I see some linking the time of Trump taking the stage at 11:04 am to Q post 1104 which does makes sense. But I also conjecture it could be Law of War marker 11.4. This game is heating up. https://qalerts.app/?q=11.4
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (23)
sorted by:
I’ve noticed people linking time to the Q posts. 11:04 relates to post 11:04. Could be. Seems simple enough. When you get to pm you just switch to military time. That makes sense also. However, this eliminates being able to link to posts after 2400. Also it eliminates posts from 60-99 since it is not anywhere on a clock. Either Q has purposely made any post ending in 60-99 as well as posts after 2359 something he knows he will not link to.
We could “think mirror” and use the time backwards to allow posts above 2359 so 11:04 would link to post 4011 however, we still are unable to link many of the posts.
Maybe we need to find another type of link that allows the Q team to link to all the drops.
What are we missing?
At some point, we are just twisting the conditions to fit any post, though. You can find a connection to any post if you stretch your scope enough.
Personally I don't even worry about proofs anymore. What is there to prove, either the plan unfolds or it doesn't. At this point I think most of us are more concerned with tangible events and updates.
I'd wager that the bending over backwards to find a relevant q post turns off newer users and confirms in their mind that we're looking for any connection no matter how loose.
I agree. Q is proven. I trust The Plan and stand at the ready. I do my best to understand [ God knows my heart] and pray for direction...ready for Him to move my feet.
Same here... I no longer need anymore "proofs". Common sense dictates that enough proof has already been pointed out.
All patterns and coincidences exist for a reason. Either its parts were deliberately aligned in such a way so as to be noticed by someone, or the pattern was constructed in our minds, and does not reflect the intentions of whoever could have arranged for the coincidence. Every connection or realization has to go through some amount of interpretation in our minds, regardless of whether they carry some intent, message, or truth. It’s up to us to judge just how much we are “stretching” our logic with every connection we make.
Yup, unless it's obvious
I agree, but it's important to acknowledge that someone just discovering Q and the drops did not come to learn of the posts daily as the were happening in real time the way many of us have.
It can be a benefit to the relative newbies to see the level of coordination.
Maybe a daily post with some throwback on-the-nose posts (a few a day) would really drive the point home without a casual on-looker having to delve deeply into a long video or the book of proofs.
Just an idea.
I always wanted a Q Drop scraper/aggregator which had the ability to have content tags per drop - Epstein, HRC, Hussein, trafficking, DS, etc.
While your point about eligible drop #s being limited to certain ones due to timestamp limitations is valid, if this is the meticulously planned MIL op we believe it is, then that level of detail is not off the table.
Q is the one who taught us to look to timestamps.
It's also worth mentioning that with the depth and breadth of topics covered in the almost 5k of drops, (Spygate, cabal, Rothschilds, Epstein, Haiti, Clintons, Hussein, etc.), that there's a specific over the target corellation of 1104 and 1105 being about Big Tech when Trump's presser announcing a class action lawsuit against the two biggest social media companies?
That's pretty spot on, even on the face of it.