This seems like a horrid argument to me. Of course he needs to verify the people going to this as there will be a physical limit to the number of people allowed. He doesn't want people that have no chance of doing what he is looking for.
You are basically saying....because somebody else didn't pay (psychic debunkers) this can't be done. He has 37TB of data in the form of packet captures. Simply manipulating that amount of data looking for out of place info in the packets or anything of the like is going to take resources. He needs people that are basically high level network analyzers with a background in big data. You are simply crazy if you think this should be available to everyone who wants to play. Just to allow people into such an event he will have to have multiple copies of the data as one can't simply just move around 37TB of anything. The amount of money invested just to allow the best people he can find to try to disprove is a fantastic approach and nobody is interested in debunking a psychic here.
What about security? I mean do you have any idea what a capable person can pull out of such a set of logs? If this data were to get up and leave his possession what could be pulled? This data had to be sourced by a group with some amazing access/power. This was not joe blow in his basement slurping up packets. He is saying he has packets attacking states across the country. This isn't a single packet capture just grabbing up random data......this was all preplanned if he has what he says he does. Simply having this data, if it is legitimate shows you that the powers that be have EVERYTHING. Every single thing you do on the internet.....all of it....and someone gave it to Mike...because they knew what was happening.
I like the idea. I expect he will end up with at least 5 teams of people. I am hoping more like 15. Nobody does this work on their own. It will be a group effort. Different people attacking it from different perspectives with different methodologies. I personally like the idea and probably have enough network experience to understand the challenge at hand.
But if this data requires the level of security because it's vulnerable to being damaged and tanking the entire Plan because this data can prove in court that the election was stolen...
...then perhaps Lindell shouldn't be holding a contest with it. And should just, you know, put it into the court system.
If he's seriously holding what he says he's holding, then I want it in the places where it's going to make a difference. Now. Not serving as the centerpiece to some closed-door symposium challenge. Not being made available to any rando Lindell feels is worthy of messing around in the system to fact-check it.
well think of it from his perspective. He has 37TB of packet data....he got it from random dude that needs to remain anonymous as this person must have security clearance well beyond "going public with 37TB" Mike needs a way to verify the data without....."I paid some dude to make it show what i wanted". He is questioning himself at this point. He is doing it right. If he goes to court and it comes out then that he was had....well that would be a disaster.
And i don't think the data will be damaged. He won't just use the original copy. Court will be in due time....and i am worried about the security of people having this data off site. A lot of data can be pulled from a packet capture...that is where security can be an issue for the machines that got caught up in the capture.
This seems like a horrid argument to me. Of course he needs to verify the people going to this as there will be a physical limit to the number of people allowed. He doesn't want people that have no chance of doing what he is looking for.
You are basically saying....because somebody else didn't pay (psychic debunkers) this can't be done. He has 37TB of data in the form of packet captures. Simply manipulating that amount of data looking for out of place info in the packets or anything of the like is going to take resources. He needs people that are basically high level network analyzers with a background in big data. You are simply crazy if you think this should be available to everyone who wants to play. Just to allow people into such an event he will have to have multiple copies of the data as one can't simply just move around 37TB of anything. The amount of money invested just to allow the best people he can find to try to disprove is a fantastic approach and nobody is interested in debunking a psychic here.
What about security? I mean do you have any idea what a capable person can pull out of such a set of logs? If this data were to get up and leave his possession what could be pulled? This data had to be sourced by a group with some amazing access/power. This was not joe blow in his basement slurping up packets. He is saying he has packets attacking states across the country. This isn't a single packet capture just grabbing up random data......this was all preplanned if he has what he says he does. Simply having this data, if it is legitimate shows you that the powers that be have EVERYTHING. Every single thing you do on the internet.....all of it....and someone gave it to Mike...because they knew what was happening.
I like the idea. I expect he will end up with at least 5 teams of people. I am hoping more like 15. Nobody does this work on their own. It will be a group effort. Different people attacking it from different perspectives with different methodologies. I personally like the idea and probably have enough network experience to understand the challenge at hand.
All that might be true.
But if this data requires the level of security because it's vulnerable to being damaged and tanking the entire Plan because this data can prove in court that the election was stolen...
...then perhaps Lindell shouldn't be holding a contest with it. And should just, you know, put it into the court system.
If he's seriously holding what he says he's holding, then I want it in the places where it's going to make a difference. Now. Not serving as the centerpiece to some closed-door symposium challenge. Not being made available to any rando Lindell feels is worthy of messing around in the system to fact-check it.
well think of it from his perspective. He has 37TB of packet data....he got it from random dude that needs to remain anonymous as this person must have security clearance well beyond "going public with 37TB" Mike needs a way to verify the data without....."I paid some dude to make it show what i wanted". He is questioning himself at this point. He is doing it right. If he goes to court and it comes out then that he was had....well that would be a disaster.
And i don't think the data will be damaged. He won't just use the original copy. Court will be in due time....and i am worried about the security of people having this data off site. A lot of data can be pulled from a packet capture...that is where security can be an issue for the machines that got caught up in the capture.