This paper was pulled off of LinkedIn within hours of being posted and the scientist censored. It is from a noted molecular epidemiologist who hypothesizes that the obvious consequence of this hard push for vaccination is to create immune escape variants. I know many of us here are looking for truly malevolent reasons for this vaccine. Population reduction is an often mentioned reason. But this paper postulates a simpler answer.
If this paper is the real reason, then the interpretation would seem to be that the deep state can not afford to let this pandemic die naturally. The fact is, without the vaccines, the mutation rate of this virus would be glacial, and within a few months it would all be over. Since they clearly need this to go on for years, the only way they can extend the timeframe is through vaccines.
If enough people resist getting the jab, they will not be able to create enough new variants to keep the scam going. Hence, the push to get everyone vaccinated.
I have never found the malevolent interpretations of this push for mass vaccination to be satisfactory. I understand the process of R&D. There are just too many people involved. There is too much risk that the formulations would not have had the side effect the DS wanted, and they wouldn't be able to control the final formulations that individual scientists came up with. This however...this is exactly what the technology was intended to do, so no matter what path any individual researcher took, they were guaranteed to wind up with this result. I suspect this may have been the real reason all along, and any population reduction through adverse reactions is just a bonus for them.
They have to get to 2030 i.e. Agenda 2030.
So it would achieve that and many assumed it would take approx 10 years to actually create a real genuine fully approved vaccine, give or take a few years.
The Booster would get around the need to hit the 80% first time methinks. That would keep the show going. There sure is a increase in deaths. That might be seen as a bonus but there are so many unknown when it comes to how it will effect peoples reproduction.
Can you see this going for 10 years? No one seems to realise that was the proposition form nearly all Governments early on excepting the USA/Trump admin.
Makes sense since this might be the final play they have left. They have to milk it long enough to figure out what to do next in light of the audits, impending financial collapse, etc. Policy is getting piped through the CCP WHO and usual global groups.
Seems plausible but we can still easily get plenty of “malevolent”:
Repeat steps 1-9 in perpetuity and watch the depop rack up gradually and consistently over time.
This is great insight. I've always felt that the de-population angle was lacking in some way, except maybe for driving infertility.