I don't make this post to paint myself as a victim. I would however like to maybe make a point about new comers to this site, which this site may have many more new guests once Q becomes more mainstream.
I understand many of you here have followed this for years and know the whole story. Please don't forget how it can be difficult for new people waking up and finding themselves stumbling in the dark to find their way through the mass amount of info on this subject.
I understand due to the subject matter coms needed to be coded and not all could be said or easy to find. But coming to this site and getting the feeling that many here just want to fight and insult people or call them out as a troll or glowie instantly when they don't know as much as them is disconcerting.
I know it can feel frustrating dealing with people that get things wrong or havent spent the time you have getting to know the facts, I would ask to just keep in the back of your mind to try and be kind and welcoming to anyone on this site.
I treat handshake pretty fairly, compared to others.
It's best to just ignore handshakes completely. If they say something stupid, send them a Q post and end it there.
If they make claims that are completely contrary to confirmed Q posts, then those are fightin' words. We can't have people twisting Q posts and others running with it.
One I'm still miffed with is when I see "10 days of darkness."
Q never said this. Q always separated those lines thusly:
10 days.
Darkness.
Which could, in that context, indicated 10 days of "something" happening FOLLOWED by an indefinite period of darkness.
Darnkess, the typo version was also used. Q did not correct, which means it was intentional. Many think it refers to the DPRK, but there are numerous interpretations. Some also think darnkess is simply defined as an "unsettling disturbing pain."
I have to hold my tongue and shake my head whenever someone says "10 days of darkness."
That's just one example. I hope you can see why handshakes not doing their due diligence can poison something Q said.
"It's best to just ignore handshakes completely. If they say something stupid, send them a Q post and end it there."
"You dont even need to engage handshakes. You can just scroll on by."
" just say 'actually, it says this', and point them to the Q post."
Yeah... I don't see where we disagree.
see, i hate these deleted posts. cannot see the context, sure they are probably wrong in what they are posting, but it makes the replies to them harder to understand. what is wrong with editing in an apology or admitting it is wrong? to me, deleted posts aree weak. plus we as users do not see who posted the deleted posts, so we are less aware of who we are conversing with on this forum. and this is more of an ingeneral replay than directed at sleepydude.
Active imaginations.
It means no such thing. That was made up.
Just as when Trump typed "bad press covfefe", he didn't mean to type "bad press coffee", but rather "bad press coverage".