"84. Federal actors are also sharing the fruits of Facebook censorship of Plaintiff and Members of the Class. These benefits include (without limitation):  The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the White House have used Defendants to inexpensively and effectively promote their directives, messages, and policies concerning COVID-19; and suppress contradictory medical views and content.  suppression of information suggesting or showing flaws in CDC and/or other federal governmental policy  increasing the number of visitors to the CDC’s website;  boosting the CDC’s highly questionable reputation as reliable and authoritative in its factual and policy determinations;  creating a false impression of unequivocal support in the scientific community for the CDC and other governmental directives;  and suppression of opinions and information that might lead people to take actions contrary to the government’s preferences.

"60. Below are just some examples of Democrat legislators threatening new regulations, antitrust breakup, and removal of Section 230 immunity for Defendants and other social media platforms if Facebook did not censor views and content with which these Members of Congress disagreed, including the views and content of Plaintiff and the Putative Class Members:  “But I do think that for the privilege of 230, there has to be a bigger sense of responsibility on it. And it is not out of the question that that could be removed.” (Rep. Nancy Pelosi, Speaker of the House, April 12, 2019);  “The idea that it’s a tech company is that Section 230 should be revoked, immediately should be revoked, number one. For Zuckerberg and other platforms.” (Joe Biden/Interview in December of 2019 and published January 2020);

"65. The message conveyed by Democrat legislators to Defendants was clear: use the authority of Section 230 to ban Plaintiff and those Putative Class Members who posted content and views contrary to these legislators preferred points of view or lose the competitive protections of Section 230 and tens of billions of dollars of market share altogether.

excellent - even the oversight board said the trump deplatforming was bogus! "44. Facebook’s own Oversight Board concluded that the January 21 indefinite deplatforming of President Trump lacked any basis in its existing, consistently applied community standards. See Facebook Oversight Board, Case decision 2021-001-FB-FBR."

"47. Defendant Zuckerberg was personally involved in, and personally responsible for the decision to deplatform President Trump. On the morning of January 7, 2021, Zuckerberg informed high-ranking Facebook officers of his decision that Plaintiff’s Facebook account should be suspended indefinitely.