21
posted ago by sleepydude ago by sleepydude +22 / -1

This is less of a shitpost and more of just me having mild frustration in my generation. I've pretty much given up on ever getting married, seeing how big of a mine field dating is these days.

Anyway, these have been my dating criteria for a couple years now:

  • Weighs less than me (185lbs @ 5'11")
  • Doesn't have tattoos whose total area of all tattoos cover more than 5 inches squared.
  • Doesn't smoke.
  • Never married.
  • I'm fine with kids only if the father is gone for good.
  • Has plans to pay off student loans in less than 10 years.
  • Less than $1,000 in debt on all credit cards.

A couple decades ago, I'm pretty sure these were not unreasonable. But today... Good luck finding anyone who meets the above outside a convent.

I only bring this up because I realized something today.

The first line... "Weighs less than me."

The old defense girls used to use doesn't work anymore.

The snap-to is "You can't demand women weigh less than you because women are built differently than men."

That argument doesn't work now, because admitting that means they agree with the idea that "trans women" aren't women.

Either I'm sexist or they are transphobic.

They can't have it both ways, and in this current political climate being transphobic is worse than sexist, so I'll always have the upper hand in calling them a bigot.

Using Liberal Logic, I can argue that all fat women are all transphobic.

Checkmate, BIGots.

Use this knowledge to your heart's content.