If a kid is born with Sickle Cell, they will have pain EVERY DAY for the rest of their life. If a kid has a parent with Huntingdon's, they're likely to lose their mind in their 30s or 40s. If a parent has AIDS, their kids will likely get it to.
Justfifying the lack of life by pushing for a life of pain and suffering is a poor argument.
Life is pain and suffering. If you think otherwise you are delusional. Killing things preemptively because they may feel pain at some point is a poor argument.
If there were for sure a certainty someone will come into this world with pain and suffering, you'd still let them come into this world specifically for the purpose of suffering just so you can justify some moral superiority about letting them live?
That sounds like sanctitioned torture-debt.
Don't jump the gun like a leftist and start going ad-hominem.
If a kid is born with Sickle Cell, they will have pain EVERY DAY for the rest of their life. If a kid has a parent with Huntingdon's, they're likely to lose their mind in their 30s or 40s. If a parent has AIDS, their kids will likely get it to.
Justfifying the lack of life by pushing for a life of pain and suffering is a poor argument.
Life is pain and suffering. If you think otherwise you are delusional. Killing things preemptively because they may feel pain at some point is a poor argument.
Why live if life is pain and suffering in the first place?
Very Malthusian and totally illogical.
Because it isn't only those things. How old are you? You sound like a person with very little life experience.
SO let me summarize.
If there were for sure a certainty someone will come into this world with pain and suffering, you'd still let them come into this world specifically for the purpose of suffering just so you can justify some moral superiority about letting them live?
That sounds like sanctitioned torture-debt.
Don't jump the gun like a leftist and start going ad-hominem.