Is this how they usher in the "new" Gates/Soros testing? I'm sure it would be sold as able to detect ALL the variants even the ones they haven't come up with yet.
Except this test was Warp speeded. It was created days after the WHO first refused to declare the pandemic. It was enough to get them to change their mind, and to keep the statistical pandemic going.
No, of course it's not suspicious. And I'm 100% sure the next test will be based on an actual gene sequence as opposed to one composed by computer heuristics, and "researcher" assumptions.
I figure the next 'new' shiny test will magically detect antibodies (but won't find any) as well as detect every single variant even the ones that haven't happened yet.
Detect antibodies after flipping epidemiology on its head. The presence of antibodies used to mean that you had immunity, now it will mean that you are infected.
Did they say it doesn't work somewhere? Would love to see them admit that, but I only read the landing page. Is that statement somewhere else? I'm lazy this morning and didn't open other links. LOL! This seems to be recommending a multiplexed method but doesn't give a reason as to why they're pulling the emergency authorization for the one they've been using. You're probably right that is doesn't work...and never has, but I'd love to see that stated somewhere. Could REALLY use showing that kind of thing to friends and family right now.
They seem to clearly imply that influenza (normal old flu) cases represented a significant portion of the 'covid-19 positive' results from that assay.
Quote from OP's link: "CDC encourages laboratories to consider adoption of a multiplexed method that can facilitate detection and differentiation of SARS-CoV-2 and influenza viruses." (key word= differentiation)
Yeah, I get it, but it's not enough for me to red pill MY family with. "Seeming to clearly imply" is just not good enough. They'll say it's a stretch to assume the original test didn't work even though I sent them info in the beginning that it couldn't differentiate between ANY coronavirus. I was just hoping someone did a little digging on any of the page links and found something more concrete. I'll probably take the time a little later and will drop anything I find that I think might be helpful. Appreciate your comment, though. Have a great weekend!
They're saying the new test going forward should preferably be able to tell you if you have covid, flu or neither. As in test for both within the same test. Current tests can only tell you if you specifically have the flu or if you specifically have covid, etc.
So.... that means there was never a “pandemic” but it was a plandemic! But the vast majority of people are too stupid to connect those dots!
They are. You can forward this link and even highlight the language, and 90% of people are too stupid or lazy to give it serious consideration.
Is this how they usher in the "new" Gates/Soros testing? I'm sure it would be sold as able to detect ALL the variants even the ones they haven't come up with yet.
So they are waiting til 31 December? enough time for the dying to start and then blame the unvaxxed.
Yep. They can Warp speed a vaccine but not a test.......
Except this test was Warp speeded. It was created days after the WHO first refused to declare the pandemic. It was enough to get them to change their mind, and to keep the statistical pandemic going.
Right, it was, but the 'next' one can't just be substituted? We have to wait 5 months until the end of the year. Not suspicious at all.
No, of course it's not suspicious. And I'm 100% sure the next test will be based on an actual gene sequence as opposed to one composed by computer heuristics, and "researcher" assumptions.
I figure the next 'new' shiny test will magically detect antibodies (but won't find any) as well as detect every single variant even the ones that haven't happened yet.
Detect antibodies after flipping epidemiology on its head. The presence of antibodies used to mean that you had immunity, now it will mean that you are infected.
If the PCR test fails review, I wonder if it is likely that the vaccines themselves would fail review?
Archived link. https://archive.ph/AkmRA
MSM won't report it cause it didn't happen.....yet.
Did they say it doesn't work somewhere? Would love to see them admit that, but I only read the landing page. Is that statement somewhere else? I'm lazy this morning and didn't open other links. LOL! This seems to be recommending a multiplexed method but doesn't give a reason as to why they're pulling the emergency authorization for the one they've been using. You're probably right that is doesn't work...and never has, but I'd love to see that stated somewhere. Could REALLY use showing that kind of thing to friends and family right now.
They seem to clearly imply that influenza (normal old flu) cases represented a significant portion of the 'covid-19 positive' results from that assay.
Quote from OP's link: "CDC encourages laboratories to consider adoption of a multiplexed method that can facilitate detection and differentiation of SARS-CoV-2 and influenza viruses." (key word= differentiation)
Yeah, I get it, but it's not enough for me to red pill MY family with. "Seeming to clearly imply" is just not good enough. They'll say it's a stretch to assume the original test didn't work even though I sent them info in the beginning that it couldn't differentiate between ANY coronavirus. I was just hoping someone did a little digging on any of the page links and found something more concrete. I'll probably take the time a little later and will drop anything I find that I think might be helpful. Appreciate your comment, though. Have a great weekend!
They're saying the new test going forward should preferably be able to tell you if you have covid, flu or neither. As in test for both within the same test. Current tests can only tell you if you specifically have the flu or if you specifically have covid, etc.
LOL like you expect them to give actual information and data? Nope, it's not in there anywhere.
That's what I figured.