About a year ago, in March of 2020 I believe, Trump mentioned he wanted prayers because he was about to make the most difficult decision of his life.
Any spectulation of what that was?
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (169)
sorted by:
So you'd be okay with getting the vaccine and not worry about anything? What of all the adverse reactions?
I have said I am not getting the shot, and my wife is not getting the shot. We would rather use therapeutics if we got Covid. (We also don't get the flu shot, normally.)
"What of all the adverse reactions?" You mean the stories you've seen distributed to you from the media and big tech? Or from anonymous people you've never met in person, and they all seemingly share the same or similar story?
I would say we are looking at a professional propaganda campaign: It is a combination of truth, lies, and well-intentioned misperception.
This is what makes this lie so good - our community has a natural fear of vaccines (for good reason, at times), and it is exploited. Now, anytime in the patriot family someone dies or is diagnosed with something, it reinforces this false narrative. We don't stop to consider that people do still get ill, and get cancer, and have heart attacks, and die - but now we have a new evil to blame. FIrst it was the virus, now it is the vaccine.
Bottom line: Trump would be truly guilty of genocide if this vaccine was poison. It is NOT the way to MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN.
I know several people directly who were unwell for several days. Thankfully no deaths, but I firmly believe this isn't just saline being pumped.
I never said it was saline.
I said it wasn't the poison the Cabal would have liked it to be.
In my personal experience these aren't stories for me but these are real happenings for people I know who were perfectly healthy, got the double jabs, and are now having unexplained health issues a few weeks/months afterwards. I've noticed this primarily amongst some of my co-workers and one family friend.
Can I prove that their jabs are linked to their health conditions? No. Should I believe the 'science' that claims these jabs are safe when we know there are better alternative treatments available? No. One of the main challenges right now is the science can't be trusted, things are happening too fast, any contrary opinions to the mainstream medical opinions are being censored and shut down on main stream and social media platforms. Just this alone should raise many red flags since we should be allowed to discuss differing opinions. This is clearly not the case and I do agree that this works against us in some ways and helps reinforce the narrative that the conspiracy theorists are crazy loons who should be censored and their opinions disregarded.
In my mind there are some significant things going on that are contributing to side-effects, complications, and deaths for some people who get the jabs. One is there might be toxins, poisons, or chemicals in some (or all) of these jabs that cause people to react in ways that either make them sick, have no immediate short term impact, or kill them outright. If you don't believe my claims and if we can trust sources such as Open VAERS covid data (https://www.openvaers.com/covid-data) check for yourself. As of this posting there are slightly over 9k deaths just from the COVID jabs. It's generally understood among the community that these numbers are likely under reported and if we had 100% real transparent numbers and data, these figures might be much higher. Nonetheless, even with these numbers alone, under conventional vaccine development, these jabs are unfit for mass public consumption but were rushed out under emergency use authorization, aka warp speed. We think Trump did this to give us the choice/option to take or not take these shots and it couldn't be mandated on us with an FDA badge of approval as may have been the original plan. If this was the true motive for warp speed, it may have saved many more lives if Trump was between a rock and a hard place. But if this is true, it means the ending is inevitable and significant loss of life is coming no matter what choice was made in pushing that program out faster than it might have come out.
The bigger concern here in my opinion is if you listen to opinions of doctors who are calling out the main stream opinions then you will have heard these doctors claim that mass vaccination in the middle of a 'pandemic' is putting artificial pressures on the vaccine to mutate much faster then it normally would especially if the original jabs were built to protect against the original Wuhan spike protein which we know current strains of CVD19 floating around now have already mutated (i.e. delta variant and the other ones that will come). If the vaccines are accelerating the rate at which these variants may surface combined with a full fledged media propaganda machine that will never share this opinion then it's pretty obvious what is going to happen next over the next 1-2 years or sooner. If things play in this direction, both unjabbed + jabbed might drop off, but the unjabbed will be blamed as the source for causing the variant.
Even if I'm completely wrong, you have to consider the mainstream/accepted opinions against the fringe theories combined with your own personal experience and observations and form your own intelligent opinion of what to do. Mis/dis-information is being used to justify centralizing and controlling the internet and patriots (including myself) fall into this trap way too easily and it's not helping our cause.
Bottom line is if you can critically think, read, learn, and try to connect the dots and project possibilities based on what is happening now, the answer for you should be obvious for what to do, especially if you didn't get the jab and your are still alive and healthy right now.
If the shots work as claimed by CDC, and as documented in medical journals, they are definitely harmful and the reports in VAERS are more or less what would be expected (undercounted by at least 10x of course).
Aside from the immediate and long term side effects, it also seems likely they set the recipient up for greater vulnerability to serious illness from similar viruses (e.g. colds) as the antibody levels reduce over time. If that is true then once you get the initial shot, you have to keep getting boosters or you have massively increased risk from what would be insignificant viruses to a non-vaxxed person. And every booster is rolling the dice on short/long term side effects, and incrementally destroying your remaining immune system. People will grow to hate those boosters.
This hasn't been proven to be the case yet, but it's a distinct possibility.
So, IMO we have to live with the unfortunate fact that better than 50% of our population is kind of fucked, including nearly everyone I know and care about. It's going to be tough but if it ushers in a new era of awakening and roots out the corruption in the process, I think we'll bounce back in a generation or two. Those of us remaining will need to start making kids though.
Imagine what WWII was like in Germany.. or any number of other massive calamities throughout history. The losses are incalculable, but somehow those remaining still create the future.
After all the lies from the CDC and the prominent medical authorities and organizations over the last 18 months, folks here are still quoting them as sources for their new fears.
Amazing.
I'm not saying the CDC is not lying about most things. AFAICT they in fact ARE lying about some aspects of the mechanism of the shots. My point was that even if you take what they say as true, what they describe is dangerous.
I'm just having trouble believing that somehow these shots are NOT dangerous, contrary to everything we have learned about them.
Maybe I'm misunderstanding the point you are trying to make. I thought you were saying that these shots are NOT going to cause large scale death and suffering, that anecdotal reports on social media and VAERS reporting is not indicative of these shots' true nature. It is my opinion that both of those signals are fairly accurate and in fact the worst is yet to come.
Also, to clarify, when I say documented in medical journals, I am talking about things like the documented fact that subjects post vaccination have free floating spikes in their bloodstream at various times.
https://academic.oup.com/cid/advance-article/doi/10.1093/cid/ciab465/6279075
Note that the authors did not seem to be too concerned about this finding. My interpretation was hmm, that's a free floating antigen I don't WANT in my bloodstream, and it can and does cause a lot of problems like strokes, heart attacks, inflammation, etc.
It's always important to separate the bullshit conclusion/narrative of an article from the facts it establishes - like how the CDC found that masks "slow the spread" by maybe 1%, but since 1>0, it's still worth it. Just because the topline conclusion they draw is wrong, doesn't mean that the data revealed in the study is wrong. The fact that the best they can do is publish counter-narrative data with a pro-narrative wrapup tells me the situation is if anything far worse for their narrative than the data suggests.