The universe exists whether we are here to observe it or not. And I do agree that the spirit causes the temporal universe, the other user account can’t give a straight answer on it.
I don't buy into that classical interpretation of quantum physics that tries to explain away those quantum effects as the same as the observer effect (where measuring something has an impact on the something, ie, to get the pressure in a tire needs to release a bit of air to get the measurement meaning the actual pressure is different from what was measured because of releasing some pressure to get the reading).
So, IMO, without observers the universe would exist like Schrodinger's cat, both in a state of existing and not existing simultaneously, or a 'waveform potential' representing every potential configuration of the universe.
Well, it does make good fiction because they extrapolate these things in extreme, fictional ways.
Why? Because it helps push the secularity of the scientific realm, and if you're not already aware the premise of modern science was an antagonism to be able to explain all without appeal to the spiritual.
At a certain point the argument of a "quantum AND macro world" that are distinct and separate fails because the macro world is literally built up by the quantum.
This is why the large scale experiments with random number generators being influenced by intent have consistently and repeatedly shown a "weak, but statistically significant effect" (EVEN in the one where they printed the result without observer BEFORE the experiment, in attempt to merge in the Schrodinger's cat factor into the experiment)
The universe exists whether we are here to observe it or not. And I do agree that the spirit causes the temporal universe, the other user account can’t give a straight answer on it.
A waveform potential OF a temporal universe.
I don't buy into that classical interpretation of quantum physics that tries to explain away those quantum effects as the same as the observer effect (where measuring something has an impact on the something, ie, to get the pressure in a tire needs to release a bit of air to get the measurement meaning the actual pressure is different from what was measured because of releasing some pressure to get the reading).
So, IMO, without observers the universe would exist like Schrodinger's cat, both in a state of existing and not existing simultaneously, or a 'waveform potential' representing every potential configuration of the universe.
Yeah, I don’t buy into the whole “if there’s no observers, there’s a Schrödinger’s cat situation”.
It’s a mistaken application of Quantum-world effects on the macro-world. It makes for some cool sci-fi though.
Well, it does make good fiction because they extrapolate these things in extreme, fictional ways.
Why? Because it helps push the secularity of the scientific realm, and if you're not already aware the premise of modern science was an antagonism to be able to explain all without appeal to the spiritual.
At a certain point the argument of a "quantum AND macro world" that are distinct and separate fails because the macro world is literally built up by the quantum.
This is why the large scale experiments with random number generators being influenced by intent have consistently and repeatedly shown a "weak, but statistically significant effect" (EVEN in the one where they printed the result without observer BEFORE the experiment, in attempt to merge in the Schrodinger's cat factor into the experiment)
Differently put, at least in my view:
The deeper into the quantum realm one goes, the merge of the scientific andere spiritual happens.
Although, currently, the way of knowing it differs.
Science is cognizant and dividing this and that, in the mind. The other is spiritual, in the not- mind, or mindless-state, but observes the whole.
Sure thing there Buck Rogers!