Still questioning if Elon Musk is a white hat?
(media.greatawakening.win)
Comments (27)
sorted by:
@Jack, MZ, ES, JB, EM, SH, MSM, etc.
Do you know that we know?
Do you know that we see all?
Do you know that we hear all?
FEAR the STORM.
NOBODY PLAYING THE GAME GETS A FREE PASS.
NOBODY.
Q
Jack Dorsey, Mark Zuckerberg, Eric Schmidt, Jeff Bezos, Elon Musk, Steve Huffman, Mainstream Media
Get over it. We’ve all lost heroes and mentors in this war. Yeah, it sucks and it’s hard. Anyone supports China is a fuqqin traitor Bro. This isn’t a game.
Let's just say Elon is a useful tool for Q.
Really, no, Elon is a useful tool for himself and himself only.
Did you notice there has been weeks and weeks since anything new on Elon and Q has been posted here? It was never his focus. Elon was just memeing.
But he sure is somebody's golden boy because there are no repercussions even after murdering a whole bunch of his adoring customers via the autopilot. And the NHTSA is still "investigating" a whole bunch of the accidents. Shirley a golden boy who can do no wrong.
Ban sex while driving.
Sometimes your spiffy new Tesla just wants to kill you, even when you are not horny enough to get it on while letting the car drive itself.
See ZH: https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/tesla-model-s-plaid-spotted-rolling-down-road-fire-exploding-suburban-philadelphia
Always, Tesla and Elon go scot-free each time something like this happens. Elon is chaotic neutral and I will not touch any of his products with a 10 foot pole.
Using the autopilot wrong and dying is not Elon Musk's fault. That's like blaming shootings on the gun manufacturers.
It's completely ETHICALLY UNTENABLE for all involved who WILLINGLY OVERSOLD AND WORKED ON THE FEATURE. Even after so many casualties.
No, it's not like gun technology. Guns are a mature tech, their workings are well-known and predictable.
Autopilot tech is far from ready. Even with say, one serious incident per million hours of running time, a lot of people will die. Running straight into a trailer truck painted white? Plowing into policemen on a roadside? Is it just, oh funny that, we will fix it in the next software patch?
Starting from Elon to those showroom salespeople.
Even websites that earn revenue with uncritical Tesla cheerleading.
And it's disappointing that the Tesla software devs feel fine letting customers play with BETA SOFTWARE THAT CAN KILL. As an old dinosaur, it's amazing that these software devs feel fine with such things. Did they not learn ethics?
If someone isn't watching the auto-pilot to take manual control if it's doing something wrong that's them using it incorrectly and is not the fault of the product or the creators of the product.
From everything I've seen, dying to Tesla auto-pilot is textbook Darwinism.
Retarded thinking trying to justify a defective and DEADLY feature.
The AI cannot evaluate high-level situations far ahead and make decisions to maximize safety or plan way in advance. Any driver would slow down, but the AI cannot do such high-level evaluations of scenarios. Artificial AIs are imperfect pattern matchers, focused on interpreting the road, not emergency situations. A few seconds to take control. Suppose the car is barreling into a deadly situation. A sure-fire way of killing customers or innocent people.
You see a person with a stopped car, perhaps suicidal or unstable. But he is not on the road. You slow down a bit, be on alert. Or even change lane if you're in a bad neighborhood. If he dashes onto the road, you can avoid him easily. The AI? Might just be cruising because the road is empty. It cannot evaluate the body language of the person. Then he dashes out into the path of your car. AI drops out, telling you to take over. The AI just handed you a fucked-up situation that it allowed to happen. Even emergency braking is a poor outcome, because the AI allowed things to escalate.
Justify your argument to the innocent policeman who I believe got killed while doing their duty by the roadside. In many cases, I believe the Tesla cars did not even slow down. The cars keep going at high speed because the AI CANNOT EVALUATE OFF-NORMAL SCENARIOS, and then hand it over to you with a few seconds' notice WHEN IT HAS ALREADY FUCKED UP AND YOU'RE IN DEEP SHIT because the car is still at high speed.
IT IS A DEFECTIVE AND DEADLY FEATURE. Also, FUCK THE NHTSA for enabling manslaughter.
It's not meant to do any of those things in its current state. If you see someone on the side of the road and you're concerned they might do something you should be taking manual control immediately. Not the car's fault if you don't and let it operate in situations it's not currently meant to handle.
The cars are not fully "self driving", they have "auto-pilot". Auto-pilot is not meant to do all the work, it's meant to offload certain tasks while you maintain full control and monitor it.
Maybe in the future when the tech is improved it can be fully self-driving but you can't get there if you don't put the AI out there on the road for it to improve (though general improvments in AI will most likely also be needed). But in it's current state, it's perfectly safe if the driver is doing what they're supossed to be doing. No where near "defective", it does what it's meant to do and doesn't do what it isn't.
Your irrational hatred and fear of auto-pilot is just that; irrational.
An auto-pilot is fine for aviators. Often you can glide for a while in an emergency. It's not 100% risk-free of course, but planes are assumed to fly in empty air and pilots are trained for various emergency scenarios. I don't even think autopilots in planes are linked to radar, so in all likelihood they are just assuming empty air.
Not so vehicles. Technology is completely different. Why are you comparing apples and eggs? In a scene, there is a lot to interpret. You interpret wrong once per million hours, there will still be a lot of casualties. And that is just road pattern recognition. By plowiing into policemen by the roadside (in China, reported by ZH), Tesla's autopilot has shown an inability to intepret anything higher-level.
So, really why are you comparing apples and eggs? Why are you even making such an argument? Maybe because you have Tesla stock? I have actually read plenty of the DARPA Grand Challenge research papers, I have no doubt rollout of the tech will get lots of people killed. Nobody has a magic solution. It only sort of works in controlled conditions, for example, limited low-intensity routes.
Unleash Tesla autopilot on the general populace? Manslaughter 100%.
Bottom line, hordes of people are not going to use the Tesla "autopilot" in the proper way. The very term is misleading in the extreme.
Why, salesmen told prospective buyers that the car could almost drive itself.
Why did you think recently the two men slammed into a tree and died? Both I believe were professionals, and one was demonstrating the feature to the other. Did they remember to use it like you say it should be used? Even those two professionals have no appreciation of the limitations of the technology. So they died.
If Tesla car drivers are trained and disciplined like pilots, then sure, by all means let them try out the beta feature.
But they are not. And that means it's manslaughter.
Fuck man! Why Elon. He’s doing such cool shit and changing the world! Why does he have to be one of the baddies? Most of these celebrities don’t bother me. But I really like him. This bothers me to know he is one of them.
Put not your faith in men.
I know where you are coming from. In this world we need heroes and leadership models. But, this dude was preselected by the bankers for nefarious reasons. There are plenty of other real geniuses and innovators out there who have had their work stolen or been knocked off.
Well THAT settles THAT. NEVER TRUSTED HIM. To all those EM sycophants FUCK HIM. Married to vile filth. Or are they married? Yeah, it MATTERS. How bout some autists doing a thread about The Boring Company? With all the talk about DUMBS, has there been a digg on it? Q Post 3787 mentions BORING, but it’s a stretch as that Post is about DNC Crowdstrike $. But It’s all Cap’d that way, strange.
“Be careful who you follow -Q”
It also mentions “SKY EVENT”. I take that possibly to mean Project Blue Beam mass ufo event? Follow me here. Who could pull that off ie holograms? EM could. So we got SkyLink/SkyNet haahh whatever it’s called IDC. How could you pull-off a massive hologram event though? Maybe they know how. I dunno gang, probably wrong but it just kinda hit me so I thought I’d write it here like my finger isn’t numb enough.
1328 May 10, 2018 4:02:52 PM EDT Q !4pRcUA0lBE Patriot.
If that doesn't convince you then look at this post from a while back:
https://greatawakening.win/p/12izpnbjue/anons--elon-musk-digz--the-fake-/
China's economic prosperity is completely due to investor greed that led to the outsourcing of manufacturing by the civilized nations of the world to the slave labor communist party, who went on to steal our IP and called it their own. We stupidly taught them everything they know so that we could have cheap stuff.
How do you spell tesla in mandarin? Asking for a carpet bagger.
I think Space X is cool and all... but after he starting tweeting to help manipulate Bitcoin dumps that pissed me off. I think he likes to screw around with everyone just because he can.
Elon Musk has been referred to as the next Einstein by those that wish to prop him up in the normie-science-fanatic population. Those that have researched Einstein know he is a cross-dressing zionist fraud that married his cousin.
This smells like "very fine people".
I dont care about Elon musk. I only care about SpaceX.