? 82% of pregnant women who took mRNA vaccine had miscarriage ?
(www.lifesitenews.com)
?️ STAT DEBATABLE LOL ?
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (148)
sorted by:
Aaaaanddd the article is fake and gay.
Allow me to disseminate, and do this weird thing that for whatever inexplicable reason very few people here are capable of doing: Research.
And from it we readily conclude that LifeSiteNews either got contacted by a severe dyslectic who miraculously got an oncology degree or just made shit up. Probably the fucking later because if you actually carry out source control, you'll realize they don't actually give you names to refer to, nor make any reference to a wish to remain anonymous despite this being peer review.
The author, who committed an argument from authority fallacy using a made up individual, simply can't read statistics to save her fucking life and outright misrepresents the numbers and perverts the conclusion. So lets tear apart the central claim:
"the researchers had stated there were only 104 miscarriages among 827 pregnant women who had received a COVID vaccine, but reported only in a footnote that 700 of the pregnant women had received the shot after 28 weeks. Losing a baby after 20 weeks is not considered suffering a miscarriage but a still birth, she stated."
So, out of 827 pregnancies that finished, 104 had spontaneous abortions (medical slang for a miscarriage), 96 of which happened in the first trimester. This is actually clearly stated in the study. There is no degree of obfuscation going on and only a blind person could read past this. It clearly, unambiguously states that 90% of the premature abortions noted in the end results are in the first 13 weeks.
But you see, the reason why this is such a retarded statement, is that it isn't 104 miscarriages out of 827 pregnant women who got the vaccine.
its 104 out of 3958 pregnant women who got the vaccine. 827 is the partition of participants who GAVE BIRTH in the scope of the study; it lasting approximately a month from February 28th (the start period of when individuals were seen as viable for the sample) to March 30th; kinda speaks for itself that not everyone surveyed would give birth in the period of a month, don't it?
The true number of 13<w pregnant women vaccinates vs miscarried is actually 96 vs 1224
I'm sorry where did you get the 3,958 figure? Edit: I see the it's found within the study.
It says 104 of the 127 pregnant mothers given the vax before 20 weeks miscarried. 104/127=82%. The article argues that the other 700 mothers were given the vax after 20 weeks and so their data should be disregarded.
Out of the 104 abortions, 96 (92.3%) occurred before 13 weeks gestation.
Aaaaand retards are downvoting the person doing actual research. Way to go GA!
I don't know why people are down voting you. They just like to fall for fake news I guess.
This is why it was pulled. These papers are very cryptic, mainly because the study isn't complete since a lot of these women haven't given birth.