Not quite. If Q is correct, you lose your illusions. If Q is incorrect, we lose our illusions. The loss is equal. The only difference is that it would not be our first rodeo.
The illusions you are going to lose, we already lost those.
Its going to hurt you a lot more to lose yours. We could be wrong and it changes nothing for us, dogged pursuit of the truth will continue, regardless of what develops, we validate, we invalidate, we press forward -- and unfortunately for normie reality widespread individual self-interest didn't build this machine accidentally. 3 things:
Social Engineering is very real and ongoing. The intent can be measured by the result. Highly collaborative across too many industries and sectors.
Too much unchecked corruption across too many industries and sectors -- including, and especially law.
To be fair, you guys don’t give us a lot of credit for what we’re capable of imagining.
I absolutely believe there are rich pedophiles that get away with it and should be brought to justice.
Where you start to lose me is with Q himself and the belief that Donald Trump is leading some shadow group in hidden, genius moves against a cabal and so forth.
We agree on the general problems. Nobody has any illusions that the media can distort the truth and manipulate us. We agree that rich criminals get away with things. We agree that politicians lie through their teeth.
We get it. We just don’t buy the story that Trump isn’t an exemplification of these problems rather than some mastermind against them.
So I respectfully disagree. I would not melt if Q turned out to be correct about everything. I would be surprised that I underestimated Trump, but that’s it. I’d reevaluate and move on with my life and be glad someone as apparently capable as Trump is handling it.
And that is really not a terrifying future. Which is why I’m not really afraid of you guys being right whatsoever. I just do not believe that you are.
DJT is actually a really good guy. Lots of evidence of good character and genuine good intentions. Given that most evidence to the contrary comes from sources that have already proven themselves to be untruthful and deceitful, its a very weak position.
Look up anchor bias. Its the lever the corporate media and political apparatus have used to divide everyone. It worked in the 1500s through to the 2000s. Its only more effective with technology. Its just a good term to understand in this information age.
It is unreasonable to assume that multi-billion dollar companies, foreign adversaries, and internal power brokers would not go to great lengths to study, strategize, and systematically psychologically manipulate the population of the most powerful nation on the planet. Our politicians command trillions. Our military can be the salvation or destruction of entire nations.
No expense is too great to divide and manipulate us.
The illusion a lot of us had to give up, wasn't that there are no really bad people. We had to come to terms that our entire system was constructed to pacify us and the good guys are harder to find than the bad guys.
I talk about these illusions because, personally, I think everyone sees the same problem to some extent, the difference is the perception of the scale and cohesion of the network creating the problem. Anons took that leap and looked at the big picture.
And no one knows what Q is. We just know it pointed us to fragments that paint a very bad big picture.
Sorry to flood your inbox like a crazy stalker ex, but it is quite refreshing to have rational perspective here and I want you to know you're not alone in your skepticism.
I think the biggest thing we need to break is the hero worship. Chanting "we love you" in unison to a man who at the end of the day regardless of his personal status is still just a man and no better than you or I needs to stop. Trump is one man and I'd be willing to be that in the Q-bal hierarchy, he's pretty low on the chain. I will be just as surprised as you if it is in fact revealed that Trump alone was Q and that he alone came up with all of this. Or better yet that Q is but one individual.
Until then, Q appears to be a counter cabal of sorts. There are many Q. This is indicated by Q saying there is Q and there are anons. In the grand scheme, I would not be surprised to learn that a handful of anons are what make up Q. One man masterminds are the thing of fiction. Even though people unironically think Hitler was in charge of everything, reality does not agree.
As I’ve mentioned before, I think that there are a lot more kindred spirits out there than Q people give credit for. If this was purely an anti-pedophile organization dedicated to rooting out the misdeeds of the rich and powerful, you’d have my support and the support of a pretty diverse group of people you currently can’t reach.
Unfortunately, Q goes much further down the rabbit hole than that, and the more extraordinary the claim, the more extraordinary the evidence I require before I’ll start accepting it as reality.
I’m not here to debunk anything. I’m here to understand how I can look at the same story as a Q person and come to a wildly different conclusion. I feel that this generally benefits both parties as long as we both operate in good faith.
I am still skeptical, but it's mostly because we lack a lot of information. The evidence presented here is impossible to ignore. Especially Scott Free.
Not quite. If Q is correct, you lose your illusions. If Q is incorrect, we lose our illusions. The loss is equal. The only difference is that it would not be our first rodeo.
The illusions you are going to lose, we already lost those.
Its going to hurt you a lot more to lose yours. We could be wrong and it changes nothing for us, dogged pursuit of the truth will continue, regardless of what develops, we validate, we invalidate, we press forward -- and unfortunately for normie reality widespread individual self-interest didn't build this machine accidentally. 3 things:
To be fair, you guys don’t give us a lot of credit for what we’re capable of imagining.
I absolutely believe there are rich pedophiles that get away with it and should be brought to justice.
Where you start to lose me is with Q himself and the belief that Donald Trump is leading some shadow group in hidden, genius moves against a cabal and so forth.
We agree on the general problems. Nobody has any illusions that the media can distort the truth and manipulate us. We agree that rich criminals get away with things. We agree that politicians lie through their teeth.
We get it. We just don’t buy the story that Trump isn’t an exemplification of these problems rather than some mastermind against them.
So I respectfully disagree. I would not melt if Q turned out to be correct about everything. I would be surprised that I underestimated Trump, but that’s it. I’d reevaluate and move on with my life and be glad someone as apparently capable as Trump is handling it.
And that is really not a terrifying future. Which is why I’m not really afraid of you guys being right whatsoever. I just do not believe that you are.
DJT is actually a really good guy. Lots of evidence of good character and genuine good intentions. Given that most evidence to the contrary comes from sources that have already proven themselves to be untruthful and deceitful, its a very weak position.
Look up anchor bias. Its the lever the corporate media and political apparatus have used to divide everyone. It worked in the 1500s through to the 2000s. Its only more effective with technology. Its just a good term to understand in this information age.
It is unreasonable to assume that multi-billion dollar companies, foreign adversaries, and internal power brokers would not go to great lengths to study, strategize, and systematically psychologically manipulate the population of the most powerful nation on the planet. Our politicians command trillions. Our military can be the salvation or destruction of entire nations.
No expense is too great to divide and manipulate us.
The illusion a lot of us had to give up, wasn't that there are no really bad people. We had to come to terms that our entire system was constructed to pacify us and the good guys are harder to find than the bad guys.
I talk about these illusions because, personally, I think everyone sees the same problem to some extent, the difference is the perception of the scale and cohesion of the network creating the problem. Anons took that leap and looked at the big picture.
And no one knows what Q is. We just know it pointed us to fragments that paint a very bad big picture.
Sorry to flood your inbox like a crazy stalker ex, but it is quite refreshing to have rational perspective here and I want you to know you're not alone in your skepticism.
I think the biggest thing we need to break is the hero worship. Chanting "we love you" in unison to a man who at the end of the day regardless of his personal status is still just a man and no better than you or I needs to stop. Trump is one man and I'd be willing to be that in the Q-bal hierarchy, he's pretty low on the chain. I will be just as surprised as you if it is in fact revealed that Trump alone was Q and that he alone came up with all of this. Or better yet that Q is but one individual.
Until then, Q appears to be a counter cabal of sorts. There are many Q. This is indicated by Q saying there is Q and there are anons. In the grand scheme, I would not be surprised to learn that a handful of anons are what make up Q. One man masterminds are the thing of fiction. Even though people unironically think Hitler was in charge of everything, reality does not agree.
Anyway, glad to have you here.
I appreciate it.
As I’ve mentioned before, I think that there are a lot more kindred spirits out there than Q people give credit for. If this was purely an anti-pedophile organization dedicated to rooting out the misdeeds of the rich and powerful, you’d have my support and the support of a pretty diverse group of people you currently can’t reach.
Unfortunately, Q goes much further down the rabbit hole than that, and the more extraordinary the claim, the more extraordinary the evidence I require before I’ll start accepting it as reality.
I’m not here to debunk anything. I’m here to understand how I can look at the same story as a Q person and come to a wildly different conclusion. I feel that this generally benefits both parties as long as we both operate in good faith.
Have you watched this yet?
https://www.bitchute.com/video/4cQc9X9l0a5Y/
I am still skeptical, but it's mostly because we lack a lot of information. The evidence presented here is impossible to ignore. Especially Scott Free.
Here is a tldr of your "rational perspective".
First you say 'Trump is low on the Q hierarchy chain'.
Then you say 'Trump alone was Q and came up with the whole thing himself'.
Then its 'a handful of anons are Q'.
And finally 'One man masterminds are complete fiction'.