The damages that are occurring in some people from the vaccines are related solely to the spike protein.
A lot of the "side effects" and "shedding" effects are non-sensical and medically impossible.
However, yes, the mRNA vaccines can cause damage, so let's look at potentially tackling that.
Ivermectin has shown anti-viral properties by inhibiting replication of SARS-CoV-2 via "docking" to the spike protein. This was already known prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, so when they say it doesn't have sound backing, that's BS.
Overall, ACE inhibitors have demonstrated protective factors in patients and may help to counteract immune hyperactivation.
So, if you're looking at how to protect yourself from the fallout of the vaccine, then yes - it's as possible as it is in people infected with COVID-19.
You're looking at a regime of anti-viral and ACE inhibiting properties in order to protect.
That can be achieved both medically and naturally. Dandelion extract has shown some positive effects, HCQ and its family, as well as Ivermectin, Pine Needle Tea, NAC etc.
Your main concerns are a)keeping the blood from clotting excessively, b) protecting the cardiovascular system and c) stopping spike proteins from attaching to cell walls and d) reducing inflammation in order to prevent immune hyperactivation.
Your treatment will need to be protective and preventative. No one thing will be the thing. I would also advise people get their bloods done prior to vaccines. That way you have a baseline of your condition and you can monitor it and trouble shoot it accordingly.
Anyone who fear mongers that the vaccine damages DNA is an idiot. "Internet research" does not equate to even the most basic medical training.
Sorry- my friend is a molecular biologist and she has professionally informed me that anyone that makes a claim about DNA doesn't know sh$# about it. What is known is that next to nothing is known. They're still stabbing in the dark.
mRNA isn't a super new technology, it's been studied plenty.
If she was reading her journals like she's supposed to (I'm pressing X to doubt on her existence) then she would know this.
There is no stabbing in the dark and mRNA isn't the issue here. The issue is the spiked protein. mRNA technology can deliver X,Y or Z. The issue is what it is delivering.
*Modified RNA *can affect DNA. However, mRNA is not modified RNA. It's merely the building blocks or the "script" for creating proteins. We know plenty about mRNA. What we DON'T KNOW is the long term effects of the spiked protein on the body - we can have a guess, as with previous Coronavirus research (which isn't good), but mRNA isn't the issue. Hence why we have issues with AD26 and other type vaccines. It all comes back to the spike protein.
If you're going to "muh uncle works at Nintendo" me, at least pretend you know what you're talking about.
I don't know a lot about this, but she does. She manages the lab at a university. What I communicated to you is that what is known about DNA is severely limited- they are spitballing when the mess with it. mRNA is a method with which to mess with it. I am aware, as are most people, that the spike protein is the issue. My point was that you acting like you are an expert on DNA is B.S. Even the experts don't know jack. Have a lovely day.
The damages that are occurring in some people from the vaccines are related solely to the spike protein.
A lot of the "side effects" and "shedding" effects are non-sensical and medically impossible.
However, yes, the mRNA vaccines can cause damage, so let's look at potentially tackling that.
Ivermectin has shown anti-viral properties by inhibiting replication of SARS-CoV-2 via "docking" to the spike protein. This was already known prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, so when they say it doesn't have sound backing, that's BS.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32871846/
Overall, ACE inhibitors have demonstrated protective factors in patients and may help to counteract immune hyperactivation.
So, if you're looking at how to protect yourself from the fallout of the vaccine, then yes - it's as possible as it is in people infected with COVID-19.
You're looking at a regime of anti-viral and ACE inhibiting properties in order to protect. That can be achieved both medically and naturally. Dandelion extract has shown some positive effects, HCQ and its family, as well as Ivermectin, Pine Needle Tea, NAC etc. Your main concerns are a)keeping the blood from clotting excessively, b) protecting the cardiovascular system and c) stopping spike proteins from attaching to cell walls and d) reducing inflammation in order to prevent immune hyperactivation.
Your treatment will need to be protective and preventative. No one thing will be the thing. I would also advise people get their bloods done prior to vaccines. That way you have a baseline of your condition and you can monitor it and trouble shoot it accordingly.
Anyone who fear mongers that the vaccine damages DNA is an idiot. "Internet research" does not equate to even the most basic medical training.
Sorry- my friend is a molecular biologist and she has professionally informed me that anyone that makes a claim about DNA doesn't know sh$# about it. What is known is that next to nothing is known. They're still stabbing in the dark.
mRNA isn't a super new technology, it's been studied plenty. If she was reading her journals like she's supposed to (I'm pressing X to doubt on her existence) then she would know this.
There is no stabbing in the dark and mRNA isn't the issue here. The issue is the spiked protein. mRNA technology can deliver X,Y or Z. The issue is what it is delivering.
*Modified RNA *can affect DNA. However, mRNA is not modified RNA. It's merely the building blocks or the "script" for creating proteins. We know plenty about mRNA. What we DON'T KNOW is the long term effects of the spiked protein on the body - we can have a guess, as with previous Coronavirus research (which isn't good), but mRNA isn't the issue. Hence why we have issues with AD26 and other type vaccines. It all comes back to the spike protein.
If you're going to "muh uncle works at Nintendo" me, at least pretend you know what you're talking about.
I don't know a lot about this, but she does. She manages the lab at a university. What I communicated to you is that what is known about DNA is severely limited- they are spitballing when the mess with it. mRNA is a method with which to mess with it. I am aware, as are most people, that the spike protein is the issue. My point was that you acting like you are an expert on DNA is B.S. Even the experts don't know jack. Have a lovely day.