differences as shown by demographic statistics. It’s just true. The differences are why they are even able to pit us against each other in the first place.
White people must stop hoarding all the magic dirt.
No.
I’m speaking of the bogeyman which CRT insists on. That bogeyman is manifested for their purposes through hates hoaxes such as Charlottesville, as well as through 1488 propaganda spread online for cringey edgelords to parrot on social media. People who fall for it are serving as conduits for their narrative. Why is that hard to understand?
You answered the question in your next sentence. Why does the media go full court press on white supremacy? Good on you that you're not convinced, but let's not pretend that these boards aren't crawling with race baiters who prove their bogeyman exists. That's all the feds need to justify their overreach and violation of basic liberties.
The appropriate audience is Congress. That's how America works, and that's where the focus should be because that's where all the laws which have eroded our Republic originate.
If a white person states anything true, there is a certain crowd who claims that is “white supremacy”. Then conservo-cucks come in and plead with us to stop. “Just pleassse, stop saying that truth. And that one. And that one. Don’t you know these truths are making us loooooooooook bad.”
How about no? How about everyone just speaks the truth and if some pussy gets offended, let them stew.