I think that by this point, most people here on GA understand that it had to be this way. The election theft had to be allowed to happen, and the country needed to rapidly go to crap under [their] administration. We were told that people needed to be taken to the precipice before they would find the will to fight and change.
Had Q/Trump/military/white hats, etc. stepped in and prevented the election theft from going through, then all that would have accomplished would be preventing the theft of THIS election. It wouldn't have woken up the masses because they wouldn't have been driven to the precipice, and they wouldn't have learned the truth through pain. It would have just kicked the can down the road another four years (or less if they could get an impeachment) and put a temporary band-aid on the situation. IT HAD TO BE THIS WAY.
If the SCOTUS cases had given the election to Trump prior to innauguration, as we all hoped for at the time, then that would have thwarted the Q plan. So with that being said, did Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett really turn their back on the crime of the century, or were they doing exactly what needed to be done, to ensure that the Q plan could play out as planned?
100 percent agree my friend. NCSWIC
Most people cannot think out of the box— they must be shown My Mensa sister insisted the ‘glaze’ had worn off of her tile floor in areas— my industry is tile and stone and I told her it was impossible and merely dirty— snark was all I got for my professional opinion so when she was ‘ out’ I cleaned 1 tile — Mensa mind blown cause they truly think their conclusions are correct— like idiots ( neither have functional life skills) have to be SHOWN— otherwise you might as well have a conversation with a gnat
Let’s keep cleaning those tiles
Yeah well you can’t fix stupid and and her old man (80) got the jab— so did more based 56 yo sister cause her post breast cancer doc advised—I have no words— I don’t get flu shot- had whooping cough at 56 ( cause vaccines don’t give you real immunity if you are presented with the “real” thing-) but I worked in medicine with interaction with sick patients in my 20’s and my dad was a physician at a “ charity” hospital in pediatrics so he brought home a lot of ‘germs’ so I really have a great immune system- plus I actually had measles, mumps and rubella (German Measles) and Chicken Pox ( also had mild shingles in my late 30’s) Anyone who is scared of dying from a virus should reassess their life — Humans would be extinct if they lived by today’s terrors of a simple virus
I wrote this comment on another post awhile back. I'll quote it below. Basically, yes, SCOTUS did as it was intended to. In particular I believe that the dismissal of TX v PA was not only the constitutionally correct decision, but that the case itself was designed to be thrown out.
*I'm not a lawfag by any means, but I think I understand game theory well enough at this point.
I don't believe that the plan was ever to have SCOTUS single handedly fix the election. It may have been the right thing to do, given the degree of fraud, but the precedent it would set would could very easily spiral out of control in the future. The Constitution is very clear, the state legislatures have sole jurisdiction over how elections are conducted in their respective states, so it would make sense that they would be the ones to uncover and act on the fraud.
It is important to note, the Texas case was dismissed based on standing, not on its merits. We may not have been thrilled at the time, but that dismissal in itself set a sort of precedent, namely that states, even multiple states, do not have the standing to interfere in the way in which elections are conducted in other states. Can you imagine if they had taken it and ruled for Texas? We would have states suing each other every time they had an election with whose results another state government was less than pleased. It may have even opened the way for the Feds to start doing the same. A true Pandora's box.
Another side effect of the dismissal is that no one can argue at this point that Gorsuch, Kavanaugh and Barrett are Trump lackeys, since they all voted to dismiss. Alot of us are pissed at them still, but looking back, it was the correct decision, constitutionally. The left will still try, but we have a simple response now to shut them up. They could have given Trump his 2nd term single handedly, and they chose not to.
So we have now Arizona. Let's say the audit is completed, fraud is proven in sufficient amounts to swing the state. The state legislature votes to declare fraud and revokes its electors from Biden. Under the precedent set by the dismissal of Texas v. PA, deep blue states like CA and NY cannot do anything to intervene, as they have no standing to interfere in another state's electoral processes. Even if they did try to sue, their case could be thrown out in the same way, and no one could claim that SCOTUS was biased, as they threw out the Texas case for the same reason.
I think the Swamp knows this too, as pretty much every move they are making at this point with regards to the audit is geared towards muddying the waters and preparing their talking points for when this shit inevitably hits the fan. Any legal avenue they may have had to stop this thing has been exhausted, and had SCOTUS taken the Texas case, opening the way for states to interfere in one another's elections, we might be in a very different situation.
Given the above, I do believe that the Texas case was pre-emptive, made with the intention of having it thrown out. By suing to overturn other states' elections, however fraudulent they may have been, and getting it dismissed, they actually ended up taking a massive number of moves off the board for the enemy, and gave cover for Republican legislatures in AZ, PA, GA, etc. to do their part, without CA+NY or DC interfering.*
There has never been a forensic audit of an election in the history of the United States. President Trump has exposed RINO's, Fake Media, Communist Democrats, Hollywood, Pro sports, Marxist Corporations, Rampant election fraud. All of which would largely still be hidden. Can't be unseen.
I am shocked that this doesn't have more updoots.
Been my thinking too for last few months
Wiped from the news, Pepe remembers Trumps days of prayer with spiritual advisers and contemplation without public comment days before The electoral vote.
The course of the world lay in his decisions.
It does seem like everything is going according to plan (good).
Barr, ACB, BK, even Wray, Haspell maybe, EVEN Pence (!) all may have done exactly what was needed (or, at least what was expected of them).
Someday, maybe, we will really know...
If Trump had stopped the Big Lie in it's tracks - like even before his mid-terms, before Covid - then the ENTIRE WORLD would have united in a False Narrative about how bad the big orange neo-Hitler is... which is exactly what they ACTUALLY wanted.
He played them - the ENTIRE WORLD - quite adeptly. They are being routed WITHOUT him being in the picture. It's the ONLY way this could have ANY chance of success... because the "useful idiots" would have otherwise given the victory to the Babylon system that rules this world.
Oh yeah... even Fauxci may have done what was needed! (yuk, but true?)
All who failed to uphold the their oathes to uphold the Constitution are traitors in my book until THEY prove otherwise.
This is a really shitty plan. Just sayin