Sorry- my friend is a molecular biologist and she has professionally informed me that anyone that makes a claim about DNA doesn't know sh$# about it. What is known is that next to nothing is known. They're still stabbing in the dark.
mRNA isn't a super new technology, it's been studied plenty.
If she was reading her journals like she's supposed to (I'm pressing X to doubt on her existence) then she would know this.
There is no stabbing in the dark and mRNA isn't the issue here. The issue is the spiked protein. mRNA technology can deliver X,Y or Z. The issue is what it is delivering.
*Modified RNA *can affect DNA. However, mRNA is not modified RNA. It's merely the building blocks or the "script" for creating proteins. We know plenty about mRNA. What we DON'T KNOW is the long term effects of the spiked protein on the body - we can have a guess, as with previous Coronavirus research (which isn't good), but mRNA isn't the issue. Hence why we have issues with AD26 and other type vaccines. It all comes back to the spike protein.
If you're going to "muh uncle works at Nintendo" me, at least pretend you know what you're talking about.
I don't know a lot about this, but she does. She manages the lab at a university. What I communicated to you is that what is known about DNA is severely limited- they are spitballing when the mess with it. mRNA is a method with which to mess with it. I am aware, as are most people, that the spike protein is the issue. My point was that you acting like you are an expert on DNA is B.S. Even the experts don't know jack. Have a lovely day.
Sorry- my friend is a molecular biologist and she has professionally informed me that anyone that makes a claim about DNA doesn't know sh$# about it. What is known is that next to nothing is known. They're still stabbing in the dark.
mRNA isn't a super new technology, it's been studied plenty. If she was reading her journals like she's supposed to (I'm pressing X to doubt on her existence) then she would know this.
There is no stabbing in the dark and mRNA isn't the issue here. The issue is the spiked protein. mRNA technology can deliver X,Y or Z. The issue is what it is delivering.
*Modified RNA *can affect DNA. However, mRNA is not modified RNA. It's merely the building blocks or the "script" for creating proteins. We know plenty about mRNA. What we DON'T KNOW is the long term effects of the spiked protein on the body - we can have a guess, as with previous Coronavirus research (which isn't good), but mRNA isn't the issue. Hence why we have issues with AD26 and other type vaccines. It all comes back to the spike protein.
If you're going to "muh uncle works at Nintendo" me, at least pretend you know what you're talking about.
I don't know a lot about this, but she does. She manages the lab at a university. What I communicated to you is that what is known about DNA is severely limited- they are spitballing when the mess with it. mRNA is a method with which to mess with it. I am aware, as are most people, that the spike protein is the issue. My point was that you acting like you are an expert on DNA is B.S. Even the experts don't know jack. Have a lovely day.