Win / GreatAwakening
GreatAwakening
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
GreatAwakening Where We Go Qne, We Go All!
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

78
“VIC’S JOKE”?‍??‍??‍? Used to be a secret but The cats out of the bag !!! (media.greatawakening.win)
posted 5 years ago by Oldpatriot 5 years ago by Oldpatriot +78 / -0
24 comments download share
24 comments share download save hide report block hide replies
Comments (24)
sorted by:
▲ 5 ▼
– DonjuantheDon 5 points 5 years ago +5 / -0

Victoria's Secret (Penis)

permalink save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– CrQCQd1LE_TendiePede 4 points 5 years ago +4 / -0

Top row: 5 x 10's.

Bottom row: 2 x choccy ham planets, 2 x vanilla 6's (Being generous here..) an Asian dood with a 2 inch punisher and WHAT THE F#CK IS WITH THE 12YO RANGA BOY!!!???

Shift Ctrl Escape.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– Stumpycake 4 points 5 years ago +4 / -0

Top: "These runway models set an unrealistic standard for women's body image or some stupid shit. Normal women don't look like that!"

Bottom: "An 11 year old boy! Perfect!"

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– caplock 4 points 5 years ago +4 / -0

Dude...............that is hilarious!!

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– Stumpycake 3 points 5 years ago +3 / -0

Well #3's pretty cute and #5 ain't bad. But as a whole it's all bullshit.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– Qanaut 4 points 5 years ago +4 / -0

Its okay. You can admit it. You've got the hots for #4.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– Stumpycake 5 points 5 years ago +5 / -0

I'd take #4 over Zuckerfuck's clone from outer space over there.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– prometheus_xiii 3 points 5 years ago +3 / -0

I'm pretty sure #6 IS zuckerbergs clone.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Qanaut 2 points 5 years ago +2 / -0

Touché

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 5 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 2 ▼
– young_roshi 2 points 5 years ago +2 / -0

#3 is pretty cute in VERY relative terms.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– Matthew246Truth 3 points 5 years ago +3 / -0

EEWWWWW

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– Oldpatriot [S] 3 points 5 years ago +3 / -0

There used to be a call to excellence in all things.. it encouraged us to up our game and strive.. now it’s “accept me for who I am no matter what I do or don’t do or you are a hater”…. They elevate the folks that don’t try to improve, and we are seeing the horrible affects of it!!!

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– sleepydude 3 points 5 years ago +3 / -0

Not gonna lie, I don't find any of them attractive, top or bottom. Especially bottom.

Glamour just doesn't do it for me. I know you didn't ask but, this is how I break attractiveness -- in a 3 point triangle:

Glamour ______________ Sweet/Cute

         |       /

         |    / 

         | /

     Grace

Grace and Sweetness/Cuteness is far more attractive to me than glamour, as seen in the top 5 models above.

The bottom models basically have none of the above in any redeeming capacity. They all decided to emphasize their weaknesses, which is just sad.

  • Glamour is a focused act of appearance over ability. Everything is about looks and presentation rather than the follow-through. This is why many who emphasize their natural glamour are often very, very shallow in thought, which is what a lot of men find ideal because of the low-maintenance emotional factor. Glamour is the dolled up, synthetic appearance that average women refer to harshly as "sluttiness" but is simply a careful over-emphasis on the female's natural curves, contrast and shadows by use of makeup or trick lighting through pose and posture. Shadows and curves are made by wrinkles and folds. When you age, those are the first to go droopy. That's why most white and some Latina women, while attractive in youth, age like milk. On top of that, glamour typically has a self-importance and trophy worldview that permeates the mind of both the man and woman. I find it odd that it goes hand in hand with the least age-stable form of attraction.

  • Grace as attractiveness is found in ballerinas, dancers, and geshia-like appearances. I see grace attributed to dexterity, skill, and craft. Even more distilled, it is how the woman handles her body and movements, even of expression, to seem reserved at all times. This reservation is the "play hard to get" many women get completely wrong. Grace is a learned thing; you aren't born with it. Dedication to acting very precise and certain is attractive in and of itself. It shows character and an otherworldly timelessness that tickles the man's sense of muse worship.

  • Cuteness/Sweetness doesn't require youth, as you might immediately assume. Innocence can exist outside of youth. To have a plucky up-beat attitude at all times and staying high energy is all that is required to be attractive in this aspect. This is what pedos might actually find attractive (before they build upon it with the thrill of taboo and perversion), but they don't realize it isn't the age that they want it is the attentiveness of curiosity and innocence they are drawn to. There is a great deal of attraction in having a woman authentically curious in everything you do. The innocent, excessively emotive, and curiosity combo stimulates the man's want/need to be a protector. A protector not only needs someone to protect, but a task that the two must accomplish that requires protection. In this way, the man is attracted not only to the woman but the challenge. Some can call it a type of wanderlust.

If you want to break it down even more simply:

Glamour = Primal demand for sex.

Grace = Otherworldly muse worship.

Cute/Sweet = Engages man's need to protect and explore.


If you want examples of this trichotomy in practice:

Consider the myth that Asians don't seem to age. In truth, it hinges on the perception of grace and cuteness. Few Asians need make-up to look attractive, because very few have the glamour factor. They have grace and cuteness/sweetness in spades, however. Cultural factors have a bigger part to play in how reserved and curious they tend to be, and that is probably a conditional result of their genetic lack of glamour.

Likewise, the above 5 Angels have both glamour and grace, with little cuteness/sweetness. None of them seem in much need of protection, but they definitely promote the primal sex drive and their trained movement and height entice muse worship.

Finally, you have a cuteness/sweet and glamour combo. This is exceedingly rare in this day and age, at least in popular media. It is hard to find an example. The best I can do is point towards the pig-tailed country girl who likes animals and nature but still finds time to cut her jeans off at just the right height to keep a man staring for more and shading her eyes so they pop out from under the cowboy hat.

Anyway, thanks if you made it this far. I hope you found it interesting to think about, even if you disagree.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Oldpatriot [S] 2 points 5 years ago +2 / -0

Totally agree.. as a teenager even.. always found myself being attracted to the kind spirited girls.. very much a turnoff if their looks were their identity!!

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– sleepydude 2 points 5 years ago +2 / -0

Another word for Cuteness/Sweetness is "kawaii."

There is not an appropriate English word for it, in my opinion.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– caplock 3 points 5 years ago +3 / -0

I swear these are the same people that work at my DMV here in California.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– JFKsBoatBell 3 points 5 years ago +3 / -0

Victor's Secrets

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– SemperSupra 3 points 5 years ago +3 / -0

It's because Victoria Secret was just a way to recruit for Epstein island. The whole point of it and Playboy was to find young, beautiful girls. Some were chosen for "star", but a lot that didn't make the cut got used in other ways.

Personally, I think Victoria Secret is being punished for its past crimes and it's being made to humiliate itself.

I saw an article the other day about how the Freemasons in London have gone woke and now must be an inclusive secret society.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/0/millennials-vegans-welcome-have-freemasons-gone-woke/

I can't wait for Skull and Bones new inclusive policies.

It's important in a highly exclusive hush-hush secret society bent on world domination to make sure you're inclusive.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– ArmyLady 3 points 5 years ago +3 / -0

Never spent a dime there. Did not appreciate the mostly nude depictions facing the mall where kids walk buy to get to toy stores and real clothing and shoe stores. Toddlers don't need to be exposed to that but VS did it anyway.

One reason I stopped going to malls altogether.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– sleepydude 3 points 5 years ago +3 / -0

Whelp...

You know what this means.

Hundreds of newly fired Angels are now starting up an Only Fans account.

This will probably cause some conflict in the simp market.


Jokes aside, what is with the medieval monk hair-cut on the prepubescent ginger lad on the right?

Even for a psychologically disturbed trans model that has been disingenuously told they have "it" to push an agenda, that is unbelievably horrific and unforgivable.

No one but a joke Dark Souls character should have that haircut.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– naahbruh 4 points 5 years ago +4 / -0

I believe it's called a Eunuch

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– SBDAmerican 2 points 5 years ago +2 / -0

#3 winner for sure, assuming that strategically placed top is not covering an appendage that should not be there.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Recyclops 1 point 5 years ago +1 / -0

VS Angels are being replaced with VS Collective. Doesn't sound too Marxist/Communist. One member of the Collective is Eileen Gu, an American born 17 year old skier that competes for China. Her father is American, mother Chinese. Playboy recently bought an Australian lingerie company and will probably replace VS in the lingerie market.

permalink save report block reply

Welcome


The Great Awakening


We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.


WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q


Welcome to the Digital Battlefield — Together We Win

Rules


Q Supporters

This is The Great Awakening. Our community is international, focused on helping ourselves and others walk away from the programming, and return our governments to "by the people, for the people!"



Follow the Law

No posts or comments that violate laws in your jurisdiction or the United States. The Feds are always watching!



No Bad Behavior!

No doxing, including revealing personal information of non-public figures, as well as addresses, phone numbers, etc. of public figures. All GAW users must adhere to the highest standards of conduct, whichever .WIN they are on. If we are notified by other moderators of incivil behavior on other .WINs, you WILL be banned here!



Civil Discussion ONLY**

They want you divided.

They want you labeled by race, religion, class, sex, etc.

Divided you are weak [no collective power].

Divided you attack each other and miss the true target [them].



No PAYtriots/No Self Promotion

Linking or promoting merchandise, fundraising, or spamming personal websites, blogs, or channels is not permitted. Do not attempt to profit from Q or advertise for those who do. Peace is the prize. We do it for free.



Questions and Concerns

All moderation questions and concerns should be submitted via modmail. DO NOT GRIEF the mods.



Expand your thinking

Remember, this .WIN is the public face of the Great Awakening, and, as a member here, you agree to represent the Great Awakening movement against Globalism, Communism and Progressive Insanity in the best, most positive way possible. NOTE: Your comments and posts may become news. Keep it classy!

This is not a 'fringe conspiracy' site: Visit https://conspiracies.win if that's your thing!



No doomers or shills

If you can't use common sense, you'll get banned without hesitation. If you're a shill, you fall under this rule. If you're a doomer, you fall under this rule as you just add garbage to the site like the other two. This includes forum sliding.



General Rules

  • Mods will issue NO warnings, followed by temporary bans and/or permanent bans. DO NOT GRIEF THE MODS.

  • Keep posts related to topics Q has raised or that are current.

  • Keep post duplication (especially from other .WINs) to a minimum.

  • HIGH EFFORT, HIGH-INFO posts only! Please respect other readers' time. Please use descriptive titles. No URLs in titles, pls. No clickbait.

  • No fame-fagging; no, "your" post did not get removed! Were you the original author?? Eyes on the prize, people!

  • Memes encouraged, but no low-quality, low-info posts.

  • Keep it honest and accurate.

  • GAW Supporters ONLY. (Sorry, the train had no brakes.)

  • Handshake noobs will be scrutinized by their Q knowledge, sincerity, and respect.

  • Remember, your conduct here represents the Q movement! OUR ENEMIES ARE WATCHING!

  • Please direct all complaints to modmail first!


Resources


WELCOME TO THE DIGITAL BATTLEFIELD


"River of Search" script:


GAW post formatting tips


Q Research (Q only posts at 8kun)


Q post archives (qagg.news) others 1 2 3 4


Browse Drops from the beginning


QProofs.com


Learn to read the Q map


Book of Q Proofs v1.3 (pdf)


Law of War & Majic Eyes Qnly Resources


Trumps twitter archive


POTUS: The Calm Before The Storm


Pedosta and DNC dumps


GIFs & QPosts


Poll Post Format


SPY ON US! See: mod Logs


The Greatest Show on Earth!


New to Q? "The Earth Chronicles Ep 12: Q & The White-Hat Op: What's Real, What's Not?"


Moderators

  • dropgun
  • catsfive
  • AutoMod
  • Filter
  • Fatality
  • Qanaut
  • bubble_bursts
  • Brent75
  • and 8 more...
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - w2qgj (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy