(motivated by finding out that NSW is cycling 45 times)(for the US boiz i think your highest cycle rate was 30-35 and dropped to 20ish the day biden was installed)
rough draft: running 45 cycles duplicates the DNA test sample 35 trillion fkn times with a chance to mutate each duplication they heat the DNA until it breaks into 2 halves then grow the missing half back using enzymes "Taq polymerase" giving you 2 full strands (cloning), this repeats exponentially each cycle, 1 2 4 8 16 32 64 ect ect 45 cycles = 2^45 = 35,000,000,000,000 you can take any rate of mutation and apply it to that number and it doesn't matter how many matches to the sequence of covid you need for a positive test result at that point, you'll get them.
And they don't even use the full genetic code of the virus, they're just using a portion of it, the reasoning is it's too expensive and takes too long to analyse during an emergency.
PCR tests are meant to be used around 5-10 cycles and that's just to find out if it's likely that a virus might be present in the test sample and is mainly just for doing research, it's not even made for diagnosis of infections. (coming from the nobel prize winner who invented it)
They determine a positive result by a set number of matches to the SARS COV-2 sequence out of the 35 trillion samples with a huge chuck of them being mutated ones, 0.5% would be 1.75 trillion mutated samples, (can't find required number of matches best i could find is that the parameters are set by the manufacturers)
I have heard that the sequence being used was just sent over from China in an email when the outbreak first started and that's been the only global standard sequence since it started. (could dig up source, further investigation needed)
He tells a story about how it made him believe the Buddhist idea that "everything contains everything" (or how ever it goes) because you can create every sequence in the human body in 1 billion mutations if they were all unique and all mutated, just 30 cycles. 30 cycles = 1.07 billion samples
45 = 35 trillion samples. What are the odds that there is a shitload of matching sequences in there. Pretty damn high.
Nice.
This is the best breakdown on PCR cycle testing I've seen so far.
Fills in a lot of gaps.
Thanks.
Agreed
Just had a discussion about the PRC cycle today with someone....saving this for when I see them tomorrow! Thank you fren...
Blessings...
Nice, working on this to try and show people at the Freedom Day rally this weekend.
I commend you for your work to enlighten people! This is important for them to understand that not only wasn't this test made for viruses but the most important point is the manipulation of the cycling to obtain the "positive" conclusion.
I usually get the blank stare when I bring this up to those who were tested...patience is key ....but I don't "do" dumb well lol...
Good luck at the rally fren... We are behind freedom for all who are willing to stand up to tyranny...WWG1WGA...
Blessings!
Portugese courts determined 97% False Positive @ 35cycles.
https://covidwatching.org/portugal-takes-a-stand-against-flawed-pcr-test/
Thanks this article also brings up the Viral Load aspect which is one I missed. This article is shocked that they could be running 35 cycles but are hiding the info, my state is running FUCKING 45.
Case count = illusion by design. The pertinent question is HOW MANY PEOPLE ARE HOSPITALIZED and actually need medical treatment? The answer is very very few. That is why last year the focus shifted from deaths and ventillators to "cases" and testing. Need to feed the public fear provoking narrative (ie/ # of cases are rising) to justify government overreach and coerce the masses to trade freedom for "safety." More testing = more cases = more justification for control.
Stellar Post OP
Thank you I wanted to check this out myself
Copy pasta from discussion with my best friend, sorry if some parts are a bit slang.
be careful with your terminology but yes. it is not so much that it is mutating but you do run the risk of compounding replication errors as it transcribes each gene it splices. Often at the higher amplitudes your can find similar viruses but most often it is dead virus nucleotides this circulating or their was the tiniest amount of contamination throughout the process which is very possible due to the aerosoloization of the viral particles spread by someone infected. It is enough for one person getting tested to taint all the other results in a clinic with PCR too high.
Thanks i'll go over these and add what I can to the final copy :)