New CCTV Footage Shows The Moment The Champlain Towers Collapsed In Surfside, Florida- There Is Speculation That McAfee's Files Were In That Building
(www.usasupreme.com)
McAfee connection is rumor
I'm thinking about Directed Energy Weapons from space. Tuned to melt steel. The first pass hit the center of the building. Then it was used to take out one of the side pieces. Perhaps the other side was too close to another building to safely use it without taking some of the neighbor building also. Because there would be no way to explain that.
That was my first thought as well. Also we had the cross bridge in DC fall yesterday as well.
Pedestrian bridge on Baltimore collapse too above Rt295
Using space laser to AstroTurf some support for the “infrastructure” pork bill
It is very likely not a DEW from space, if you have a satellite in space, the lowest orbit ones are 160km from Earth. Even if you focused that frequency, which would affect steel, which would likely be it's resonant frequency which is under 1Mhz would have a large wave length. The larger that wave length is the larger the focused array has to be. A 1Mhz frequency alone is 300m, they don't have satellites that big.
Also, for a building to be targeted with just it's steel remotely like that you'd need to take in effect the entire building and it's materials, as other materials would inhibit the resonance of just the steel. Higher density > lower frequency, higher stiffness > higher frequency.
Also with frequency there is a steep drop off of power over distance. Although low in frequency it can travel far, the power behind that frequency would not be very strong, you'd need a monumentally large power source, and dish in order to focus a directed energy weapon to take out a building like that, high tech or not it's bound by physics. You don't need a strong signal to receive with a receiver, but in order to have a transferrence of energy, well, even if the signal drops 10dB that's 10x less power. How much power do you need to obliterate a building? no idea, I assume it's a lot. I say obliterate because in that video if that's low frequency energy weapon then that's straight up a weapon of mass destruction, they'd do more with that if they had that.
DEWs are cool in theory but mostly science fiction if you're thinking satellites. I can see some applications that they have an effect but not strong enough to destroy a building that focused from 160km away, with a frequency with a wavelength of 300m. The parabolic reflector must be larger than the wavelength, so 300m+ dish in space might a bit of a problem being discrete.
Likely if this was an energy weapon of sorts, if you choose to believe so, it's much closer than you'd think. also you'd have to take into account that when we do see steel start to lose it's integrity it isn't nearly instantaneous like what we see here. If it was then holy hell, mega death satellite in space kinda means ultimate power to anyone on the surface.
Not trying to be a downer, but although it's not directed related to my field, I'm an electrical engineer who works in the cellular field, I mostly did a ton of google fu to reiterate the concepts that I am not very versed in, but it's easy to say it's a bit more science fiction than reality. DEWs exist, but their power, strength, range, scope, are all more limited than you'd imagine.
TLDR; I nerded out on some science stuff, likelihood of DEWs from space are almost 0 to be the culprit, frequency isn't magical it makes a lot of sense, just gotta wrap your brain around some universal concepts and apply it to a new medium.
I'm a physicist with a masters. I confess that I haven't analyzed DEWs.
But I don't think you need to be when you look at images like this.
https://files.catbox.moe/j5s0k5.jpg
or this
https://files.catbox.moe/qugema.jpg
or this
https://files.catbox.moe/9ciybd.jpg
I don't buy it that there are forest fires.
Yea I didn't really analyze DEWs all too much besides what I believe to be the theory behind them, which is a beam from space.
I'm just asserting It's likely not a satellite. Energy weapons exist, and in fact are really fun to theorize, but to get something to work from space to hone in on a signal to take out a building is just very unlikely.
That being said, I would say that starting a fire is definitely feasible, Higher frequencies can be honed into a tighter beam, making the energy and focal point very direct. Would that take out a building with what seems to be raw force? No. Do I think they could burn it? Oh for sure, but there are many counter measures to that so it's probably why it isn't super practical to always use.
Now I do think the idea of a fire causing some of those can be done, maybe not likely but that doesn't always mean it didn't. Also, hate to say it, but pictures aren't enough evidence to conclude alone that "it must have been the DEWs!"
I was pretty skeptical of the whole fire scenario when that stuff was going down, definitely foul play imo. Just doesn't have to be DEWs.
I'm in no way a resident expert with them though, but I feel as though there would be some very specific signs to investigate. Like, if it was a beam how does it operate? How does it burn exactly? Is it the focal point of frequency? What kind? Is it even EMF? or is it something else? If it's EMF then the specific frequencies would affect some materials but not others possibly. Idk, I just kinda doubt it, if you had a fire starting laser what would you do with it?
But in no way did it take out a building, it just seems too far fetched, the fires I give it a plausible since i haven't looked more into myself. Not trying to be all skeptical Sam, but I'm just trying to direct things in a more productive way, ya know? I don't think it's harmful to reshape other possibilities. Personally, I just think it was something like thermite or something to simultaneously burn thru the supports. Also to choose to make the building collapse vs just burning it where you know what your target is seems like a very valid way to not guarantee destruction of what your target was. Fire would likely be a better way.
We can agree that space-based lasers are not present. But, for your information, the destructive effect against steel (or any other metal) is purely through the application of heat. It has nothing to do with "higher frequencies."
First picture reminds me of tornado scenes where one home can be more-or-less unaffected while next-door neighbor’s home has been completely demolished. It doesn’t make as much sense with fires.
Not following the second picture there. SUV with what? Burn mark of some sort? Transporting fire starter of some sort? Then last pic is not the SUV. Not sure the implication here. Can you elucidate?
That third picture is bizarre.
Lol no. I got the images in 2017. Long before BLM
No not a dent.
The point is that the trailer is burned. The tree with the green leaves is fine. The plastic trash bin is only slightly melted.
But yeah Mr. Joined 10 days ago with no posts.
Fuck off. There is nothing you can do to stop any of this.
What's worse is they covered up what I believe to be over 8k deaths.
Can’t get any of your links to work
Why?
You might as well think about unicorns. They would be more likely. No DEWs in space. Technology is too cumbersome. We looked into it in the 1980s Strategic Defense Initiative. No hotspot. Stop obsessing over fantasy weapons.
Bullshit.
DEWs don't have be in space. They could be in aircraft or perhaps landbased.
The HAARP facility is exactly a DEW, in that it uses a phased array to send a tight beam of energy in an arbitrary direction. The official justification is to do atmospheric research. They can apply vast amounts of energy to heat the atmosphere. But they are all over the world in different forms.
Secret satellites are launched all the time. Because they are secret we have no idea what they are doing. What you are doing is gaslighting by being dismissive and derisive.
Sorry, we don't have them running around like candy bars. They are useless through clouds or smoke. No evidence for them. Easier to invoke pixies.
HAARP is just a research tool for ionospheric study.
Classifed satellites are launched all the time, but the fact they are being launched is quite publicly visible. Since you have no idea what they are doing, you are in what is called a STATE OF IGNORANCE. And that's as it should be, for classified systems and activities. (Been there, done that.)
I am only disabusing the more ridiculous fantasies. If you ever contemplated how little you know about these matters, you would be less bold about making wild claims.
No planes hit any buildings on 911