Australia - 20,000... Canada - 45,288... Germany - 100,000... India - 96,000... Russia - 45,000... Spain - 20,000... United Kingdom - 112,853... United States - 460,000...
OH Sorry, I Meant children that have gone missing so far this year without a Fucking peep from the Media...!!!!!
That paper is insufficient. Their statistics are mostly meaningless (confidence intervals are HUGE). Such a large confidence interval (30%, 15% on each side) suggests that their sample size data was far too small to be drawing conclusions with the precision they have suggested. Reporting a 3 digit percent (99.8%) when the confidence interval is 15% is at best false advertising, and at worst fraud.
They also provide no source data. They do not give a break down of their data collection methods. They do not give access to their database. There are many problems with this report.
Perhaps more important, but also more difficult to prove is that the DOJ (who created the report) is in bed with the C_A, who are the world's largest child traffickers. If there is anyone who would provide a fraudulent report to diminish the potential fear that 800k missing children would produce in the population, its the DOJ/FBI (since it would never be the C_A itself).
I appreciate the evidence. It isn't nothing, but there are problems with it, and it is by no means good evidence, even if it isn't bad evidence.
I'm still waiting for evidence to the contrary to refute it. I'm disappointed that your pseudo-intellectual response didn't. That's a lot of words for saying so little.
I gave evidence that their reporting methods are mathematically flawed. If you understood what a confidence interval was, you would understand that you can't report "99.8%" of anything and have it mean anything with a confidence interval of 30 fucking percent. Its ludicrous.
I have also given reasonable protests as to why they have not provided convincing evidence.
Its like pointing me to a fact checker and saying "here's the proof" except in this case there is no other sources of the information because there is reason to believe that the foxes are guarding the henhouse. Q told us that the C_A are the largest child trafficking ring in the world. We have seen direct evidence that the DOJ and FBI are in bed with the C_A. Dismissing it as nothing is disingenuous. I absolutely agree it is not good evidence, but it isn't bad either.
I'm not sure why you are making ad hominem attacks instead of addressing my protests directly. I admit I did not "prove" anything (nor did I intend to), but I have given reasonable protests for the document you have provided.
I'm still waiting. Thanks.