Does anyone know of any real arguments Q might not be real? All I seem to hear is retarded shit like "Q's predictions have never come true" from cunts who don't even know what it is
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (66)
sorted by:
If that did happen, the Operation would have been a failure. People's lives are on the line.
What we got are proofs; numerous time-sensitive cases of probable deniability that, when taken all together indicate a statistical impossibility that it is simply coincidence.
Honestly, what more can I do to convince you? Probably nothing, because you're not willing to be convinced by anyone other than yourself. Which leaves you with one option:
Read through the first 2500 Q posts.
That section of time has the largest volume of proof events. The sheer volume of "happy coincidence" events coinciding with Trump's Twitter feed is shocking.
In summation...
Effectively, you're asking me to explain in detail the proofs in something as extensive as the Old Testament which indicate it is based on real historic events without having actually read the Old Testament AND also not even bothering to look at alternate sources of History as well. Which leaves me with no foundation to begin making connections.
In other words, no matter HOW I phrase it, your lack of prerequisite knowledge in the matter means you'll never be able to make the connections. If you continue to not read what is absolutely required to understand just how extensively Q has been proven, I can't help you. There's a term for that state of mind and it's called willful ignorance.
Let me try to help you understand this way.
I am absolutely certain the sun is actually an alien egg, and the alien inside is controlling our minds and making people homosexual, and the only way to save us is to blow it up.
You’d call me a lunatic.
I would say it makes perfect sense, as long as you read my fifteen hundred pages of vague prophecies and decode messages sent by the alien’s thralls. You need to read it to understand, and if you don’t, then you’re being fucking ignorant and it’s not my fault.
You’d call me a lunatic, and ask why you should invest literally any time in proving my theory by reading my resource.
If I’m just a nameless person, you ignore me and move on with your life.
If it turns out I’m an astrophysicist who specializes in solar science, you’d still think I’m a lunatic, but you might be interested in seeing if I could prove what I’m saying and read my sources.
If I claim to be an astrophysicist but I have to stay hidden and can’t prove it because otherwise the Sun Alien will kill me, you would ignore me and move on with your life.
That’s what Q is for nonbelievers. Instead of a Sun Egg Alien, you are telling me that Trump and a nameless internet phantom are responsible for fighting an international cabal of pedophilic vampires, and it makes some sense if I just accept that as the truth and then read all your sources and try to make the same connections.
I might be willing to entertain that if Q is who he claims to be. But if I can’t prove it, then I assume he’s just another random guy ranting about sun aliens. And there are a million of them, and Q hasn’t distinguished himself with actual proof that he is who he says he is.
So most people just ignore it and move on.
If you can’t prove that Q is the astrophysicist in my analogy, then that’s the likely fate of any Great Awakening. People ignoring it, because nobody besides GAW accepts that Q is who he claims to be.
Does that help? The first step is always to verify who is talking to you. If you can’t do that, you can’t (and shouldn’t) trust a single word you hear. And I can’t verify who Q is or what his credentials are yet.
You're talking to the wrong dude for that line of thought, my friend.
I'll read/investigate just about anything, no matter how asinine it might seem at its premise. I'm of the "include all angles, regardless of where they originate, and eliminate the fallacies" camp.
No one should be happy settling on the knowledge they have. If you stop learning, you stop living, and you don't know what you don't know.
My name is accurate in more way than one. I'm always half asleep, both physically and psychologically, which allows me to explore the craziest notions and not get too attached. Most of my family, as I have come to find out, do not have this filter and I've now learned to be careful in sharing the more insane theories I read because they begin to think that I think they are real.
As far as Q goes, I think the primary conflict with your understanding is this:
I'm trying to show you WHAT Q is.
You want to know WHO Q is.
The latter will likely never come to pass, so your disappointment will be perpetual.
If you want hard proofs, without doing the work yourself, there are tons of videos compiling them all.
Is that what you want?
This one and its sequel convinced me that it wasn't just mere coincidence: https://www.bitchute.com/video/4cQc9X9l0a5Y/
If you won't read it from the horses mouth, and you won't watch the above, and you won't look look at what I've provided in retrospect, then I can't help you.
Which is the problem, really. Normies just can't think like autists. Some brains just can't put the pieces together without it being spelled out for them, I guess. Some people can solve picture mazes by sight alone, and some people can't. No one is to blame, it's just how it is.