I honestly don’t think a TikTok video from a guy looking to prove a point like this is considered strong evidence that Biden could only win through election fraud.
The late night shows do exactly this same thing to Trump supporters, and I don’t believe them when they do it either. These videos specifically look for the stupidest responses and cut them together.
Please do not fall for that sort of poppycock. You call yourself a researcher. Act like one.
I have a problem with a video that claims to show one thing, but I have no proof it actually shows the thing it claims.
The video maker has a vested interest in proving himself right. The video is cut and edited so I can’t see how many people actually did recognize Biden.
He could have had a thousand takes over three weeks and just used the four people who embarrassed themselves for his video.
The video isn’t the problem because it’s a video. It’s a problem because I can’t verify how he made this video.
And as a researcher, the methodology behind any evidence is crucial to understanding the credibility of that evidence. Absolutely, unimpeachably crucial.
You’re the one trying to convince me of a point. You’re the one trying to cause a great awakening.
Why don’t you go out, walk down the street with a picture of Joe Biden, and film the results? One long take, no cuts, no editing. Go to multiple places in town, get a variety of demographics in your video.
Then you will have made more credible evidence than the video you showed me.
I honestly don’t think a TikTok video from a guy looking to prove a point like this is considered strong evidence that Biden could only win through election fraud.
The late night shows do exactly this same thing to Trump supporters, and I don’t believe them when they do it either. These videos specifically look for the stupidest responses and cut them together.
Please do not fall for that sort of poppycock. You call yourself a researcher. Act like one.
I don’t have a problem with a video.
I have a problem with a video that claims to show one thing, but I have no proof it actually shows the thing it claims.
The video maker has a vested interest in proving himself right. The video is cut and edited so I can’t see how many people actually did recognize Biden.
He could have had a thousand takes over three weeks and just used the four people who embarrassed themselves for his video.
The video isn’t the problem because it’s a video. It’s a problem because I can’t verify how he made this video.
And as a researcher, the methodology behind any evidence is crucial to understanding the credibility of that evidence. Absolutely, unimpeachably crucial.
I don’t like spending that much taxpayer money on debunking a TikTok video.
Why not you?
You’re the one trying to convince me of a point. You’re the one trying to cause a great awakening.
Why don’t you go out, walk down the street with a picture of Joe Biden, and film the results? One long take, no cuts, no editing. Go to multiple places in town, get a variety of demographics in your video.
Then you will have made more credible evidence than the video you showed me.