As a nurse I refuse to get the COVID vaccine but I was wondering I know that I used filter straws when drawing up medications from a glass ampule that you popped the glass top of and filters that we attached to syringes to draw of from a vial when mixing medicines. Could you request to have the COVID vaccine drawn up using a filter and would it even work??
Comments (15)
sorted by:
I don't know if this has any further validity, but I remember an article posted here a few weeks ago that ranitidine (and then possibly famotodine since it's a derivative) has a high bonding rate with the nanomaterials. https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlepdf/2020/ra/d0ra05530a
No, Ranitidine is used for gastrointestinal issues like ulcers - specifically it limits the stomach acid production. Keep in mind that the FDA recently recalled Ranitidine (branded as Zantac) due to additives being linked to stomach cancer.
omneprozole is a different class of drug altogether, even though they are used for similiar ulcers. Pepcid/famotidine would be the closest to Ranitidine
Filters aren't ubiquitous. They have to be built specifically to filter out things of a certain property.
A simple strainer is going to keep your grapes in the bowl, but let out water and everything small enough. A charcoal filter chemically binds to things it's filtering out, but not to anything it can't bind to. A polarizing filter filters light by its wavelength.
To create a filter for a "nano particle", you'd need to know the properties of the particle you're trying to filter for. Size, shape, polarity, chemical makeup, that sort of thing. Get whatever this "nano particle" is and put it under a microscope, document it, get that data.
Just using anything labeled as a "filter" is unlikely to work, especially since "nano" refers in science to objects 1000x smaller than "micro".
I pretty much speculated that wouldn't work but I guess a girl can dream. Thanks
The smallest filter stocked in most healthcare facilities is 0.22 microns. These filters are currently used for various infusions, but in the old days they were used to “sterilize” products that were not intended for injection so they could be given intravenously. This filter size was effective for bacteria, however pyrogens were not filtered and thus the infusions could still be problematic.
Upon review of the size of nanoparticles, it appears most sites reference a size of 0.1 microns, thus the filter would likely be ineffective.
Smaller filters likely exist, but I thought I could at least add this from a hospital or clinic perspective.
If they're magnetic, then perhaps a magnet filter of some sort could work.
It's graphene oxide. The nano things you speak of. They will activate when they crank the 5G up. Right now it's only mutating people's blood and causing strokes/brain issues/ heart attacks.
Real fun coming.
I watched Dr. McCullough on with Stew Peters recently. The Dr said there was no known way to "undo" the vaccine as I recall.
No filter gets 100%. The more effective the filter, the slower the filtration.
The more important question is how potent is the material? If the shot kills in 2-3 years, does a 98% filtration rate kill you in 10+ years; or can you metabolize the small amount so it’s harmless.
Engineering any defect is a defect, and simply sets the degenerate ramp back in time. But I am not a MD or organic chemist
Too small for any filter I can imagine. However graphene can conduct electricity on its surface. It might be possible to draw the particles towards a mild electric field of some sort, or attract to a certain material while suspended in liquid. But the particles would still require an electron microscope to view them.
Well, so they’re nano. Your net has to have smaller openings than that. So no.