We make their equipment, arms, vehicles, etc. There are no U.N. peacekeeping troops in the U.S. That is patently false. We typically don't let foreign militaries of any size into the country. It's usually just a few handpicked individuals we allow in for training purposes so they can go back home and train their people. Anyone saying otherwise is lying or is ignorant to what the military actually allows.
When I mentioned it to my husband, a Gulf War vet, he said very much the same thing. He also mentioned a bunch a red tape that would have to occur in Congress and at the UN for this to even be approved. He is of the opinion that if this was true, it would be too big for it not to hit MSM.
Yes yes I know it comes from Q post 4414. I am interested in opinions. Yes Emergency action message is the first definition that makes sense when you gogle it. I dont think that is what it means though.
EAM is also an English word that was used to define a coalition of leftist organizations in Greece resisting the German occupation during WWII. Word is derived from Ethniko Apeleutherotiko Metopo National Liberation Front.
Be carefull, the video with a female officer is from i think 2 years ago, not new,
Regarding Canada, people found that at the address, there's a facility that builds those vehicles and apparently are new
Anthony Blinken just invited the UN in to investigate systemic racism in America.
We need UN troops for this? Sounds like a cover story to me. If true, they are preparing to hold the line when the election results are released. Either way, it can't be good IMO.
Indeed, that's the point, wait until you have a real confirmation
I agree, the idea is not really so remote, i saw a few threads ago that seems the mandatory vax for MIL has started already, if that's true good luck, UN troops will replace MILs so that no risk of moral / feelings toward civilians,
Yeah... I’m paying attention to this for sure. But I will say.... you can consider UN presence on US soil to be a sign things are NOT going to plan, and patriots are anything but in control.
No, I consider UN troops to be a desperation play by the globalists. Its the obvious play of dictators: bring in the military of another country and treat your citizens as the enemy. Castro brought in Venezuelan troops to suppress his own citizens.
We make their equipment, arms, vehicles, etc. There are no U.N. peacekeeping troops in the U.S. That is patently false. We typically don't let foreign militaries of any size into the country. It's usually just a few handpicked individuals we allow in for training purposes so they can go back home and train their people. Anyone saying otherwise is lying or is ignorant to what the military actually allows.
When I mentioned it to my husband, a Gulf War vet, he said very much the same thing. He also mentioned a bunch a red tape that would have to occur in Congress and at the UN for this to even be approved. He is of the opinion that if this was true, it would be too big for it not to hit MSM.
ahahahaha
Yeh I hear ya.
UN Troops on US Soil performing Unconstitutional ops could cause “EAM Loyalists”
Interesting point. Your thoughts on what EAM loyalists means ?
Loyalists speaks for itself ( Believers in the Foundations of America)
Sure but I still can't figure out EAM
I'm not as autistic as some here so I couldn't tell you which one, but EAM loyalists comes from a Q post.
EAM is speculated to mean emergency action message
If you search for "EAM loyalists" it'll pull up no problem.
Yes yes I know it comes from Q post 4414. I am interested in opinions. Yes Emergency action message is the first definition that makes sense when you gogle it. I dont think that is what it means though.
EAM is also an English word that was used to define a coalition of leftist organizations in Greece resisting the German occupation during WWII. Word is derived from Ethniko Apeleutherotiko Metopo National Liberation Front.
/u/#q4414
Be carefull, the video with a female officer is from i think 2 years ago, not new, Regarding Canada, people found that at the address, there's a facility that builds those vehicles and apparently are new
rails heard nothing about it
Have to agree, I'm afraid.
We need UN troops for this? Sounds like a cover story to me. If true, they are preparing to hold the line when the election results are released. Either way, it can't be good IMO.
He invited one person from the UN. People keep saying he "invited the UN" but it's just one person (I forget his/her official title).
But even 1 person is 1 too many, IMO.
Yes I agree the principle of the invite is effed up.
Indeed, that's the point, wait until you have a real confirmation
I agree, the idea is not really so remote, i saw a few threads ago that seems the mandatory vax for MIL has started already, if that's true good luck, UN troops will replace MILs so that no risk of moral / feelings toward civilians,
You know, basically the NATO is already the NWO..
Yep, apparently it's the new NATO military branch headquarters
https://www.defense.gov/Explore/News/Article/Article/2696189/milley-marks-full-operational-capability-of-nato-command-in-norfolk/
Do you happen to have a link or remember the publication? That's unsettling.
UN is not in Utah. Now Norfolk, that's another story.
If the UN was taken out vice twin towers would this be a concern/discussion.
Sorry, I don't really understand the question.
Yeah... I’m paying attention to this for sure. But I will say.... you can consider UN presence on US soil to be a sign things are NOT going to plan, and patriots are anything but in control.
No, I consider UN troops to be a desperation play by the globalists. Its the obvious play of dictators: bring in the military of another country and treat your citizens as the enemy. Castro brought in Venezuelan troops to suppress his own citizens.
Negative. There is no scenario in which white hats are militarily in control and they allow a foreign armed force into our country
Guess it also depends on the force, was it 100 UN troops or 10,000?
True... but one is too many