Has anyone asked Gen Flynn, Mike Lindell, Lin Wood, etc., why Trump is saying the vaccines are safe when 99% of the Q community thinks it's poison?
Another repost about 5D chess
I would like to see some discussion on this. I can't stop thinking about this discrepancy. It makes no sense to me. Has anyone asked the people we think are closely related to Q why President Trump is saying that the vaccines are safe when we have plenty of data to show otherwise?
A benevolent leader advocates for the weak and protects them when able. That includes the weak in body, mind and spirit. The moment Trump nknew ow dangerous the vaccines were and kept endorsing them, he became one of the bad guys to me. If in hindsight I learn that the VAERS data was all fake anda part of the movie just as the COVID data was all faked, I will happily change my position.
I want to first start by pointing out an uncomfortable truth -
Trump is no longer President of the US at the moment and therefore not a benevolent leader at this time. That job currently falls on the fraudulent President in Biden.
Secondly, Trump is NOT a medical professional. Truth is, he shouldn't be giving his advice at all (as it should be). Instead, he has pointed out alternatives to people to let them, either on their own or in consultation with your doctor, make an informed decision.
Why is it Trump that should be telling anyone what they should do medically and not one's own doctor? Shouldn't the course of action someone takes normally is to discuss the vaccine with your doctor first? Shouldn't it be your doctor, as a sworn medical professional, that is educating you on the dangers of the dangers of the vaccine?
I know people get angry that some actions may cost some lives. But what is the alternative they may be fighting to prevent. Under the 16 year plan that would have culminated under Hillary, they were planning to kill almost 2/3 of the US population.
People need to understand this is not a law enforcement action going on, this is an outright war against an enemy that has been embedding themselves into the US infrastructure since 1913. An enemy that has no problem assassinating Presidents (Kennedy) or starting major wars (WWI & WWII) to keep their control on power.
Do you understand what Trump and the Q team are truly up against? Do you understand that they are trying to take the best course of action that leads to the least amount of casualties, but also understand the reality that in war you will never avoid casualties altogether?
Yes, it sucks that he can't come right out and tell people everything. It sucks that he has to play the game of deception, even against good people. But, in the end, they are trying to win a war that has been on-going for a little over one hundred years now. Unfortunately, there are going to be causalities. There is no way to avoid it. The best they can do is try to minimize it.
You're thinking too simple. It's so much more than just covid. Were talking about the complete dismantling of the deep state. Instead of counting deaths, which were going to happen regardless of what trump did, I like to think he mitigated as many losses as possible while still keeping the main operation going. Covid is just a small portion of the entire operation. There are much much bigger, and more dangerous fish to fry. If you don't cut off the head of the snake this will just keep repeating itself in different forms and we will end up far worse off. The end isn't for everybody.
You "like to think." "The end isn't for everybody." What you like to think about is your opinion, unless you're backing it up with data measurable by objective reality. Your Q quote could just as well mean "us as it could mean any other thing. What if the end isn't for us because our passivity causes us to not be here? I'm not proposing a thing. I'm just pointing out the problem as I see it with making interpretations and assumptions that support your world view is that the assumptions you're making could be entirely false.
That's perfectly fine and a great many people are giving Trump a pass on this vax stuff based on their beliefs and thoughts about the big picture situation and the many other things they like about Trump. Personally, I prefer not to make assumptions based on what I would like to believe. I am just looking at things as they are now. This vaccine is more deadly and injurious than any vaccine product we have seen in the last 30 years COMBINED unless the VAERS data is compromised.
I admit openly that there is more that I don't know than that I do. I would like to know more and am open to learning new information as it becomes available to me. In the meantime, I'm not giving anyone a pass, including Donald Trump, for what appears at this moment to be deliberate wrongdoing. When I am shown based on evidence and facts, not convinced based on someone's theory or personal belief, that there was justifiable reason for any actions he took I will happily reverse position. I will not swear unconditional allegiance to anyone, ever.
I am not trying to pick a fight here. Just expressing why I am not in agreement with your position at this time. You are free to continue holding your viewpoint and I will be continuing to search.
And your opinion is yours. Good luck in your search.
There were two choices:
This is a war. In a war their are no ideal solutions.