For context, she’s a 63 year old nurse. We got into it because she keeps pushing me to get the vaccine. I keep telling her that I am never getting it, and I have thoroughly read and studied for months in support of my decision. So she asks me to send her my sources. I spent an hour last night re-reading journal articles and mainstream news source articles that link back to university and governmental studies. Sources such as the NIH, CDC, etc. I then placed them in a specific order so that they supported each other and my brief, educated assertions typed above the links.
Her response after all of that effort, effort that would’ve gotten me an A in any college course? “These aren’t .gov or .edu sources” “I’m concerned that you only read sources you agree with”
Mother of GOD, these people are DENSE. THE GOVERNMENT AND UNIVERSITIES ARE THE PROBLEM. THEY’RE SKEWING THE DATA. THE SOURCES FORMED MY OPINION, not the other way around. There’s no convincing them otherwise. Sorry for the yelling, this is just insane. She also brushed off the lockdowns and vaccine passports like they’re nothing to worry about and people protesting are just prolonging the pandemic 🤦🏼♀️🤦🏼♀️🤦🏼♀️🤦🏼♀️🤦🏼♀️🤦🏼♀️
As requested, my sources and synopsis in an easy to access location.
PCR test deemed ineffective for the purpose of diagnosing cases of Covid. This is a Class I recall and revocation of the Emergency Use Authorization for the PCR technology as a diagnostic tool in this instance.
Confronting the myth of unvaccinated people driving the formation of variants.
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/vaccinated-covid-mutations-immune-response/
EUA (Emergency Use Authorization) for vaccines is only allowed in the absence of viable treatments. The effectiveness of Ivermectin has been suppressed, thus, the EUA for the Covid vaccines is ILLEGAL according to the government’s own standards. Why is this allowed?
https://bmcinfectdis.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12879-021-06104-9
As for chloroquine (of which the much-maligned Hydroxychloroquine is a milder derivative) it was deemed to be a potent SARS inhibitor by none other than Dr. Fauci’s NIH. Note that in the Children’s Health Defense article, those recovered from SARS (80% similar to C19) demonstrated immunity 17 years later to SARS-CoV-2. It follows that Chloroquine and Hydroxychloroquine are effective treatments for Covid due to its similarities to SARS. This takes us right back to the illegal EUA for the vaccines, and the countless lives lost in pursuit of it.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1232869/
Those in the placebo group will still be granted a vaccine passport in the UK...this makes no sense.
Is the disease worse than the “jab”? The CDC is NOT gathering consistent data on hospitalizations for vaccine-related health events. Why not? What are they hiding?
https://aapsonline.org/covid-19-is-the-disease-worse-than-the-jab/
Doctors across the world have been pushing the vaccine on their pregnant patients for months and declaring it safe, yet Moderna is JUST starting trials on pregnant women?! There is NO data definitively declaring this safe for expectant mothers and their babies. THAT is the ethical violation I referenced. These are experimental vaccines and therefore informed consent is paramount so that those in receipt of them know the risks of consenting.
This Twitter thread with graphed data from government sources supporting the author’s assertions. Mostly or completely vaxxed populations are experiencing a high number of cases, while countries with a lower overall vax percentage have remained largely unchanged.
Thread by @holmenkollin on Thread Reader App – Thread Reader App
All viral illnesses can have negative impacts on pregnancy. There is really nothing that can be done to prevent this beyond working to maintain a strong immune system. I could get the Covid vaccine, sure, but end up with viral meningitis or the flu—life is full of risk, illness, and danger, and Covid is just one of millions of viruses that can infect vertebrates. I am not compounding that risk by taking an experimental vaccine, with NO idea what the long term effects on my body or the bodies of my future children will be. I would much rather take my chances with what is known.
https://www.jci.org/articles/view/87490
As for your position as a BSN—I respect that deeply. However, a medical professional that is using coercive measures to get a patient to consent to an experimental substance entering their body is against everything the field should stand for.
“Be not afraid” —St. John Paul the Great
Exactly. Its just tribalism at this point, everything is.
The world is so hyper politicised that nothing will ever convince either side of the truth because there IS no objective truth anymore.
Not even for biology it seems...
When two factions of society can no longer agree on basic tenets and also cannot communicate anymore...
This is when civil war becomes inevitable.
Not inevitable, but probable. Older generations used to have a mechanism for handling these types of disputes. We even have a word for it in English: canon. Most people have heard of canon in terms of literary canon (stories that everyone is expected to have read so you can have a discussion about literature with some common reference points), but it applies to many different things. A canon is a set of universally understood principles or narratives that all sides can agree on. Once you have an accepted canon, you can move forward.
We need to establish a canon today that everyone can agree upon. The Left obviously no longer agrees that freedom and liberty belongs there, so what does belong there? We need to find some way to communicate with those who feel differently from us. Perhaps we can all agree that harming children is bad? If so, let's start with that. Concentrate initial interactions and discussions on how these injections harm children. Everyone should be able to get behind that. Then, once we have something that we all accept, we can move to more controversial topics, but always keeping in mind where we agree so we have a baseline to retreat to.
I know this is old fashioned thinking, but it really used to work in this kind of situation. The question is simply whether everyone wants it to work. If they don't, then you are correct. Civil war is inevitable.
I dont want to live with pedos who want to groom and mutilate children.
They dont want to live with us supposed white supremacist fascist bigots.
There's no common ground here. The only way out is war.
I had a friend use "my/your" scientists/studies, when we were discussing covid.
Saying I'm sure my scientists said one thing but that his side's scientists and studies say another thing.
Outright admitting that studies are politicized, and only listening to their "side's" arguments, and completely rejecting any other data.